Category Archives: Immigration

Ebola in the news…

A concerted effort from the elites in the 1800s to deal with the problem of slavery and the Cheap Labor lobby ‘employees’, was focused on repatriation and colonization, in this case Liberia. A classmate of Yankee Copperhead, and Bowdoin graduate, Nathaniel Hawthorne, John Brown Russwurm was a leader in these organizations from the North, and the projects themselves were funded by various governments in the South.  Russwurm chose colonization over abolition—something Hawthorne, and his friend and fellow classmate, Franklin Pierce, would certainly have understood. Russwurm would become Governor of Liberia.

Today, coming full circle, the Refugee Racket has let Liberians resettle in the United States with plenty of bennies. One Liberian national (presumed at this point as one thinks the media would report otherwise if he wasn’t) with an Anglo-Saxon name, Thomas Eric Duncan, has brought Ebola into the state of Texas as the government has refused to block flights from the epicenter of the virus.

Worth noting, Senator Rand Paul, who has been good on the refugee racket, is speaking some sense on the Ebola situation.

 

Cameron to Scots: The bogeyman will get you if you secede!

Prime Minister David Cameron must REALLY be afraid the Scots will vote for self-determination. Not only is he resorting to scare tactics, but he’s spouting pure nonsense in a clumsy attempt to frighten Scots into rejecting self-rule:

David Cameron today warned that Scotland would be more at risk from terrorism if it votes for independence.

The Prime Minister said the United Kingdom had the best security and intelligence services in the world to keep people safe.

He said the safety of staying together in a ‘very dangerous and insecure world’ was one of the ‘strongest arguments’ against separation.

Boy, is Cameron desperate! Where was the “best security and intelligence services in the world” when Muslim terrorists bombed the London subway, killing 52 and wounding 700? And don’t forget – it was the British government that imported those murderers and then ignited their anger by invading Iraq.

And speaking of importing Muslim terrorists, let’s not overlook small-scale terror committed by Muslim immigrants, who not only recently beheaded an elderly lady, but managed to murder a British soldier in broad daylight. Anyone who doesn’t believe Muslim immigrants are a hostile and alien population should ask one of the 1,400 girls brutalized and exploited by Pakistani immigrants in Rotherham.

Scots should vote for independence just to separate themselves from lunatics like David Cameron.

Ethnic solidarity is good!

So says Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs … as long as it’s solidarity among the right people. Here, he posts a video that denounces Senator Marco Rubio for the horrendous crime of enforcing federal immigration laws. The video is entitled, “SEN MARCO RUBIO SIDES WITH HIS PARTY OVER HIS PEOPLE.”

Can you imagine how Prince Charles would sniff and scowl over a video that accused a White politician of working against his own people?

Jack Hunter and Rare.us Go PC on Border Crisis

This is pretty bad stuff. People worried about the border invasion are, of course, racists.

As I have said before, I like Jack Hunter, but he is unfortunately still trying to pay penance for his Southern Avenger days. No self-respecting conservative should make the charge of racism because it is a meaningless Trotskyite slur term that is meant to thoughtstop rather than illuminate. Perhaps what the town hall folks said was insensitive, but to use the r word is cheap. Since Jack likes wrestling, it’s the political equivalent of cheap heat. The issue of disease also misses the main point. The real issue is where are these kids parents. Kids from distant Central American countries don’t just show up in mass. This is part of a systematized program.

Murrieta Invasion Protests

From: “Murrieta[, California,] immigration protests: 6 arrested“. The Desert Sun.:

Ideology:

The two carried a small yellow sign that read, “Nation of immigrants.”

Compassion:

“These people are here because of foreign policy. They’re refugees.”

Suicidal Twisted Religion:

Linda Hendrickson said she’s here “strictly for religious reasons.”
“I’m here out of my religious duty,” she said, which is to help the poor and the oppressed.

Continue reading

Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs – Updated 2010

Mass immigration drives down wages, expands the wealth gap, reduces American security, draws on social services intended for citizens, and taxes the environment. The Third World remains unaided by the opening of America’s borders; the only tangible result is the ruination of our own quality of life.

America was never founded as a nation of immigrants. The Founders were slave-holding. Citizenship was originally restricted by ethnicity and religion and tied to the individual states, not to the federal government. The 1960 estimate is 85% white, the 1790 census shows 70% English, and the colonies precede 1776. Virginia Dare was born in 1587, in North Carolina.

