Category Archives: Terrorism

Antifa angst

Remember the anarchist/antifa gang that tried to blow up a Cleveland bridge last May? Their goal was to boost the Occupy movement. (Not sure how that was supposed to work, but as you can see from their pictures, these boys can’t be firing on all cylinders. Maybe Arthur Jensen could tweak Spearman’s hypothesis to account for the low IQ of these Occupy types.)

Anyway, seems one of the conspirators, Anthony Hayne, has made a deal with prosecutors. And the antifa who once supported the “Cleveland 5″ are pitching a fit:

Anthony Hayne was brought into the court room wearing street clothes instead of the usual prison orange. Emotions were running high as what many of the supporters and loved ones feared the most unfolded before our eyes. Around 9:30 AM Anthony Hayne formally entered into a cooperating plea agreement with the government on the basis that he was found guilty on all three charges. The judge seemed hesitant about Hayne’s move, as it included a mandatory minimum sentence of roughly 16-20 years in prison (188-235 months served). The exact amount of time served would be dependent on the level of cooperation with the government. Formal sentencing will not occur until the trial is concluded.

As the Cleveland 5 support group, as friends and loved ones of all of them, we are shocked by his decision. Particularly by his decision to enter into a plea that would, by its nature, require the exchange of information that would implicate and/or potentially make worse the case of his other co-defendants. As this is and will remain a political case, we can no longer express support and advocacy on the behalf of Anthony.

Reckon Hayne will have to turn in his black hoodie?

The storm approaching Charlotte

The Charlotte city government has issued permits to various groups to protest at designated areas and to speak at a city-provided platform during the Democratic National Convention in September.

Here’s a partial list of the groups with permits to protest, with links to their home pages:

Raleigh FIST, which believes “the only way to achieve true liberation for all peoples throughout the world is through socialism” and is therefore “dedicated to achieving such a society by building a multi-national, multi-gendered organization of revolutionary youth.” They even come out and admit they intend to achieve that by “overthrowing bourgeois society for a socialist future.” (They seem to mean it, too – check out their tribute to mass-murderer Che Guevera.)

Students for a Democratic Society of Chapel Hill, UNC Asheville, and NC State. You remember the SDS? That was radical bomber Bill Ayers’s group back in the 60s. And their radical rhetoric hasn’t changed a bit since then:

Oppressed people are at the forefront of movements for liberation. We understand that our work must target structures of domination in order to build powerful diverse movements for change. We realize that lines of power cut deep in our society, and we must be grounded in the work of combating systems of white supremacy, patriarchy, capitalism, imperialism, heterosexism, transphobia, and the many other forms of oppression thoughtfully and strategically.

And let’s not forget the Occupy movement, which promises to be a major presence in Charlotte come September. In the Observer article, Occupy Charlotte member Michael Zytkow expressed his disgust with the city’s rules:

“The parade route is abysmal,” he said. “We essentially want the right to speak at a zone that would not be far from the convention.”

“We denounce the government telling us where we can or cannot march,” Zytkow said.

Think these cats are going to behave?

Oh, and I almost forgot – 20,000 Muslims will also converge on Charlotte to host their own events during the DNC, including a massive public prayer.

I don’t foresee any possible problems. Do you?

Occupy protesters tried to blow up Ohio bridge


Luckily for us, Occupiers are easily recognized from a distance by their oddball hairstyles.

Here’s part of the story, from US News:

Federal agents have arrested five people who were plotting to blow up a bridge near Cleveland, Ohio, an incident not connected to the anniversary of former al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden’s death, officials say.

Douglas L. Wright, 26, Brandon L. Baxter, 20, and Anthony Hayne, 35, were arrested by members of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force on April 30 on charges of conspiracy and attempted use of explosive materials to damage physical property affecting interstate commerce. Also arrested were Connor C. Stevens, 20, and Joshua S. Stafford, 23.

But what’s a news story without context? Isn’t it significant that at least one of these anarchists was part of the Occupy movement, which has a history of violence? I think so, but hey, that’s me. Instead, the report only identifies the suspects as “anarchists.” Here’s a report on Brandon Baxter’s earlier run-in with the law. And here’s Baxter’s Facebook page.

