Look, I was all down with Scottish secession, but one thing about the Scottish really annoys me. Why does Scotland have one t but Scottish has two? Maybe their next referendum should be “one t or two.” I’m tired of spell check finger wagging at me.
This is how neocon Lincoln idolaters would respond to Scottish secession if given the chance.
HT: Doug Mataconis
Steven Seagal, who has spoken out before in defense of Russia and Putin, played a gig in Crimea recently that was allegedly pro-separatist.
…Seagal played a weekend concert in the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, appearing on a stage adorned with the flag of pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine.
The Russia/Ukraine situation is complicated. Ethnic Ukrainians have a reason to be sore at and distrustful of Russia, but the problem is that Ukraine, like so many other countries, is too large and attempts to keep unlike elements together in a political alliance that is unnatural. Separation of the more Russian Eastern parts of Ukraine is probably the most natural outcome.
But whatever you may think about the Russia/Ukraine situation, you have to admit that Seagal has some serious nads. Publicly supporting Putin and Russia is not a popular position, and he is taking a risk by doing so.
RT reports on British children being given healthy genes from a third parent. However, if parents lack healthy genes they should simply not have children! Producing a child from three people is short of GE, but it’s unnatural. How does a man of honour draw up his family tree in such a case? Outrageous. It would be better for the genetically infirm to pay a healthy couple (perhaps a poorer couple) to have a child, and to adopt it.
It’s noteworthy that in this case “capitalism” seems to be the ailment, greater regulation (against 3-parent children) the cure. Usually GE horror stories involve an oppressive government forcing it upon a people, but the greater danger appears to be the free market.
This “advancement” of a 3-parent child is also significant for its potential to lead to actual GMO designer babies, which is to say children who are not products of God but rather man. Nationalism, striving for the continuance of the ancient nation and its ancestral memories, might fail; but a similar struggle for the continuance of humanity might take its place this century. It might no longer be so relevant what nation one is from as simply whether a person is human or altered.
As with so many political “experiments”, Brits are used. As someone of mostly British descent, I wish the mighty would find another population to experiment on.
Here is my Facebook post for today. So far it has 3 likes and 3 positive comments:
As I recall, the jingle went “baseball, hotdogs, apple pie and Chevolet,” but you could replace each element with, for example, “football, hamburgers, pecan pie and Ford,” and it would still ring just as true. However, if you said “soccer, hotdogs, apple pie and Chevrolet” you would sound like a fool. Ergo, soccer is un-American and should be shunned by all true patriots.
Unless native Britons take a stand, that could well be the UK’s future. It makes little difference whether the year is pushed back to 2080 or even 2100 if the result is the same. In order for the United Kingdom to survive, these trends must not merely be halted but reversed.
And if South Africa, the much heralded “Rainbow Republic”, is any indication: Affirmative action and other special rights will continue to exist in the UK for nonwhites well after native Brits have become a minority.
The Scottish Sun writes:
— 2050: Britain will be most ethnically diverse nation
— 2066: White Britons will be in the minority in UK
BRITAIN will be the world’s most ethnically diverse Western nation after 2050, a bombshell study has found.
A massive influx of immigrants has given the UK the fastest-rising percentage of ethnic minority and foreign-born populations.
Italians have elections this coming weekend, and the Anglo press, to the extent it has an interest, is focused on the generally neocon, but popular in the paleosphere for his ties to Lega Nord, Berlusconi, as he seeks a Lazarus like return.
The populist standard bearer is Beppe Grillo, a television star, who is using modern technology, and campaign barnstorming in tandem. The Ron Paul parallels are obvious.
Mr. Grillo is running on an ‘out of the EU’, repudiate the debt, expand Internet access, platform.
While not exactly Tea Party, the most interesting development was that this populist leader refused to join the antifa’s, or ‘anti-racists’ in Anglo terms, when it came to denouncing Casa Pound (Casa Pound, Pound as in Ezra, being considered beyond the pale, fascist to polite company, of course.) Good luck finding an Anglo-press article on this development–I can only offer a google translate.
Censorship and technology have such a ying yang relationship.
Mr. Grillo, the latest to embody a very new political tradition. God’s speed.