However revolting such a past might be to some Americans, such is our true founding, our true history. There is no justification for opening our doors to mass immigration. Say no to The Last Chance Armada! Americans deserve a tolerable standard of living; America is a real nation with as much right to exist as has any other nation.

Reagan’s 1986 amnesty to 3 million illegal colonists has only encouraged more to enter from our south. If the dream is a nonwhite majority, such a future is already inevitable. The only beneficiary of mass immigration is big business.

Obama’s Two-Front War

Interesting, isn’t it, how tactics and objectives dovetail in D.C.’s ever-escalating war to impose multiculturalism at home and abroad? In defense of the principle of “inclusion” in Iraq, Obama is quietly ramping up efforts to prop up D.C.’s puppet regime in Baghdad:

Monday of this week, the first combat troops came, with the promise now shifting to a “no combat missions” one.

Even that seems absurd, as the Pentagon sends Apache attack helicopters into Iraq for the combat troops to use in these “non-combat” missions. The administration appears to recognize the unpopularity of a new Iraq War, but seems determined to escalate quietly until it is no longer a potential move to warn against, but a simple reality.

Similarly, Obama’s response to the invasion of our southwest border is to present defenders of traditional America with a fait accompli of a Third-World occupation that will impose “inclusiveness” on the American people:

“Either we’re going to enforce our laws and remain strong, economically or otherwise, or we ignore the rule of law and go to being a Third World country,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Republican, told Fox News. “You’ve got to follow the law. You cannot bring hundreds of thousands of people in this country without destroying the country. Then there’s no place that people can dream about coming.”

No one knows this better than Barack Obama. Making the United States over into a Third World country is exactly what this president is about. He is of the Third World. He spent his formative years in the Third World, and when his mother, obsessed with the Third World, brought him back to America, he sought out the company of those who dreamed of making America over into the world’s largest welfare state.

You have to feel for the patriotic protesters in Murietta standing up to the government’s importation of tax-consuming invaders. But they’re trying to defend a nation that NO LONGER EXISTS. It’s past time trying to reform D.C. and imagining we’re going to shame the federal government into protecting and representing us. That’s exactly the opposite of what the powers that be want.

It’s time for a hundred mighty secession movements to rise up and form governments that represent them and their interests. The first step is to recognize the utter illegitimacy of the corrupt regime in D.C. The good news is that only 21% of Americans believe the federal government is based on the consent of the governed. Do the math, and you’ll see that we’re half-way to the goal of self-determination.

Eric Cantor Falls to Shock Defeat

I love it. The Republicans have lost their Majority Leader because he supported amnesty. Hey, Republicans, think there’s a message in this somewhere? Huh?

It couldn’t have happened to a better sell-out. Here are the sweet details of Cantor’s major loss:

In one of the biggest political upsets in recent memory, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor lost his primary election on Tuesday to a political unknown who focused his campaign on Cantor’s support for a path to citizenship for the children of immigrants.

Randolph-Macon College economics professor Dave Brat won the Republican primary in Virginia’s 7th Congressional District. Brat had 56 percent of the vote to Cantor’s 44 percent when the Associated Press called the race just after 8 p.m.

See those numbers? This wasn’t even close. It demonstrates how powerful the anti-amnesty sentiment really is. Instead of blowing $60 million to win over imaginary conservative minority groups, the Republicans should spend that money standing up for border security and the rule of law. That is, if they WANT to win.

Two Roads Diverged in a Yellow Wood

UPDATE BELOW:

One thing’s for certain: The sea-to-shining-sea unity of pre-1965 America is gone, thanks to floodtide immigration, and it ain’t coming back. Numbers don’t lie.

So the question is, What do we do about it? It’s time for a massive political reorganization. There are two models we can use to guide us. One is a decentralized model with well-defined boundaries separating distinct groups, allowing autonomy within each unit; the other is the model of a powerful central government that must impose order on a mixed population. These two models are exemplified by the experience of Switzerland and Yugoslavia. Their histories are examined in this Public Library of Science paper. Here’s part of the Reader’s Digest version summarizing the Swiss model:

Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups, allowing for partial autonomy within a single country.

And then there’s Yugoslavia:

Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by physical and political boundaries. A similar analysis of the area of the former Yugoslavia shows that during widespread ethnic violence existing political boundaries did not coincide with the boundaries of distinct groups, but peace prevailed in specific areas where they did coincide. The success of peace in Switzerland may serve as a model to resolve conflict in other ethnically diverse countries and regions of the world.

