Comments on: Neoconservative Bobby Jindal is Weak on Immigration

By: D B Allyn

D B Allyn — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:35 +0000

What I want to know is how the hell Louisiana ended up with a dam Indian for Governor ? It was the influx of these type of people that helped push the demise of my country.

Then again, how did the USA end up with a black or at least mongrel President ?

By: Neocon Bobby Jindal: Conform to Political Correctness Or Else! | Conservative Heritage Times

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:59:30 +0000

[...] Fox News tonight, I saw the Republican Governor of Louisiana, Piyush Jindal (aka “Bobby” Jindal), moaning and whining over JOP Keith Bardwell’s [...]

By: Old Atlantic

Old Atlantic — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:18:27 +0000

Fellist, Gandhi quote is brilliant find. We need to use it over and over.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf

“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.” Nagylaki Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.

Those for immigration are for genetic replacement, its a theorem.

By: fellist

fellist — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:23:02 +0000

RonL, I’m using one of Gandhi’s *good* arguments to promote the interests of all peoples, but my own especially. I use Gandhi because he, like Jindal is east Indian, but more than that because Gandhi is widely considered a figure of universal moral significance, so using one of his arguments to make the case against the dispossession of Euro-man makes things tricky for proponents of Euro-replacement immigration.

The universality of the quotation is the important thing: when Gandhi says “England belongs to the English” because ALL native peoples have the same rights, many people who habitually think of these rights as only attaching to non-White peoples are prompted to think again.

Only for you does that quotation seem to be about Palestinians only, and only you (and your kind) would use it to launch an attack on Indians who didn’t ethnically cleanse all Muslims from India. And Nazis! Palestinians rarely enter my thoughts – the quote was clearly a springboard to a defence of the American people – but we know which people alone you are concerned with, and it ain’t Americans..

By: RonL

RonL — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:17:12 +0000

Fellist,

Does everything revolve around Palestinians for you?

As for Ghandi, he was a piss poor conservative. He is the reason there are so many Muslims left in India.
The man who thought the British and Nazis were equivalent deserves no acknowledgment in a civilized society.

By: Weaver

Weaver — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:24:45 +0000

Jake, who gains from the “Republican Party” taking power as you speak of?

There’s simply no point. Jindal won’t significantly slow the demographic transformation of the US state… What you propose is essentially that America become Brazil, and learn to like it. Those who don’t like Brazil are “senseless morons.”

Well, I like America; and folks who like Brazil… ought to move there.

By: Jake

Jake — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:07:45 +0000

This is pure nonsense. Jindal is strong on immigration and Rodolfo, who is clearly not American himself, is just afraid of the GOP coming back to win its place. The more prejudice the Republican party takes place in the worse it’ll do. The nation is changing demographically and the GOP needs to be able to adjust and bring in new voting blocs. Jindal’s the guy the party needs to bring it away from senseless moronism and to breed a new open, intellectually grounded party. Palin or the other wack jobs wont cut it for the future unfortunately.

By: fellist

fellist — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:02:13 +0000

You know, Gandhi once felt so secure about the English people’s sense of ownership of England that he could free-ride it to make a third party nationalist argument. He wasn’t even making the case for his own Indian nationalism – which I suspect ‘Bobby’ Jindal wholeheartedly supports.

In 1938, when Palestinian Arabs were being systematically disposessed by Jewish immigrants, Gandhi said:

“Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct”.

The question for American voters and anti-racists everywhere is: does Rep. Jindal agree in principle with Gandhi’s nationalism? That is, does India belong to the Indians, England to the English, and America to the American people?

If ‘Bobby’ Jindal sides with Gandhi in opposing imperialist race-replacement, he’ll side with the American people who don’t want to be invaded and dispossessed. If he goes against Gandhi’s principles, we’ll know what to call him: an ethnocidist.

By: Rodolfo Brennero

Rodolfo Brennero — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:24:41 +0000

Bobby Jindal is absolutely NOT a TRUE American and you know why. This means he will NEVER be able to think and act honestly (not even 10%) for the interests of TRUE Americans. His first allegiance is for India or Pakistan (pronounced Phuckistan), and then for other darkies like him. So, MANY MORE incompatible immigrants to come.

The 10 generations TRUE European-descent Americans (soon a minority) MUST go back to the drawing board to review who they are, were they come from, and why they became and still are (not for long) the greatest nation in the world and in history of the world. Then decide where to proceed in the future right after they get rid of all parasites, even those ENEMIES that they look like themselves (or very close).

If you don’t, your children shall inherit a garbage hell. Do you TRUE Americans really care about your children?

CIAO !

VALE BENE. CURA UT VALEAS.

Rodolfo

By: roho

roho — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:08:54 +0000

“Camp of the Saints Jindal”……………I love it.

Immigration for me is a non-negotiable issue, and one of the reasons that McAmnesty could never have my vote.

I like your focus Bede. NOTHING compares to the candidates “Historical Voting Record”…….All else is simply salesmanship and flip-flopping.

By: Andrew T.

Andrew T. — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:26:17 +0000

“How do American voters fall for such politicians?”

It would be politically incorrect not to.

By: Weaver

Weaver — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:41:02 +0000

The US needs jobs and capital, not more workers, not to mention the social damage immigration does.

How do American voters fall for such politicians?

—

Bobby “Camp of the Saints” Jindal is brilliant!