June 18th 2013
Rand Paul goes neocon on immigration
Walter

Posted under Immigration

When it comes to immigration, Rand Paul is the newest neoconservative.  In fact, he’s worse than neocons.  While some neocons  (like David Frum) have wised up on immigration, Rand Paul is peddling ridiculous neocon cliches from a decade ago (like “Hispanics are natural Republicans”) that some neocons today no longer even believe.

In short, Rand Paul is worthless.  For anyone who put effort into his campaign, what a waste of time and energy.

Some recent articles:

Matthew Cooper, National Journal: “Why Rand Paul’s Hispanic Pitch Is Doomed:
He’s pushing the idea that Hispanics are natural Republicans. The polling says that’s wrong

Jesse Mossman:  “Rand Paul Does A Rubio: Tells Illegals ‘We will find a place for you’

Dennis Mangan:  “What’s wrong with libertarians?”

Jack Ryan:  “Libertarian Immigration Treason… Not Just Ron and Rand Paul

Other:

CIS: “74.7% of Mexican immigrants use some form of welfare in the USA

Frank Salter: “Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests: Is It Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration?

4 Comments »

June 18th 2013
Military plans would put women in most combat jobs including SEALS, Army Rangers
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under Political Correctness

Yes, it’s true – the military will begin “tearing down the walls” that have held women back in the armed forces. All I can say is: It’s about time!

Just think – for hundreds of thousands of years, no one realized that women are just as strong and fast as men. Imagine all the military capabilities that have been ignored all this time.

Of course, there’s no conceivable (ha!) reason that society would want men out on the battlefield protecting women, seeing as how both sexes – excuse me, genders – are completely interchangeable.

And there’s another benefit to this move: Once men in the military realize women are their equals, sexual harrassment within the ranks will disappear.

Thank you, President Obama, for opening our eyes and blazing a new path toward the equality of all persons!

11 Comments »

June 17th 2013
The “Libertarian” Cato Institute Defends NSA Snooping?
RedPhillips

Posted under Police State & Political Philosophy

You can’t make this stuff up.

The defense of the NSA program by these two authors is of particular note because of the authors’ affiliation with the Cato Institute that describes itself as “dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets and peace” and having a “strict respect for civil liberties and skepticism about the benefits of both the welfare state and foreign military adventurism.” The authors’ article is providing valuable cover for the advocates of the mass spying program.

The authors of the article Kristol is promoting are Cato Institute Center for Constitutional Studies President Roger Pilon and Cato Institute Adjunct Scholar Richard A. Epstein who wrote an attempted sweeping exculpation of the National Security Agency (NSA) and all the branches of the US government for the NSA’s mass spying on phone calls.

These tools say:

Legally, the president is on secure footing under the Patriot Act

Umm … not if the Patriot Act is unconstitutional. And even if a Cato scholar believes the Patriot Act to be technically legal, he should be bashing it as an obnoxious overreach, not using it in an apologia for another obnoxious overreach.

Regarding whether or not the coup at Cato was for the better or for the worse, I think it is safe to say that the verdict is in.

4 Comments »

June 17th 2013
The Official Theme Song of NSA Snooping
RedPhillips

Posted under Music & Police State

Given all the concern over the NSA snooping allegations, is Snowden for real, etc., I thought this site needed a little levity, and nothing says levity like a good 80s tune. I nominate this as the official theme song of the NSA scandal. (Have we dubed this as a “gate” yet? How about Snoopgate?) You know what they say. Just because you’re paranoid, doesn’t mean someone isn’t really out to get you.