Which should we choose? Well, I’m not one to try to sway opinions (what? me?) but let’s keep this in mind: Switzerland today is peaceful and prosperous, while Yugoslavia self-destructed in 1990.

Which shall it be? Which shall it be?

UPDATE:: This story from the Washington Times suggests which way DC plans to go: Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens

The Green March of 2014

Don’t look now, but we’re being overrun by illegal immigrants from Latin America. And no, this isn’t the opinion of VDare or FAIR but the New York Times:

Last weekend alone, more than 1,000 unaccompanied youths were being held at overflowing border stations in South Texas, officials said.

The flow of child migrants has been building since 2011, when 4,059 unaccompanied youths were apprehended by border agents. Last year more than 21,000 minors were caught, and Border Patrol officials had said they were expecting more than 60,000 this year. But that projection has already been exceeded.

By law, unaccompanied children caught crossing illegally from countries other than Mexico are treated differently from other migrants. After being apprehended by the Border Patrol, they must be turned over within 72 hours to a refugee resettlement office that is part of the Health Department.

What’s the one fool-proof, most direct way to create a pro-socialist, pro-immigration majority in this country? Simple – just import a new people that will support such an agenda. Demographic revolution isn’t anything new. In 1975, an unarmed exodus of Moroccans was able to tip the scales in favor of what was once Spanish Sahara to become part of Morocco:

The Green March was a mass trek of 350,000 Moroccans into Western Sahara (former Spanish Sahara) on November 6, 1975 to claim the mostly desert territory from a regional insurgency and to declare control over the territory as a contiguous and connected subset of a “Greater Morocco.” The “march” allowed the Moroccan state to triumph over countries in the Western Sahara region, which was contested by the Polisario Front, an acronym for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el-Hamra and Río de Oro (Frente Popular de Liberación de Saguía el Hamra y Río de Oro), a national liberation organization formed by Moroccan students of Sahrawi descent. While neighboring Algeria and Mauritania claimed the territory, the Green March proved decisive in consolidating a large territory of 103,000 square miles with fewer than 500,000 people composed of Sahrawi and Moroccan descendants. The goal of Moroccan King Hassan II was to present the world with a fait accompli occupation that would be irreversible.

I can just hear the Koch Brothers, Mark Zuckerberg, and all the other billionaires sniggering with delight at the prospect of all that cheap, exploitable labor rushing into their arms.

#BringBackOurGirls

Anything, anywhere in the world that’s bad MUST be made right by the Doers of Good ® in DC. That makes everything and everyone DC’s business. Michelle Obama heartily agrees it’s her husband’s duty to rescue Nigerian girls kidnapped by, uh, mysterious extremists of no discernible religious views:

Michelle Obama has taken the unique step of delivering her husband’s weekly presidential address to express outrage at the kidnapping of the Nigerian schoolgirls. …

“I want you to know that Barack has directed our government to do everything possible to support the Nigerian government’s efforts to find these girls and bring them home. In these girls, Barack and I see our own daughters. We see their hopes, their dreams, and we can only imagine the anguish their parents are feeling right now.”

Why, these girls could be Trayvon’s sisters.

Since no crisis should go to waste, what do you want to bet this kidnapping becomes the justification for importing a few dozen boatloads of Nigerian immigrants? After all, we have limitless capacity here in this country, and it is our obligation to do whatever we can for OUR GIRLS. Because America.

‘Asian carp’ gets a makeover in Minn. Senate

Lord help me, this country is going insane. Here’s the proof: Fearful the term “Asian carp” may be “hurtful” to some, a legislator in Minnesota is proposing changing the name to “invasive carp.”

But wait – why should we demean the Asian carp as “invasive” just because it’s taking over the Mississippi and Great Lakes, forcing out native species? After all, fish are fish. We should refer to the Asian carp as an “undocumented fish.” No fish is illegal.

Ukraine: Who Benefits?

Background: Under Putin, Russia has moved right, and with the move garnered popularity among America’s Far-Right.

The Ukraine conflict, however, pits Russians against “fascist” Ukrainians, pulling Russians away from conservative ideas.

And in America, the conflict distracts conservatives from the looming immigration amnesty that’s being pushed through the House, by both parties. The Ukraine conflict furthermore divides less-informed conservative Americans from conservative Putin, whom they blame for the conflict; and the conflict unites natives with immigrants, “[diverse] Americans” against “[diverse] Russians”.

