<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitution Day TEA Party Event Excludes Constitution Party Candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservativetimes.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedPhillips</title>
		<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399&#038;cpage=1#comment-48858</link>
		<dc:creator>RedPhillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399#comment-48858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Besides, my main point was that Glenn Lord was excluding the CP candidate because HE thinks third parties are a bad idea. Well good for him if he does, but what Glenn Lord personally thinks shouldn&#039;t be definitive for the TEA Party as a whole which he supposedly represents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, my main point was that Glenn Lord was excluding the CP candidate because HE thinks third parties are a bad idea. Well good for him if he does, but what Glenn Lord personally thinks shouldn&#8217;t be definitive for the TEA Party as a whole which he supposedly represents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedPhillips</title>
		<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399&#038;cpage=1#comment-48857</link>
		<dc:creator>RedPhillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399#comment-48857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tacitus, I am not on a &quot;quest&quot; to do anything. I have what I think is a very nuanced and balanced view of the role of third parties in our current system as I outline here.

http://conservativetimes.org/?p=5703

Briefly, the role of third parties in our current system is not to win but to punish unfaithful members of the major party closest to your view. But you can&#039;t cast a protest vote for a third party candidate to punish a major party candidate if the third parties don&#039;t exist. So someone has to do the thankless job of maintaining the third party, recruiting candidates, getting them on the ballot, etc. One could believe that reforming one of the major parties and working &quot;within the system&quot; is the long term strategy more likely to be effective and still understand the utility of third parties. By denouncing third parties outright you are taking away one of the potential vehicles for promoting reform from within. 

Also, it is not a &quot;wasted vote&quot; if it is cast thoughtfully and strategically to bring about a desired end, such as punishing one of the major party nominees for their deviations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tacitus, I am not on a &#8220;quest&#8221; to do anything. I have what I think is a very nuanced and balanced view of the role of third parties in our current system as I outline here.</p>
<p><a href="http://conservativetimes.org/?p=5703" rel="nofollow">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=5703</a></p>
<p>Briefly, the role of third parties in our current system is not to win but to punish unfaithful members of the major party closest to your view. But you can&#8217;t cast a protest vote for a third party candidate to punish a major party candidate if the third parties don&#8217;t exist. So someone has to do the thankless job of maintaining the third party, recruiting candidates, getting them on the ballot, etc. One could believe that reforming one of the major parties and working &#8220;within the system&#8221; is the long term strategy more likely to be effective and still understand the utility of third parties. By denouncing third parties outright you are taking away one of the potential vehicles for promoting reform from within. </p>
<p>Also, it is not a &#8220;wasted vote&#8221; if it is cast thoughtfully and strategically to bring about a desired end, such as punishing one of the major party nominees for their deviations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patroon</title>
		<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399&#038;cpage=1#comment-48855</link>
		<dc:creator>Patroon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399#comment-48855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;People&#039;s Tea Party? You&#039;ve got to be kidding me?! Who&#039;s the one who need&#039;s legitimacy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;People&#8217;s Tea Party? You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me?! Who&#8217;s the one who need&#8217;s legitimacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tacitus</title>
		<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399&#038;cpage=1#comment-48854</link>
		<dc:creator>Tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399#comment-48854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s far more useful for the Tea Party to bring the GOP to the right than it is for it to bring the CP to legitimacy, which is impossible. I don&#039;t understand your quixotic quest to promote third parties. While the country becomes more polarized, and more people express dislike with both parties, third parties have, paradoxically, performed even WORSE!  Look at the voting record. The &quot;wasted vote&quot;&#039;argument is, and will be, definitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s far more useful for the Tea Party to bring the GOP to the right than it is for it to bring the CP to legitimacy, which is impossible. I don&#8217;t understand your quixotic quest to promote third parties. While the country becomes more polarized, and more people express dislike with both parties, third parties have, paradoxically, performed even WORSE!  Look at the voting record. The &#8220;wasted vote&#8221;&#8216;argument is, and will be, definitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock Townsend</title>
		<link>http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399&#038;cpage=1#comment-48852</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Townsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativetimes.org/?p=6399#comment-48852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