Lyrics here: (emphasis mine)

I’m just an average man with an average life
I work from nine to five, hey, hell, I pay the price
All I want is to be left alone in my average home
But why do I always feel like I’m in the twilight zone

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
And I have no privacy
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
Tell mi is it just a dream

When I come home at night
I bolt the door real tight
People call me on the phone, I’m trying to avoid
But can the people on tv see me or am I just paranoid

When I’m in the shower I’m afraid to wash my hair
Cause I might open my eyes and find someone standing there
People say I’m crazy, just a little touched
But maybe showers remind me of psycho too much
That’s why…

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
And I have no privacy
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
Who’s playin’ tricks on me

(Instrumental)

I don’t know anymore
Are the neighbors watching me
Well is the mailman watching me
And I don’t feel safe anymore, oh what a mess
I wonder who’s watching me now (booo! ) – the irs?

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
And I have no privacy
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
Tell me is it just a dream

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
And I have no privacy
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
Who’s playin’ tricks on me

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
Tell me this can’t be

I always feel like somebody’s watching me
I always feel like somebody’s watching me
I always feel like somebody’s watching me

(Fades away)

6 Comments »

June 17th 2013
You love Lincoln, don’t you?
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under Interventionism & Iraq & Lincoln & National Review & NeoCons

You’d better – or Rich Lowry will tell everyone how “foul” and “rancid” you are. Those are the adjectives Lowry tosses at Thomas DiLorenzo for unmasking the crimes and treason of the 16th president. And Lowry makes it clear he considers anyone who has read DiLorenzo and questions the Lincoln Myth is part of a “small but foul pro-Confederacy strain on the right.”

Reading Lowry’s article, one can just smell the fear emanating from Lowry, a pundit who’s notorious for his tendency to run away from a fight while goading others to fight for him. Cowards often compensate by talking tough, and Lowry not only supported the invasion of Iraq, but the nuclear bombing of Mecca since the 9/11 conspirators were all Muslim. I can just see Richie Rich giggling in anticipation of thousands of innocent lives being snuffed out in the name of American Power.

I suspect what’s got Lowry so worked up is the steady progress folks like DiLorenzo have made in exposing Lincoln and the regime he founded. The ever-prescient Ed Sebesta hits the bull’s eye in his blog post when he says

What is interesting is that Lowry decided that this article needed writing. The anti-Lincoln campaign of the neo-Confederates has been going on for some time. I think this might be a sign that the anti-Lincoln campaign is going somewhere and the leadership of conservatism in America is beginning to get concerned.

Amen, Brother Sebesta! The concern is real because Lowry knows that exposing Lincoln exposes the Empire. The Lincoln Myth of the Great Liberator is the founding myth of the rogue global empire headquartered in DC today. That myth justifies the ruling elite’s power and privilege in the name of spreading freedom and democracy, terms we heard ad nauseum in the run-up to the illegal invasion of Iraq.

Lincoln’s role as the founder and model of today’s authoritarian American Empire isn’t just my idea. Here’s what Lowry himself wrote recently in an article entitled, “Lincoln Can Teach Us Today“:

The National Security Agency telephone and Internet surveillance program is similar to Abraham Lincoln’s Civil War act of suspending habeas corpus, National Review editor Rich Lowry tells Newsmax.

“When he did it initially, any reasonable person would think it was an appropriate measure because troops were coming down from the North at the beginning of the war when Washington was isolated and not protected, and they were stopped in Baltimore by mobs.”

However, many in Lincoln’s day believed the suspension went too far when it became almost a matter of routine, Lowry said.

5 Comments »

June 15th 2013
…one that you don’t really know
Hawthorne

Posted under "Birther" & esoterica

The Drone Ranger: Obama’s Dirty Wars

George Bush, a bit more squeamish than Obama, never did that; but Mr. Obama felt those decisions were the president’s responsibility: he want[s] to keep his own finger on the trigger,” according to one report.A tidy, scheduled man, the President only picks his victims once a week, now called “Terror Tuesday
On October 14, 2011, in Shabwah province, Yemen, Abdul, went out with his cousins and friends for a good old US-style barbecue, when Obama’s drone fired a rocket, blowing the teenager to pieces…

Obama’s minions tried to cover up the hit on the teenagers.  Attorney General Eric Holder informed Congress of the killings by writing that U.S. drones had blown up Anwar al-Awlaki, the crazy cleric and three other Americans who “were not specifically targeted.”