In short: The spirit of Cosmopolitanism wins.

We might not be able to save the Ukraine from Washington’s meddling, but we can perhaps thwart amnesty. The National Defense Authorization Act is up for vote next week. It could contain amnesty, according to NumbersUSA. How did a foreign affairs post turn to immigration? Immigration is the most relevant to American interests. D.C. threatens all of us, but it threatens America most with amnesty.

The North Worth Saving” by Dr. Trifkovic (Serbian) is worth reading for those here seeking a geopolitical view that makes sense. Such isn’t a call for uniting politically. It’s simply a view of common interests, common civilisation, common people.

The international hypocrite

Vox Day cites that notoriously “neo-Confederate” propaganda mill known as the New York Times on the explosive issue of secession in Crimea. The editorial writers at the Times are having a little difficulty making sense of Obama’s opposition to a popular referendum on Crimea seceding from Ukraine:

Consider the different American views of recent bids for independence.

Chechnya? No.

East Timor? Yes.

Abkhazia? No.

South Sudan? Yes.

Palestine? It’s complicated.

It is an acutely delicate subject in the West, where Britain wants to keep Scotland and Spain wants to keep Catalonia.

To which Vox Day adds:

And the USA murdered hundreds of thousands in order to forcibly “keep the Union together” and deny the sovereign Southern States their right to self-determination. This has not escaped the attention of the world’s second-rate powers, some of whom have indicated support for the Russian position.

What the ruling elite can’t grasp is that the peoples of the world do not share their globalist vision. Crimea has a majority Russian population that does not want to be part of Ukraine. This is just one more problem caused by the anti-human policies of the old Soviet Union. And it wasn’t just the Reds who violated natural borders; the West is largely to blame for the unnatural and unsustainable political lines drawn in Africa during colonial times. As the folks in Sudan recently made clear, those borders are being redefined by history and culture.

The lessons of this worldwide trend apply here, too. As our rulers in DC import a more docile population from the Third World, the actual result is not a flowering of diversity but a loss of identification and loyalty to the old American nation. Already, secession is gaining steam in America, and ethnic and racial divisions are openly recognized as the reason. No people anywhere in the world wants to be governed by others – self-determination is just another term for secession. So as DC continues to reconstruct the old America, look for REAL secession movements to arise here at home.

Coke Relents on its America the Beautiful Commercial – Sort of

Coke’s America the Beautiful ad has been praised by the boosters of multiculturalism, but it has also been harshly criticized by many flyover country yahoos who know a dis when they see it. Coke has apparently heard the criticism and is modifying the ad slightly to include the phrase E Pluribus Unum in Latin and English.

The ad is self-contradictory, as any person willing to look can tell. It features Jews and Muslims who based on attire seem to be at least somewhat observant. Well I have news for Coke, those groups have a history of not getting along. It has what has been widely assumed to be a gay couple. It shouldn’t be news to Coke that observant Jews and Muslims don’t have much use for homosexuals. So it could be argued that what the ad actually suggests is not so much the tired mantra that “diversity is our strength,” as “come to America and we’ll liberalize the diversity out of you and make you into a good little amorphous consumers just like the rest of us.” They’re won’t be any conflict if everyone is taught that their ethnicity, culture, religion, etc. are largely irrelevant or at least not worth differing about.

While I don’t think the addition of E Pluribus Unum helps that much if at all, it’s encouraging that Coke has heard the criticism and that many were willing to speak out despite being called names by the promoters of multiculturalism.

Group Opposes Amnesty Supporter Dr. Russell Moore

We would like to direct your attention to a group dedicated to opposing the amnesty supporting antics of Dr. Russell Moore and his Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) of the Southern Baptist Convention. The group is ERLC Watch.

Their website is here.

Follow them on Twitter here.

They have been giving Dr. Moore a much deserved hard time of late, especially on Twitter.

We need a dictator!

David Brooks is frustrated. Congress won’t grant amnesty to all those potential Americans “hiding in the shadows,” it can’t pass gun control, and it hasn’t given us any fun wars lately. Brooks is also disappointed by the American public’s lack of enthusiasm for DC’s military adventures. Members of Congress, always mindful of the next election, aren’t about to further alienate voters. That makes Brooks sad. Brooks, a thorough Neocon, gleefully backed the Iraq War as a means to achieve “national greatness.” To him, a strong central government is the answer to everything, since, in his own words, “ultimately, American purpose can find its voice only in Washington.”