If a Tea Party or other conservative activist had done anything remotely like this, the left side of the blogosphere would be screaming about it, and the mainstream media would be screaming along with them. Apparently, I’m the only blogger who knows the secret of Google.

UPDATE: It appears the other anarchists arrested with Baxter were also part of the Occupy Cleveland movement.

Nullify the NDAA!

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) grants the president as commander-in-chief to use the military forces to indefinitely detain Americans who are suspected of aiding terror groups.

Yes, you read that right – you can be jailed on mere suspicion.

What happened to the 5th and 6th amendments?

They’re still in place, argues Dr. Brian Phillips. Even more important, the 9th and 10th amendments are still valid as well, giving the people of the sovereign States the right to nullify illegal acts of a runaway central government. That was the purpose of Virginia H.B. 1160, which will prevent any “Virginia law enforcement agency from cooperating with the indefinite detention of Americans.”

It was the reserved powers of the States that formed the basis of resistance to the Alien and Sedition Acts, which Virginia and Kentucky famously opposed in 1798, thanks to resolutions drawn up by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.

Now that Arizona has joined Virginia in standing up to the illegal NDAA, nullification is back in the political arena. Jefferson and Madison would be proud.

Secret panel can put Americans on ‘kill list’

All those housebroken “conservatives” who cheer President Obama when he ignores the Constitution to launch wars and smite Muslims might want to start paying attention to where this is leading:

American militants like Anwar al-Awlaki are placed on a kill or capture list by a secretive panel of senior government officials, which then informs the president of its decisions, according to officials.

There is no public record of the operations or decisions of the panel, which is a subset of the White House’s National Security Council, several current and former officials said. Neither is there any law establishing its existence or setting out the rules by which it is supposed to operate.

It’s not like this has popped up overnight without warning. The central government long ago decided traditional America was an obstacle to its quest to globalize this country and achieve world hegemony. No wonder DC allied itself with groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center to target those who oppose “abortion or immigration,” or any other item in DC’s radical agenda, as national security threats.

C’mon, people. Stop letting our handlers manipulate us into trashing our civil liberties in the name of swatting exaggerated threats. DC is the greatest threat to our freedom — a realization now shared by 49% of Americans. This is your wake-up call.

CATO on Al-Awlaki and Blowback

Here is a CATO article by Julian Sanchez on the al-Awlaki killing which we have already beaten to death. I link to it here because it has a very perceptive discussion on the issue of blowback.

First, over the last decade we have been repeatedly told by foreign policy hawks that it is foolish, and even borderline offensive, to suggest that aggressive U.S. action abroad may have the counterproductive and unintended consequence of swelling the ranks of terror groups. When evaluating the wisdom of drone strikes or invasions of other countries, we need not even factor in the downside risk of “blowback” stemming from such actions, because “they hate us for our freedoms.” In other words, radical Islamist terrorists are fundamentally motivated by a vision of a global caliphate, not by any grievances stemming from real or perceived injuries inflicted by U.S. policy. I think of this as the “No Marginal Terrorist” Theory, because it posits that people are motivated to join terror groups strictly for reasons connected with either personal psychology or theology, such that reactions to specific U.S. actions never make the difference at the margin.

At the same time—and often by the same people—we are told that Anwar al-Awlaki posed a grave threat to the United States, not so much because of any particular logistical genius he possessed, but because he was so dangerously effective as a recruiter and propagandist who could inspire people already living in the West to jihad. Surely, then, it’s relevant to inquire into the nature of this lethally effective propaganda. Here is an excerpt from what The Guardian calls one of ”his most direct, English-language statements endorsing terror attacks on Americans”:

With the American invasion of Iraq and continued U.S. aggression against Muslims, I could not reconcile between living in the U.S. and being a Muslim, and I eventually came to the conclusion that jihad against America is binding upon myself just as it is binding on every other Muslim….

To the Muslims in America, I have this to say: How can your conscience allow you to live in peaceful coexistence with a nation that is responsible for the tyranny and crimes committed against your own brothers and sisters?