Holder’s comment makes it seem that Awlaki’s son was blown up with him—a sad case of ‘collateral damage.’

But are you ready for this?  The teenager—along with his cousin and friends—was killed two weeks after and hundreds of miles away from the site where rockets killed his father…

I am convinced the hit on al-Awlaki’s son was meant to teach a lesson, If you want to be a martyr, we’ll make your son and your mom and daughter martyrs too. 

Such terror-for-terror can be, I’ll admit, quite effective.  During the Ronald Reagan years, that gutless faux-cowboy President sent weapons to Ayatollah Khomeini in return for the release of hostages taken by Hezbollah.  The Russians got their hostages home another way.  The USSR didn’t accept an arms-for-hostage deal. Rather, the KGB systematically assassinated the hostage-takers’ cousins, mothers and brothers one by one—until Hezbollah released all the Russian hostages.

The narrative, particularly strong on the various forms of the ‘right’, portrays Obama as a disengaged (seen as a positive), perhaps, lightweight, a product of his managers.  Even the most frustrated paleo noted that George W. would mock the “neocons” Kristol and Krauthammer, by calling them the Bomber Boys.

Obama is something new; I am not sure what.  I know Presidents in the past have made Executive Decisions (e.g. Diem in Vietnam), but this, this is something new as it’s quasi legal, does not involve the elimination of Executives and in this case,  Anwar al-Awlaki, had been invited to the Pentagon in the months after 9/11, and apparently, this is a weekly event.

The Italian (or Sicilian) Mafia was able to provide a certain order (at least according to myth) by agreeing that families were off limits.  It was the arrival of the Russian Mob to Brighton Beach (thank you, Senator Scoop Jackson, arch neocon!) in alliance with NY Politicos (looking at you Guiliani, Schumer and D’Amato)  that did in the Italians, and allowed the rise of the Russian Mob, and the death of the ‘family off limits’ ethic.

Anyway, read the article.

Geto Boys, D-mn it Feels Good to be a Gangster  (a worthwhile “rap” video from 1992–linking to the relatively clean version)

22 Comments »

June 15th 2013
Follow us on Twitter
Admin2

Posted under Site Issues

If you don’t already, please follow us on Twitter:  @ConservTimes

No Comments »

June 15th 2013
Help Stop Senate Amnesty Bill
Walter

Posted under Immigration

From Email:

Please help us stop the Obama-Rubio (aka Gang of 8) Amnesty.  It will cost taxpayers near $7 trillion dollars, flood the market with cheap labor, increase legal immigration, drive down wages (esp in STEM fields), lower the quality of public schools, and increase violent crime.

Everyone needs to do these two things….

(1)  Send these free faxes from NumbersUSA:

https://www.numbersusa.com/sendfax

Make sure you click “I’d like to send more faxes in the future” so that you can send future faxes.  Your information will not be shared.

(2)  Read VDare.com daily and make sure you sign up for VDare’s email alerts:

http://www.vdare.com/e-bulletins

Please take the two above steps.

And please forward this email to everyone you know.  If you have a blog, post this information on your blog.

Thanks.

No Comments »

June 14th 2013
Edward Snowden Supported Ron Paul
RedPhillips

Posted under Police State & Ron Paul

He donated to Paul’s campaign twice in 2012.

Take that Thomas Friedman, David Brooks, Charles Johnson and the rest of you Establishment lickspittles.

24 Comments »

June 14th 2013
Keep on Rockin’ in the Free World
Hawthorne

Posted under esoterica & Immigration & Interventionism

Drudge: USA to provide military support to Syria “Rebels”

USA Today: Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda

Breitbart: Obama Admin Considers Resettling Thousands of Syrian Refugees in U.S.

Discuss.