“It’s dirty job but someone has to do it” as the old saying goes describes exactly why France finds itself in position its does having to intervene military in Mali. France’s actions hopefully put an end to the “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” stupidity that exists on the American Right. I don’t see a lot U.S. troops on the ground in Mali nor will we. Drones have pretty much replaced actual soldiers at this point in the GWOT. At least France has real soldiers on the ground ready to fight.
Of course, the first important reason for France’s intervention in Mali is cleaning up the mess it help to create when it insisted they other NATO nations intervene in the Libyan Revolution. Having been defeated, Col. Kadahfy’s Tuareg mercenaries simply grabbed what heavy weapons they could from the Libyan army arsenal and went back to Mali and Niger and Algeria and the other countries these nomads roam through and starting causing trouble. The revolt by Tuaregs to carve off northern Mali into an automous state of Azawad and the political upheaval it caused in Mali was the first blowback caused by the Libyan intervention. The second was Islamic terrorists groups using the chaos as it’s angle to take control of northern Mali and push aside the Tuaregs, who only wanted self-government not seeing their women flogged in public for wearing the wrong clothes.
The second important reason has to do with collective security in response to aggression. It’s no secret France moved as quickly and surprisingly as it did because a red line was crossed in their minds which left them no choice. When the Salafist forces moved with 250 miles of the Malian capital of Bamako, then French knew they had to get involved. Had they not done so, it is conceivable the terrorists could have drive their pick-up trucks all the way Bamako and taken over. There would have been nothing to stop them considering the putrid state of Mali’s military, which is nothing more than a police army which is better at abusing its own citizens than fighting the enemy. And if the such armed Salfists groups took over, it would be the first time that such a trans-national terrorist group had seized control of another country right from the native people’s grasp (the Taliban were Pashtun tribalists allied with Al Qaeda).
Mali may well be a nowheresville to rest of the world but in this case it happens to be a central nowhere which touches everywhere. A Salafist takeover of Mali would have put them right in direct contact with the vicious killers of the Boko Haram terrorist group in Nigeria and providing an even more direct threat to that nation,which is the most important in all of West Africa, and to Christian populations the further south you go in Nigeria and states like Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso, Chad, Benin, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Cameroon, Gabon, Togo and the Central African Republic. It would destabilize the entire region which is filled with artificial states left over from colonial times whose in some cases governments hang by a thread. If Mali fell to such well-armed terrorists, then the same could happen to these states as well. Continue reading
Everyone should read this essay in its entirety:
When Treason Becomes The Norm: Why The Proposition Nation, Not Islam, Is Our Primary Enemy
Fjordman, Gates of Vienna
In 2009 it was revealed that the ruling Labour Party had purposefully flooded Britain with several million immigrants, without consulting its citizens, in order to socially engineer a “truly Multicultural” country. The huge increases in migrants over the previous decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt to radically change the country and to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity,” according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair. He said mass immigration was the result of a deliberate plan, but ministers were reluctant to discuss this for fear that it would alienate the party’s “core working class vote.”
Lord Glasman — a personal friend of the Labour Party leader — in 2011 stated that “Labour lied to people about the extent of immigration… and there’s been a massive rupture of trust.” He admitted that the Labour Party had sometimes been actively hostile to the white natives. In particular, they tended to view white working-class voters as “an obstacle to progress.”
To my knowledge, these shocking revelations of a Western government virtually launching a full-front attack to crush its own people have so far not caused a single word of protest from political leaders or mass media in any other Western country, although these acts could be construed as a policy of state-sponsored ethnic cleansing targeting the white majority population. In my country’s mass media, these public admissions from Neather were hardly mentioned at all, although journalists never miss an opportunity to warn against the dangerous tide of “white racism and xenophobia” that is supposedly sweeping the Western world today.
Interview with Russian nationalist leader Alexander Belov
Parliamentary elections in Russia took place on December 4 under a great of scrutiny from external observers and nationalist dissidents inside Russia. Nationalists face an increasing crackdown by the Putin regime which has recently banned a number of nationalist protest groups despite a huge turnout for the recent annual Russian March which attracted thousands of Russian nationalists and patriots from various groups.