Possibly al-Awlaki is just a sort of Salafist James Earl Jones, and the sheer hypnotic beauty of his voice is what compels people to sacrifice their lives for him, without regard to the specific contents of his sermons. Still, it seems to be a problem for the No Marginal Terrorist Theory if a propagandist who was believed to be uniquely effective at motivating people to become terrorists used rhetoric like this to do it.

See more…

The “No Marginal Terrorist Theory.” I like that. :-) I would just add that the interventionist hysterics do not just suggest that discussing blowback is “borderline offensive.” Many suggest it is evidence of America hating at best and treason (a capital offense) at worst.


Paul Craig Roberts: Call Him Butter Because He’s On a Roll

PCR has turn out two blistering commentaries recently. I think advancing age has given PCR license to just let fly without regard for consequences or who he offends. As a result he goes too far and over states things at times, but he also tells truths few other are willing to tell so straight-forwardly. BTW, I don’t know if PCR still considers himself a conservative. His writing increasingly is posted at left-wing sites, and he is merciless in his criticism of conservatives.  He is also publicly embracing conspiracy theories.

First here is “Is the War on Terror a Hoax?” Read it.

I would not say that the threat of terrorism is entirely a hoax, because I don’t believe it is, and if you say that many people will just tune out everything you say after that. But I would say that the threat of terrorism has been vastly overblown. PCR makes a point I have made before. If you are a terrorist in America why would you try to blow up the Pentagon with a model airplane? That is just silly. There are many soft targets that could easily be attacked and there is nothing we could do to prevent it short of a completely locked down police state. Why no suicide bombers at the local mall? Why no car bombs outside the local kindergarten? If Muslims are such an unmitigable menace then why aren’t our home grown Muslims not out bombing targets on a routine basis? The sad fact is that modern Western society corrupts Muslims just like it corrupts Christians. The average Westernized Muslim young man is more interested in surfing the net for porn and getting it on with his girlfriend who dresses just as hoochie mama as the neighborhood “Christian” girls than he is committing acts of terror in the name of jihad. That’s not to say that there aren’t radicalized Muslims, but there aren’t as many or they aren’t as radical as the Muslim phobes would have us believe or else things would be blowing up around us all the time. (The Fort Hood shooter is a good example of the havoc that can be wrought by small scale acts of terror.)

Second here is “The Day America Died.”

This article is about the assassination of al-Awlaki. The assassination was illegitimate in the way it was done, although I don’t rule out the possibility of declaring war against Al-Qaeda and then treating people like al-Awlaki as irregular enemy combatants. I concede, however, that there isn’t an entirely clean way to do this since everyone in Al-Qaeda is an irregular combatant by definition. I also would be leery about using a declaration of war against al-Qaeda as an excuse to continue meddling. Any declaration of war should accompany our hasty disengagement from the region.

But PCR makes a point here that I was meaning to make and hadn’t gotten around to. (You’ll have to trust me on that I guess.) Since an executive order by Reagan we are theoretically not supposed to covertly attempt to assassinate anyone. Now whether this was just rhetorical window dressing and assassinations have been sanctioned since I don’t know, but that is our public stance nonetheless. But just for the sake of the argument, theoretically of course, if the US did decide it needed to covertly assassinate someone, then we should KEEP OUR BIG MOUTHS SHUT about it. (Al-Awlaki is dead? Really? I don’t know anything about that.) Calling a press conference and announcing you just assassinated someone is unseemly and couter-productive, and proves that the War on Terror is as much about PR as it is stopping terrorism. 

Before some readers write to declare that Awlaki’s murder is no big deal because the US government has always had people murdered, keep in mind that CIA assassinations were of foreign opponents and were not publicly proclaimed events, much less a claim by the president to be above the law. Indeed, such assassinations were denied, not claimed as legitimate actions of the President of the United States.

Is Justin Raimondo a Threat to National Security?

The FBI thinks so. This is an amazing story and should scare anyone who writes negatively against our war effort.