Pearl Jam with Neil Young

17 Comments »

June 13th 2013
They’re ba-ack!
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under George W. Bush & Iraq & Terrorism

Remember the coalition of big-government supporters who bullied and frightened us into supporting the Iraq War? That war, by the way, crippled both the economy and over 100,000 American troops, and spawned the USA Patriot Act.

Well, they have something else to sell you, so you better listen up:

Edward Snowden is an enemy of the people. The patriotic peoples of the United States of America are in perfect solidarity with their humble servants in the National Security Agency, who labor day and night to protect them from terrorists.”

Yes, the same chorus that sang the praises of the Iraq War, the Department of Homeland Security, and indefinite detention, is now demanding the head of Edward Snowden.

Here’s everyone’s favorite name-dropper and fear-monger, Thomas Friedman:

“I do wonder if some of those who unequivocally defend this disclosure are behaving as if 9/11 never happened — that the only thing we have to fear is government intrusion in our lives, not the intrusion of those who gather in secret cells in Yemen, Afghanistan and Pakistan and plot how to topple our tallest buildings or bring down U.S. airliners with bombs planted inside underwear, tennis shoes or computer printers.”

Yes, the li’l ol’ US of A was just sitting there, minding its own business on 9/11 when those dastardly terrorists slipped past the ever-vigilant George W. Bush and attacked the World Trade Center. And if you object to the National Security Agency monitoring your emails and phone conversations, it will happen again, and it will be your fault. So says Thomas Friedman, who is never wrong.

David Brooks, who went down fighting for the Bush-Cheney storyboard even after Bush and Cheney abandoned it, wonders how Americans could take a high school dropout seriously, then finishes Snowden off with this killshot:

“He betrayed the Constitution. The founders did not create the United States so that some solitary 29-year-old could make unilateral decisions about what should be exposed. Snowden self-indulgently short-circuited the democratic structures of accountability, putting his own preferences above everything else.”

Yes, of course. The Founders really wanted an all-powerful central government working in the shadows to give itself the power to monitor, indefinitely imprison, and even assassinate enemies.

Andrew Sullivan, who famously called for fellow homosexuals to cheer on Bush’s wars in the name of the Global War of Homosexual Liberation, now counsels Americans to hush up about the leaked documents and trust their betters in DC.

But remember, it’s not just the DC-embedded elite columnists who create consensus. There’s a role for blue-collar advocates, too. In the runup to the Iraq War, a coalition of progressive and conservative grass-roots bloggers sounded the alarm about Saddam Hussein’s plot to conquer and enslave us all. Of course, when no WMD were found, and the Iraqi insurgents took up W’s challenge to “bring it on,” many of these former war supporters, like their national columnist allies, backed away from the war and started pointing fingers. Even more embarrassing, the right- and left-wing blogs, such as American Power, The Other McCain, and Little Green Footballs, started sniping at each other in what I called the “Little Green Meltdown.”

But Edward Snowden’s leaks have brought them back together. Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs has been firing at Snowden’s supporters like a Gatling gun. (See here, and here, for example.) No one can match the biting arrogance of Charles Johnson when he scourges the depravity and ignorance of those who dare disagree with him. He dismisses Edward Snowden by simply quoting from the press release of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. So see here, peasants, attend to the words of your betters, and we shall have no more talk of “illegal” spying.

Not to be outdone, The Other McCain assures his conservative base that Snowden, rather than a hero, is a traitor who deserves the firing squad, hanging, and torture, with the only thing to be debated is the order of those punishments. Says he: “I don’t see any crime at NSA, beyond the negligence that put a high-school dropout in a position to decide what secrets the U.S. government is permitted to keep.”

And this: “Twitter Poll: #Snowden — Guantanamo or Leavenworth?”