The election results indicate that Putin’s United Russia party has lost support (losing 77 seats) but they still have an absolute majority of seats in the Russian Duma. The full result is as follows: United Russia: 238 seats; Communist; 92 seats: Just Russia (Social Democrats); 64 seats: Liberal Democrats (nationalist) 56 seats.
Below is an exclusive interview with one of Russia’s most prominent Nationalist activists, Alexander Belov.
1. According to the media, there were about 5,000 people on the March. What was the real turnout?
The media quoted different figures. From 5,000 to 20,000 people. Major media outlets have referred to a representative of the Ministry of Interior who claimed 7000 attended the march. I believe that the actual number of participants was more than fifteen thousand people Continue reading
“MOSCOW—Russian billionaire tycoon and Nets basketball team owner Mikhail Prokhorov Monday said he will run against Vladimir Putin in next year’s presidential election.” ~ WSJ
The next year is going to be intense. The neocons will want to intervene in Russia in every way imaginable — crying “anti-Semitism,” “election tampering,” and you name it. I wouldn’t be surprised if some call for boycotts of Russia demanding “fair elections.” Some will probably decry Putin as the next Hitler. (After all, in neocon time it’s always 1939.)
It seems that Putin’s major sin is that he isn’t a globalist: he booted out the Russian oligarchs (Prokhorov’s buddies) who were looting Russia, secured Russia’s borders, deported illegal immigrants, put the interests of Europe before Israel (but not supporting the creation of a Muslim state, Kosovo, in Europe), introduced Christian prayer into Russian schools, and, in short, pursued policies that were in the general interest of Russians. How dare he!
Ms. Rhea Page, walking home with her boyfriend recently, was beaten by a group of Third World muslim females as they shouted “kill the white slag.” Apparently, however, her attackers were just released from jail because they’re not used to the effects of alcohol:
“A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion. The group – three sisters and a cousin – allegedly screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they set upon Rhea Page as she waited for a taxi with her boyfriend. Miss Page, 22, was left with a bald patch where her hair was pulled out in the attack and was left ‘black and blue’ after suffering a flurry of kicks to the head, back, arms and legs while motionless on the pavement.”
Meanwhile, Emma West, who merely complained about the Third World invasion of her native country — about the dispossession of the native English from the country they have occupied for more than 12,000 years — has been thrown in jail without a trial, declared insane, and had her children taken away.
In Saxons, Vikings, and Celts, Bryan Sykes writes about how closely the DNA of the local English matched that of the “Cheddar Man” (a skeleton 12,000 years old). In other words, the local English had been living in that area for probably around at least 12,000 years. In fact, as Sykes points out, it seems that the overwhelming majority of the English are descended from the Paleolithic and Mesolithic settlers who have been in the British Isles for more than 10,000 years.
But in recent decades, as hordes from the Third World have invaded the British Isles, the ancient blood of the British Isles is under threat. The very country that Englishmen and Englishwomen have known since time immemorial is bring turned into a Third World sewer right before their very eyes. And some angry people are speaking out against it. Emma West, who’s now been dubbed The Epic Tram Lady, apparently had an outbreak on the tram. While her manner might not have been the most polite and effective, it’s understandable that concerned English will be upset at the transformation before their eyes. She had enough and could no longer keep quiet. But apparently candor comes at a high price in the UK, as Emma West might be prosecuted under the new Orwellian PC “hate” laws — essentially for saying in public what nearly every English person I know believes and has more-or-less said in private. I worry about what the future holds.
Sean Gabb: “Miss West has now been arrested for her opinions and locked away, and her children have been taken away by the social services. Of course, if she had been wearing a headscarf and screeching about the “kuffar” who were killing her brothers and sisters in Iraq/Afghanistan, the authorities would have looked the other way. For a woman to have her children taken away because she expressed opinions disliked by the ruling class means we have come as close as doesn’t matter to a totalitarian police state.”
Britain First: “Today, dozens of Britain First activists – and allied patriots – demonstrated outside the prison where the ‘Tram Lady’ Emma West has been incarcerated all week….The latest news to arise in this case is that Miss West is being subjected to psychiatric tests in prison! This is exactly the same kind of scandalous behaviour that occurred in the totalitarian Soviet Union: if you disagreed with Communism, you were declared mad! Likewise in Britain, if you disagree with liberal, politically correct multiculturalism, the ruling elite will also try to declare you mad!”