When I first saw the memo from the FBI’s counterterrorism center in Newark, declaring that I’m “a threat to National Security,” not to mention an “agent of a foreign power,” I was incredulous.  These can’t be real FBI documents, I thought to myself.  Someone is pulling my leg.

Sadly, no.  As I discovered upon further investigation, the memo is all too real.  The provenance of the documents, which indicate that the feds launched a “preliminary investigation” of, myself, and our webmaster, Eric Garris, is as follows: An obscure blogger made an FOIA request for information about the FBI’s investigation of the “High Fivers”—the five Israelis who were arrested on September 11 and held for six months on suspicion that they had some foreknowledge of the events on that dark day.  I wrote about this subject in the August 2003 issue of Chronicles—and, what do you know, that piece is included in the FBI file!  Isn’t it encouraging to learn that our state-subsidized sneaks are reading this magazine?

Read more…

How to Report on 9-11 Anniversary

For those of you who were following blogger discussions about journalists sacrificing truth for political correctness when reporting on black flash mobs, here’s another interesting piece of information that might help explain the very PC coverage of the 9-11 anniversary.  Apparently the Society of Professional Journalists has has issued the following (Orwellian) guidelines for journalists to use when discussing 9-11 or Islamic terrorism:

— Portray Muslims, Arabs and Middle Eastern and South Asian Americans in the richness of their diverse experiences;

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing Americans mourning those lost in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

— Seek out people from a variety of ethnic and religious backgrounds when photographing rescue and other public service workers and military personnel.

— Do not represent Arab Americans and Muslims as monolithic groups. Avoid conveying the impression that all Arab Americans and Muslims wear traditional clothing.

— Use photos and features to demystify veils, turbans and other cultural articles and customs.

— Make an extra effort to include olive-complexioned and darker men and women, Sikhs, Muslims and devout religious people of all types in arts, business, society columns and all other news and feature coverage, not just stories about the crisis.

— Seek out experts on military strategies, public safety, diplomacy, economics and other pertinent topics who run the spectrum of race, class, gender and geography.

— When writing about terrorism, remember to include white supremacist, radical anti-abortionists and other groups with a history of such activity.

— Do not imply that kneeling on the floor praying, listening to Arabic music or reciting from the Quran are peculiar activities.

The Onion couldn’t even make up such idiotic guidelines.  It’s  no wonder that nearly everyone now believes that MSM journalists are liars, and it’s unsurprising that more people now turn to independent media or bloggers for the truth.


Sen. McConnell Demands Iraqi Suspects Be Sent to Gitmo

With the FBI now asserting new powers to spy on Americans, no wonder a majority sees the federal government as a threat to liberty. So this “hang ‘em high!” pronouncement from Mitch McConnell, the Senate’s only Amphibian-American, is particularly troubling:

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R – KY) today demanded that the Obama Administration immediately remove two Iraqis arrested in Kentucky as “suspected terrorists” from his home state, saying they should be immediately sent to Guantanamo Bay for military detention.

“Send them to Guantanamo where they belong,” insisted McConnell, adding that the two suspects don’t deserve civilian trials and should be sent to the notorious island prison for “the justice they deserve.”

Yes, the two suspects are Iraqi immigrants, and my position against Third-World immigration couldn’t be clearer. But these suspects are here legally, and government MUST be constrained by the law of the land. In the never-ending, global war against freedom terror, DC has been expanding its power to arrest, detain, and punish at will. Every affront to the Bill of Rights is a precedent for the next.

Anyone reading this post could be a victim — and in the name of “national security.” These days, every dissident is viewed as a “terrorist.” If we assent to McConnell’s totalitarian proposal because of our opposition to Muslim immigration, we diminish our own liberty. That’s a trap we must avoid.

Bin Laden’s ‘War of a Thousand Cuts’

Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, The Atlantic:

A key facet of bin Laden’s anti-American warfare has always been economic. It’s a lesson he drew from the Afghan-Soviet war, in which he first served as a financier of mujahidin efforts and then as a fighter. He watched the Soviet Union withdraw from Afghanistan in defeat and then dissolve altogether in 1991. Bin Laden asserted on multiple occasions that the mujahidin were responsible for destroying the Soviet empire. Whether or not he’s right, he clearly believed that the high costs imposed by the Afghan-Soviet war prevented the Soviet Union from adapting to other challenges, such as grain shortages and a collapse in world oil prices.