These headlines reveal why we’re seeing so much venom aimed at Snowden:

More Americans see man who leaked NSA secrets as ‘patriot’ than traitor: Poll

Americans Disapprove of Government Surveillance Programs

Compare those headlines with this one:

Lawmakers see Edward Snowden as a leaker, not as a hero

So once again, it all comes down to defending the status quo. Our rulers in DC are a little nervous these days. Their machinery of control – that’s what government surveillance is all about, NOT keeping you safe – is despised more than ever. The regime’s legitimacy is at stake here, and its loyal servants know it. Therefore, it’s time for the presstitutes to once again do what they do best, and that is to shame dissidents, fool the American people, and erase dangerous ideas from public discourse.

Once again, it’s the “patriotic” thing to do.

24 Comments »

June 11th 2013
Rand and the hour
Patroon

Posted under Rand Paul

This is Rand Paul’s hour or moment or whatever designation of time you wish to give. All the revelations of government invasion of personal privacy, whether it be in journalism or tax records or phone calls and web searches all come back to the argument both Rand and his father for even an longer period of time and that is the driving engine of the growth of the federal government is the national security/military/industrial complex. There is no other way around this argument.

Considering the scope of Federal government’s power and the potential abuse of that power over millions of citizens of this country, the idea that a laissez-faire philosophy towards the economy can be maintains while the Feds can happily snoop into your mail or harass your civic group in complex tax law is ridiculous. It is a Sam Francis version of anarcho-tyranny where businesses are free to hire illegal immigrants but you as a citizens are being watched 24/7 to make sure you don’t violate the law. You can be felt up by the TSA at the airport but fellow in business class can plan his tax shelters with his lawyer on the flight. Or governments can seize your land for private developers under eminent domain laws yet put you in jail for protesting such actions because you made a terrorist threat.

The natural absurdities in such a system are perfect targets for Rand Paul and others to both attack and create a standard to rally around in opposition. But all these “scandals” of the omnipotent state are also valuable educations to those well-meaning citizens who don’t want to be treated as a potential spy or enemy and yet seem to also want some sort security for their lives as well. Total security is not possible, certainly not when PFCs or young hipster IT people can leak classified information almost at will. Yet you will get the total state in return for this impossible dream and then they will tell you in order to get one you have to accept the other and chase it like a hamster on a wheel.

It’s also a wake up call for Rand to realize and understand what he is getting into. If elected President someday he will inherit all of this apparatus and it can easily control him if turn him into a limping capon as it has done to President Obama. If being means being a Prisoner of the State, then it is not worth it. The disillusion which would follow would be almost heartbreaking. The meaning of a Rand Paul presidency or even candidacy has to be the deconstruction of such a state. There is no other purpose, none that which a dozen other politicians could do the same. It is the meaning of the very movement which made Rand a senator to being with.

Say what you want about President Obama but at least under him the Democrat Party is starting to make sense: total security at home and total security in economy. This wasn’t always the case. In fact the opposite was true before the Clintons and Obamas occupied the White House. This only made the party look as silly as the GOP does now, pretending you can reduce government while keeping the same level of surveillance over the citizenry. If there is going to be an internal GOP conflict it will be between those who truly wish to reduce the power of the modern state and those who have come to terms with it (even if their rhetoric still lies), not between imaginary moderates and conservatives or the “establishment” and the Tea Party. Even if a Republican doesn’t win the White House the nominating process for President will be important if only to establish who is going to ultimately win this struggle. Either the party will be a true opposition to what the Democrats have become or be it’s “me too” shadow which so many Republicans are doing right now, falling all over themselves in agreeing with the President on the need for the total state. Rand can lead this opposition but he has to overcome his own fears of politics.

14 Comments »

June 10th 2013
Pied Beauty
Weaver

Posted under Poetry

Pied Beauty
by Gerard Manley Hopkins (written in 1877)

Glory be to God for dappled things –
For skies of couple-colour as a brinded cow;
For rose-moles all in stipple upon trout that swim;
Fresh-firecoal chestnut-falls; finches’ wings;
Landscape plotted and pieced – fold, fallow, and plough;
And áll trádes, their gear and tackle and trim.

All things counter, original, spare, strange;
Whatever is fickle, freckled (who knows how?)
With swift, slow; sweet, sour; adazzle, dim;
He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change:
Praise him.