President Dmitri A. Medvedev announced Saturday at a party convention in Moscow that he would step aside for Mr. Vladimir Putin, who served as president from 2000 to 2008 but was limited by the Constitution to two consecutive terms. Mr. Medvedev is to take his place as prime minister after presidential elections in March, which Mr. Putin is assured of winning. ~ NY Times, Sept. 24, 2011
I’m sure the neocons have their panties in a wad. How dare a Russian leader care for the well-being of ethnic Russians! How dare a Russian leader expel foreign oligarchs controlling Russia’s assets! How dare a Russian leader take harsh measures to curb Third World immigration! As many other bloggers have noted, who would have guessed back in the Cold War that the most pro-Western leader in the world today would be a Russian, Vladimir V. Putin.
Violent black flash mobs have become endemic to the United States in the past year. Starting with the “Beat Whitey Night” at the Iowa State Fair, there have been hundreds of violent black flash mobs across the United States, which have shut down parts of Chicago and Philadelphia. Most recently, at the Wisconsin State Fair, large groups of blacks viciously targeted whites. In most cases, the US media have suppressed information on the mobs, refusing to report that they’re black mobs (often violently targeting whites), and misleadingly have reported that the mobs are “youth mobs.”
As many of America’s worst tendencies have been exported to Europe and the UK, so too has the black mob organized by social media, as evidenced by the race riot in London last night. Caused by what blacks in the UK are calling an alleged “Rodney King” event (which in reality was an “incident in which a policeman and a suspected gang member were both shot in what appears to have been an exchange of fire”), blacks in London utilized social media (as in the US) to organize, ransack, loot, start fires, explode cars, and attack innocent pedestrians (whites).
Here’s the NY Times:
The riot escalated into a pitched battle between lines of riot police officers, some on horses, and hundreds of mostly young black men, in small gangs of four or five, many with hooded sweatshirts pulled over their heads and bandannas over their faces. The young men arrived in clumps, on foot, by bicycle or on mopeds.
London braced on Sunday for more violence after some of the worst riots seen in the British capital for years which politicians and police blamed on criminal thugs but residents attributed to local tensions and anger over hardship.
Rioters throwing petrol bombs rampaged overnight through an economically deprived district, setting police patrol cars, buildings and a double-decker bus on fire.
“There is Twitter conversations that people are being asked to meet again down in Tottenham so we are all concerned but clearly we will be much better prepared this evening,” Richard Barnes, London’s Deputy Mayor, told BBC TV.
Police said 26 officers were injured as rioters bombarded them with missiles and bottles, looted buildings including banks, shops and council offices, and torched three patrol cars near Tottenham police station in north London.
For more shocking photos, see the Daily Mail. As a friend says, “Ah … diversity. It’s such a beautiful thing.”
Black flash mobs have come to Canada too.
Denmark’s strict immigration laws have saved the country billions in benefits, a government report has claimed. The Integration Ministry report has now led to calls among right-wing populists to clamp down further on immigrants to increase the savings.
The extremely strict laws have dramatically reduced the flow of people into Denmark in recent years, and many government figures are delighted with the outcome. “Now that we can see that it does matter who comes into the country, I have no scruples in further restricting those who one can suspect will be a burden on Denmark,” the center-right liberal integration minister, Søren Pind, told the Jyllands Posten newspaper.
Pind was talking after the ministry’s report — initiated by the right-wing populist Danish People’s Party (DPP) — came to the conclusion that by tightening immigration laws, Denmark has saved €6.7 billion ($10 billion) over the last 10 years, money which otherwise would supposedly have been spent on social benefits or housing. According to the figures, migrants from non-Western countries who did manage to come to Denmark have cost the state €2.3 billion, while those from the West have actually contributed €295 million to government coffers.
‘Restrictions Pay Off’
The report has led to jubilation among right-wing politicians: “We now have it in black and white that restrictions (on immigrants) pay off,” said DPP finance spokesman Kristian Thulesen Dahl. The DPP will almost certainly exploit the figures in future negotiations over the Danish economy.