The solution? Brooks says it’s time for the president to assume more power and get things rolling again. Here’s his argument, from an opinion piece entitled Strengthen the Presidency:

Here are the advantages. First, it is possible to mobilize the executive branch to come to policy conclusion on something like immigration reform. It’s nearly impossible for Congress to lead us to a conclusion about anything. Second, executive branch officials are more sheltered from the interest groups than Congressional officials. Third, executive branch officials usually have more specialized knowledge than staffers on Capitol Hill and longer historical memories. Fourth, Congressional deliberations, to the extent they exist at all, are rooted in rigid political frameworks.

What should Obama do, in Brooks’s opinion? Simple: “So how do you energize the executive? It’s a good idea to be tolerant of executive branch power grabs and to give agencies flexibility.”

Yeah — nothing like a few “executive branch power grabs” to liven things up.

Don’t dismiss this as just the ravings of a typical government supremacist. What Brooks is advocating is a very real, very frightening possibility. Obama is already taking steps to do exactly what Brooks is talking about. Obama has appointed long-time DC insider John Podesta to his senior staff. Podesta has long been an open advocate of a powerful chief executive. In a Center for American Progress paper in 2010 entitled, “The Power of the President: Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change,” Podesta wrote: “Concentrating on executive powers presents a real opportunity for the Obama administration to turn its focus away from a divided Congress and the unappetizing process of making legislative sausage.”

Liberty activists should fear this man. Podesta’s progressive ideology is a blueprint for the welfare-warfare state:

In 2008, Podesta authored his book The Power of Progress: How America’s Progressives Can (Once Again) Save Our Economy, Our Climate, and Our Country. In it, he articulates a vision of progressive values based on four core lessons: 1) Progressives stand with people, not privilege; 2) Progressives believe in the Common Good and a government that offers a hand up; 3) Progressives hold that all people are equal in the eyes of God and under the law; and 4) Progressives stand for universal human rights and cooperative global security.

(Catch that last line? And some people don’t believe me when I argue that civil rights and militarism are DC’s yin and yang.) Like all DC insiders, John Podesta knows how to deploy his noble-sounding ideals to turn a buck:

Since President Obama entered office in 2008, Boeing has spent $840,000 on The Podesta Group’s services, relying on the firm to lobby in favor of lucrative defense appropriations at the White House and on Capitol Hill.

What can we expect from Obama in the coming months? More wars, more forced multiculturalism, more authoritarian government.

In other words, what we can expect from ANY administration.

Perils of a Porous Border

The Open Borders crowd would have us believe that the only people who oppose dismantling the border fences are crabby xenophobes. Are there legitimate reasons for keeping our eyes open and powder dry at our borders? This article makes the case for taking border security seriously, and it turns out to be a powerful one:

Protecting the 1,954-mile Mexico-U.S. border, as some pundits assert, is not just an economic issue, or a problem of criminal drug trafficking and gun running. It threatens America’s national security. In an August 13, 2013 op/ed in The Washington Times, Retired Admiral James Lyons, who was senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations, stated, “Fixing our porous borders is one of combating the threat of terrorism that America faces. In the various efforts to reform the U.S. immigration system, often overlooked in the debate is its impact on national security.”

The statistics are alarming: according to an August 1, 2011 investigative report in the Columbus Dispatch, the United Nations estimates that 97 percent of the illegal immigrants who enter the U.S. clandestinely do so across the U.S.-Mexican border. However, only 20 percent of illegal aliens are caught. Smuggling illegal aliens across the border is now a $6.6 billion industry for Mexican crime syndicates.

If Israel and Saudi Arabia can enforce their immigration laws, so can we.

Who’ll Stand for the Working American?

But the fruits of their labor
Are worth more than their pay
And it’s time a few of them were recognized – Alabama

Speaker John Boehner schemes on how to grant amnesty.

President Obama schemes on passing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which EIC warns could involve 40% of the world’s economy.

China gains in the high-value segment of American market.

Who’ll stand for the working American?

Quotes from former US Senator Fritz Hollings, SC:

“The U. S. was founded in a trade war. The Mother Country prohibited manufacture in the colony, and the Navigation Act of 1651 required the colony’s exports to be carried in English bottoms.” Source.

“We now have the export profile of an eighteenth century colony.” Source.