No Comments »

June 10th 2013
Dougie MacLean’s “Solid Ground”
Weaver

Posted under Music


Continue Reading »

1 Comment »

June 9th 2013
Edward Snowden, a real hero
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under Police State

The man who leaked the news about DC’s vast internet surveillance program has stepped forward. From the Guardian:

The individual responsible for one of the most significant leaks in US political history is Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA and current employee of the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton. Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz Allen and Dell.

Snowden will go down in history as one of America’s most consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the world’s most secretive organisations – the NSA.

There’s a great price to be paid for resisting the Empire, and Snowden knew that when he exposed the government’s surveillance program:

He has had “a very comfortable life” that included a salary of roughly $200,000, a girlfriend with whom he shared a home in Hawaii, a stable career, and a family he loves. “I’m willing to sacrifice all of that because I can’t in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they’re secretly building.”

Mr. Snowden, here’s a toast of Rebel Yell to a real rebel!

18 Comments »

June 9th 2013
Fred Perry Clothes Popular With French Nationalists?
RedPhillips

Posted under Conservatism & Culture

I may be the only one who found this info from the story below interesting, but I did. From The Guardian:

The fatal altercation started at a private clothing sale in an apartment in central Paris where the main attraction was the British label Fred Perry, whose polo shirts are highly sought after in France by skinheads as well as leftwingers and mods.

Fred Perry is popular with French Nationalists? Who knew? In America, I associate Fred Perry with hipsters. It’s that whole “ironically” retro thing. Sort of like Original Penguin. If it’s popular with skinheads and “leftwingers and mods,” then I’m not sure how that is different from saying it’s popular with youth, but maybe it is skinheads > leftwingers and mods or something like that. I saw the Fred Perry and Nationalist relationship mentioned in a couple of other places as well, so it must be a known thing.

Anyway, I have long thought that it would be useful if conservatives in America had a brand that we could wear as something like a badge. Conservatives in America are a heard of cats compared to Nationalists in Europe so I doubt such a thing would ever catch on, not to mention that most American conservatives probably think excessive concerns about attire are the province of leftists, homosexuals and women. It might be more realistic for American conservatives to identify with a certain style instead of a certain brand.

Any suggestions for brands or styles?

Addendum: Linda Bean, the L.L. Bean heiress, is reportedly a big Ron Paul supporter. L.L. Bean (classic, traditional, conservative in the non-political sense) might be a good place to start.

Addendum II: I Yahooed “Fred Perry popular with French Nationalist” to see what else I could find on the story. Apparently the French version of the Huffington Post (Who knew there was a French version of the Huffington Post?) has a story on the association of Fred Perry with “extremists” both left and right. However, it’s in French which unfortunately I can’t read. Here is how it is described in a English language reference to the story:

Also, the Huffington Post explores why Fred Perry is a brand popular with extremist groups on both left and right.

Can anyone here read French? Walter, are you listening?

28 Comments »

June 8th 2013
French Prime Minister: At Least One Far-Right Group to Be Dissolved for Violence
Weaver

Posted under Foreign affairs & Multiculturalism & Political Correctness

June 5th: A clash between far-right and far-left activists in front of a Paris clothing store resulted in the death of one of the latter. In reaction, according to the BBC:

Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault has asked the interior minister to take steps “immediately” to dissolve the [right-wing] Revolutionary Nationalist Youth (JNR).

However the leader of the JNR, Serge Ayoub, has denied any links to Meric’s death.

According to Euronews:

Ayrault said the government was looking into whether other far-right groups could be dissolved and reiterated his promise to “cut into pieces” neo-Nazi and fascist groups in France.

The National Front has described the killing as, “appalling”.

Would Ayrault start such a witch hunt in reaction to anarchist or Muslim crime?

-

Addendum: This reminds of Spike TV’s Deadliest Warriors episode, Aftermath – I.R.A. vs. Taliban. Who wins? Most likely the side that doesn’t use violence.