After declaring war on America, bin Laden compared the U.S. to the Soviet Union on multiple occasions, arguing that al-Qaeda would undermine America in the same way the mujahidin undermined the Soviet economy. His strategy of economic warfare went through several iterations over time, as al-Qaeda responded to external events, seized upon opportunities provided to it, and incorporated lessons learned by the group over time.

Concerning just the 9/11 attacks alone:In a video he released in October 2004, he emphasized the cost effectiveness of the attacks. “Al-Qaeda spent $500,000 on the event,” he said, “while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost — according to the lowest estimate — more than $500 billion, meaning that every dollar of al-Qaeda defeated a million dollars.”


Our long national nightmare is over

Osama Bin Laden’s death by U.S. forces (instead of being by natural causes in some remote cave) is a major turning point.

Obviously having OBL killed and his body captured on your watch is a big deal for the Obama Administration, which hasn’t much to crow about for a broad base of Americans who don’t agree with his policies to support or point to as a success. Like it or not, he will benefit just as much as Reagan benefited from the successful Grenada invasion in 1983, a year before his re-election. Had this happened under Bush II it would have been just as important to him and his administration and the Republican Party. Sorry, but “birtherism” or “gradeism” or “bookism” or “he doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism” all this trivial crap, is pretty much done and over with now. There’s plenty of things to campaign against Obama, but not his legitimacy in office. We need to find real issues which will be effective in defining an opposition.

Second, there’s no other terrorist of bin Laden’s stature or symbolism who can simply “rise up” and take his place. He was important source not just of leadership but also money from his family construction fortune. Even before his death the Al Qaeda network as it existed on 9-11 was already badly degraded, many of its operatives killed or captured and many such groups which still exist are basically “franchises” inspired by him rather than controlled by him. They can be dealt with and dealt with regionally or in cooperation with other countries.

Third, OBL’s death at the hands of U.S forces is an important psychological marker for many Americans. If he had died eluding capture, he basically would have gotten away with the deaths of over 4,000 of their fellow countrymen without some sort of retaliation at him directly and that would been seen as a defeat in the minds of many given the amount of money and the number of people killed trying to capture him. Hopefully this takes away the fear which has affected the minds of Americans since 9-11 and hopefully it will lead to more and more people wondering why the hell they’re continuously being felt up at the airport now that OBL is dead.

Fourth, the argument which is going to be made over and over again from now through the upcoming campaign is “The War on Terrorism Is Not Over”. This must be made the crux of the upcoming debate. This war cannot be an open ended commitment. You cannot defeat nor wage war against a tactic. But you can kill the person who is responsible for 9-11 and now he’s dead. So let us declare victory and end this thing. There’s always going to be terrorists. You don’t need to spend nearly $900 billion a year to defend against them. Any attempt to continue this war is simply a way to continuously feed the military-industrial complex and the empire money it doesn’t need to handle the problem of defending against terrorism, which existed long before 9-11. Sure you need to stay vigilant, but not to the point of creating a police state which kind of defeats the purpose. And changing  our foreign policy will do wonders in taking what ever is left of any terrorist beef against us, especially if the end result is going to eventual death at some point (let alone trying to recreate the Caliphate, if that was even at all possible. If bin Laden got away with it, the opposite might have happened). Oh and on top of all of it is the simple fact that we can’t afford it. To continue the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq long well after the person largely responsible for them taking place is deceased is irresponsible and financially bankrupt. (No doubt some Afghani is probably saying right now: “Okay, you got your man. Now go home and leave us in peace.”)  Come Home America after declaring victory is going to sound awfully attractive now that OBL is dead. We’ll see who wants to take the side of “lets continue the war indefinitely.” The U.S. has enough of “War Against (insert unwinnable War here)”. This will be good stand for a candidate in 2012 to take.