On February 3, 2011, Jean Raspail, author of The Camp of the Saints was interviewed by Frédéric Taddeï on France 3 Television. The interview was recorded on two YouTube videos of about fifteen minutes each. The Camp of the Saints has been re-issued with a new preface : “Big Other”, a pun on “Big Brother”, and an obvious reference to the massive immigration of the past thirty years.
The videos, posted at François Desouche, are too long to translate, but here are a few highlights from the first half:
In truth The Camp of the Saints is a parable, written in 1972, published in 1973 about a million people from the Third World. They’re weak, they’re unarmed, women and children, they’re poor, and they come in search of paradise. But, there’s a million of them, they land on the Riviera, and behind them there are other flotillas with more millions ready to land according to whether or not France’s response is positive or negative. The problem of The Camp of the Saints is very simple – there is unity of time, place, and action. Everything happens in twenty-four hours. What happens is they have a shipwreck, a million of them, unarmed, weak, they inspire sympathy, pity. But a million… and if the response is positive, there are a million more waiting. What do we do? That’s the question posed by The Camp of the Saints.
Russia’s most wanted terrorist, Doku Umarov, has claimed he was the mastermind behind January’s bombing at Domodedovo Airport, which took the lives of 36 people and injured more than 180.
He sees all Western countries as enemies of Muslims and has been proven to have links to Al-Qaeda.
“Shortly after his meeting with European Union leaders, Obama offhandedly remarked: “This summit was not as exciting as other summits.”” ~ WND
This is unsurprising, considering the uncomfortableness that Obama seems to feel around Europeans and whites outside Europe. What Patrick Cleburne wrote in December of last year about the Nobel Peace Prize still applies today:
But why did Obama feel the need to be rude to Norway as a whole?
Norwegians are incensed over what they view as his shabby response to the prize by cutting short his visit.?The White House has cancelled many of the events peace prize laureates traditionally submit to, including a dinner with the Norwegian Nobel committee, a press conference, a television interview, appearances at a children’s event promoting peace and a music concert, as well as a visit to an exhibition in his honour at the Nobel peace centre. He has also turned down a lunch invitation from the King of Norway
The Nobel Peace Prize is tiny (population 4.6 Mm) Norway’s one moment in the international limelight (the other Nobel prizes are managed by Sweden). The ceremonies are standardized – Obama was asked to do nothing extra. Norway is only 6 time zones from Washington: with modern communications, hardly worse than Hawaii. Obama might feel less grateful than other recipients, but why boorishly shortchange the poor Norwegians?
He certainly has no difficulty abasing himself (and the country he personifies) before Crowned Heads – provided they are colored.
The reason is obvious and increasingly well known: Obama detests White European Christians – including Americans of that stock. Steve Sailer reports in Chapter 11 of America’s Half Blood Prince:
Obama’s first trip to Kenya (apparently in 1988, before he started at Harvard Law School) got off to an angry start, what with all the white people he kept running into. Initially, he stopped off for his three-week tour of the wonders of Europe that left him psychologically devastated because, “It just wasn’t mine.”
Increasingly, despite the efforts of the sycophantic MSM (which repressed Norway’s distress) America is realizing: He isn’t ours.
Congratulations to the Sweden Democrats, known for their tough anti-Third World immigration platform, for their election victories today. Imagine that: A pro-Swedish political party in Sweden. The anti-Western bureaucrats will be furious!
From the Swedish Wire:
The leader of the far-right Sweden Democrats celebrated winning seats in Sunday’s election and promised to not cause problems as near final results showed it could be a kingmaker in a hung parliament.
“We won’t cause problems. We will take responsibility. That is my promise to the Swedish people,” Jimmie Åkesson, who at 31 has already led the far-right since 2005, told a crowd of exhalted supporters as near final results handed him a score of 5.7 percent.
“I am overwhelmed and it is hard to collect my thoughts. Today, we have written political history,” he said as supporters chanted his name.
Åkesson recalled a though election, saying his party had been excluded from the public debate.
“We were exposed to censorship, we were exposed to a medieval boycott, they … excluded us. We were denied advertising in many newspapers, we were in every possible way treated as something other than a political party,” he scolded, sending a wave of booing through the crowd.
HT: Patrick Cleburne
Here’s the outstanding Sweden Democrats commercial that was recently banned in Sweden (which makes PC Republican commercials seem like milk-toast twaddle):