12 Comments »

June 8th 2013
Lindsey Graham approves of Obama’s domestic surveillance
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under NeoCons & Police State

Lindsey Graham says he doesn’t mind if the government monitors his phone use.

But I’d bet the Carolina Princess doesn’t mind lots of things normal people would find repulsive.

13 Comments »

June 8th 2013
Inslaw and the PROMIS of the 1990s
Hawthorne

Posted under esoterica

When the Internet, in its Second Form, was rolling in the mid-90s, an MIT Professor, J. Orlin Grabbe found himself a star—if only because he had content on interesting subjects written from an Againstist perspective.  He likely drove Jim Norman, then a Forbes editor, mad, as Norman flamed out with a delirious tale about why Vince Foster met an early demise. 

Anyway, no child of that time period failed to learn about Inslaw, PROMIS, and the dark entity, Echelon,that was already watching us on the Internet–Danny Casolaro and the Octopus–right?One just ceased to care.

Nevertheless, it is important to recall that the case of Inslaw and its stolen PROMIS software reached the floor of Congress when murder was alleged.  Wired does a decent write up, with a little less drama.

In the aftermath of 9/11, it was reported by Fox News and the Washington Times, that Al-Qaeda had used blackmarket PROMIS to move funds.

______________

Glenn Greenwald seems to have a need for conflict.  His last act as a lawyer was to represent Matt Hale, head of World Church of the Creator, in Hale’s defense against charges of conspiracy to murder a federal judge. I have always had my doubts about Greenwald’s climb, but taking a credit for the leak of the PRISM program makes those points moot.  While nothing was learned—really, a shock, the gubmint is tracking communication?—there is now a moment of promotion.

 Questions will continue as to what is the purpose—national defense of course, watching the bad guys.

 This misses the point entirely.  The purpose is retroactive—to have the potential to form a case after the threat produces itself.  The misdirection suggests future crime, when really, the government only looks backwards and trusts it has the tools to produce enough ‘damning’ things to neutralize potential threats.

And BTW, watch the movie, (streaming on Netflix) The Lives of Others.

At the present, an older set of sleuths are looking for a connection between PROMIS and PRISM—hint look-up VT-PRISM.

1998 article from Govtech: The Letter and the Spirit 

“Com Squared’s UNISearch is a customized solution for data-intensive problems. The solution had to work hand-in-glove with the Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS), the city’s ongoing data warehousing project comprised of VT-Prism and Inslaw software on an IBM mainframe.”

Hey, it’s a start of inquiry.

No Comments »

June 7th 2013
Putin and Lyudmila Announce Divorce After 30 Years of Marriage
Weaver

Posted under Foreign affairs & Russia & Western Civilization

Russian President Vladimir Putin has become something of a hero to conservative Christians of Europe and her colonies (such as the USA), so I’m saddened to read of his suffering a divorce. Russia Today quotes him with:

President Putin elaborated on his decision: “All my activities, all my work is being done in the public sphere, with absolute publicity. Someone would like it, someone would not, but some people are just absolutely incompatible with this,” he said, adding that his wife had been “standing the watch” for nearly nine years.

It sounds like Putin has become a workaholic, devoting his life to Russia, and Lyudmila didn’t enjoy the resulting lifestyle, as well as publicity. The marriage was sacrificed as a result.

I fear workaholism is a serious affliction of the US and Europe, most lacking the worthwhile cause Putin serves. Unlike many though, Putin did produce two daughters, who are now in their mid-20s. And 30 years of marriage is something.

Laurel Loflund put it well at Faith and Heritage:

Only you must think past today, think past the days when your present or future children prepare to leave the nest and begin their own families. What is the best use of your time, your money, when looked at through the lens of family survival and growth?

Too many Americans are workaholics, devoting themselves overmuch to causes or to monetary pursuits. A proper balance is needed. :)

11 Comments »

Next »