It’s been 10 years since 9-11 and in those 10 years the country had to live with the not only the tragedy but also the shame of how it happened to those innocent of the machinations of U.S. foreign policy or one man’s twisted madness in response to it. We can break with the past and finally put it behind us for good to get our own house in order instead continuing to live in fear and chained to a foreign and economic policy which only feeds off of it. Thankfully OBL’s death can allow us to do so.

Look at all the people cheering outside the White House and in Times Square. We haven’t seen this since the end of World War II. Maybe the people think this war over as well…..

Chechen Warlord Admits Moscow Airport Bomb

I wonder if the neocons over at ACPC aren’t involved. They’re pro-Islam in Chechnya and Kosovo (which has been a disaster) but anti-Islam in the Middle East…

RT, “Chechen Terrorist Claims Responsibility for Domodedovo Airport Bombing“:

Russia’s most wanted terrorist, Doku Umarov, has claimed he was the mastermind behind January’s bombing at Domodedovo Airport, which took the lives of 36 people and injured more than 180.

He sees all Western countries as enemies of Muslims and has been proven to have links to Al-Qaeda.

Continue reading

The West Ends with a [Failed] Bang [Attempt] and Not a Whimper?

Yesterday, a bomb was discovered along the Martin Luther King parade route in Spokane, Washington:

A bomb left along the route of a Martin Luther King Jr. Day parade was sophisticated, with a remote detonator and the ability to cause many casualties, an official familiar with the case said Wednesday.

“They haven’t seen anything like this in this country,” the official said. “This was the worst device, and most intentional device, I’ve ever seen.”

No one was hurt (the bomb didn’t go off, thankfully).

It’s rather suspicious however:

Three parade workers spotted a backpack with visible wires on a bench at North Washington Street and West Main Avenue in downtown Spokane about 30 minutes before the parade was scheduled to begin Monday.

Is this the work of a false flag (Democratic pollster: Obama needs an Oklahoma City bombing moment to reconnect with the American people)? Hopefully there’s no link to anyone on the right or faux-right, though the mass media is working diligently to make such a connection.
Continue reading

Leftist: Violence OK if Part of Strategy

Francis Fox Piven:

The reason I respect nonviolence is I think it helps to protect the protesters. The espousal of the goal of nonviolence is a form of self-defence. … It’s partly a problem of strategy and propaganda. … Probably, unless you have good reason for breaking a window, probably you shouldn’t do that – unless it’s a big part of your strategy.


Righteous violence

This year, AD 2011, will mark the 10th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks and the beginning of the so-called Global War on Terrorism (GWOT). And yet after 10 years of war, there are a number of U.S. citizens who hate their fellow Americans more than they do the perpetrator of the New York and Washington attacks, Osama bin Laden. All an Al Qaeda operative would have to do to find out the state of American morale and unity is to browse the comment sections of major news outlet websites and gauge the vitriol following the shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords themselves. It would be an enlightening experience. The operative would no doubt tell his bosses all Al Qaeda has to do is simply hold out indefinitely and the U.S. war effort may very well fall apart due to the nation’s own internal differences.

Continue reading

Is the War on Terror backfiring?

We’ve been warning for years that DC’s policy of Invade the World/Invite the World was a perfect formula to guarantee continued attacks on Americans here at home. But the War Hawks insisted that invading and occupying Muslim countries was the only means of keeping us safe.

One of the War Party’s leading pom-pom girls claimed back in 2008 that the Neocon Wars were keeping America safe. But now that al-Qaeda has issued threats to attack during Christmas, that same blogger now worries the terror threat has indeed worsened:

My bet is that we’ll indeed see “Mumbai-style” attacks in the U.S. at some point. The national security focus remains overwhelmingly on air travel, and the jihadi extremists will simply develop new approaches.

But — Obama escalated the Afghanistan War! He’s sent an additional 50,000 troops. US troops have been “fighting them there, so we won’t have to fight them here,” as the Neo-jingoist cheer went out at the inception of those wars.

Could it be we paleos had a point when we warned DC’s illegal and immoral invasions would only enrage more Muslims?