Anybody who needs evidence of the degeneration of popular culture in America need only compare the SciFi Channel’s politically-corrected and metrosexualized-yuppie version of Flash Gordon to the wonderful classic kids’ cartoon put out in the late 70′s – early 80′s.
Note that the newer, PC-version goes out of its way to cast an Anglo as Ming the Merciless; otherwise some might think we’re prejudiced against Persian/Oriental despotism.
Only right-wing Europeans can be tyrants, as one can tell by Ming’s spiffy new fascist uniform. Frankly I don’t know why they didn’t just rename him Jean-Marie or Hermann or something.
Who says Hillary is just another DC insider who’s going to prop up the military/industrial regime? Hillary:
Clinton further displayed tough talk in an interview airing on “Good Morning America” Tuesday. ABC News’ Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.
“I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran,” Clinton said. “In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.”
It’s a good thing the United States won the Cold War. Otherwise, the Soviet Union would’ve imposed totalitarianism on us, and every election would offer nothing but fake choices between pro-government candidates.
By the way, this makes the second presidential candidate to endorse the Krauthammer Doctrine. And we can count on McCain to nuke Iran no matter what they do.
Frosty Wooldridge’s latest:
Russell Seitz — a contributor whose primary contribution has been to mock opposition to Darwinism per Richard Dawkins — has now taken issue with Tom Piatak’s lack of good humor regarding the recent shenanigans of a Yale art student.
The discussion has turned pretty gruesome already — one of the respondents, “G.S.” seems unable to avoid using extensive vulgarity.
Prepare to have your illusions of security shattered. This is the most jarring, as well as the most important, article I’ve seen in years, and readers of this blog will know I don’t toss such claims lightly.
Here’s the thesis: All empires fail. The Soviet Union was better positioned to fail than the United States, which has almost zero resources to rely on when systemic failure hits. Continue reading
Remember a month back I was talking about Minnesota’s forgotten corners and the ghost towns in the rural,Â northwest part of the state?
Well according to this article inÂ MinneapolisÂ Star-Tribune (Part I of a multi-part series) suburbia is starting to empty out to thanks to the housingÂ crisis. Whole subdivisions are being abandoned by people who can’t afford their homes and local government and banks now have the pick up the tab for upkeep and security just to keep any kind of value to the homes, otherwise they become as blighted as any inner-city neighbordhood.
Imagine suburbia turning into Detroit, where whole neighborhoods are abandond except for the very and are overgrown with vegitation, the breakdown of a civilization.Â Even see the movie Wolfen? (one the best horror movies of all time IMHO).Â It could become like that.
I’m leaving Tuesday for the Constitution Party Convention in Kansas City. I will be casting my vote for Chuck Baldwin. (There’s a shocker.) I don’t know how much access to the Internet I will have. If I do, I will try to keep y’all posted.
Hopefully I won’t be persona non grataÂ due toÂ all my Internet trouble making.
Constitution Party Chairman, Jim Clymer, welcomes Alan Keyes to the Constitution Party.
…Clymer added, saying: â€œ We encourage Dr. Keyes and his supporters to discover thereâ€™s a perfect fit for them. We no longer have to endure elected officials who defy the will of the people. There is an option in the Constitution Party.â€
This is the kind of stuff that is driving me crazy about the Keyes/Constitution Party mess. KEYES IS NOT A “PERFECT FIT” and they know it. I can understand the desire to welcome new members. I can see the utility in praising any right-wing break from the GOP. But this “perfect fit” stuff just confuses the matter. We are in the middle of a battle royal precisely because Keyes is not a “perfect fit.” This sort of happy talk does not reflect reality, andÂ itÂ further adds toÂ the Keyes supporters legitimate grievances when he is denied the nomination.Â When all is said and done won’t theyÂ have grounds to object “but you said…”?
Larison has a good post on Eunomia as to why most Republicans, even if they wanted to, don’t choose the antiwar position.
Only the loss of all power by the GOP can eliminate any excuses they might have about the war and their electoral prospects and only the loss of the White House could prevent the kind “change in stratgey ploy” the Bush II Administration effectively used to keep GOP support. Ron Paul was right in his feeling that a lot of war support in Republican circles is simple party loyalty and loyalty to the President. No President, no more war to support andÂ in my opinion that’s where the antiwar sentiment and change in GOP foreign policyÂ can make its pitch.
By: Les Riley, Mississippi Constitution Party
Two weeks ago, I caused quite a stir by writing a piece on my personal blog stating my personal opposition to the candidacy of Alan Keyes for the Constitution Party presidential nomination. I posted this on my personal blog and made it clear that this was not an official statement from the Mississippi Constitution Party or the National Committee of the CP. Since then, we have held our state convention & voted in a non-binding poll to support Chuck Baldwin as our first choice & Don Grundman as our second, but we left it to our delegation to the National Convention to vote on our behalf. My little article on my little blog has since been a subject of discussion on Third Party Watch, on a pro-Alan Keyes Discussion forum, and in a whole series of e-mails two and about me. Also, a number of other state party leaders & activists have voiced their opposition to the nomination of Ambassador Keyes.
Some of his supporters have stated that I misunderstood or intentionally misrepresented Mr. Keyesâ€™ positions. I invited one of them to attend our state convention & clarify/ repudiate what I had said, but never heard back from him. I sent Mr. Keyesâ€™ National Campaign Director, Tom Hoefling, an e-mail saying that I would be willing to allow him to explain where I was mistaken about where I believe Keyesâ€™ positions are not in keeping with the principles or platform of the CP.I am often wrong and when I am not, I often state my case too boldly. As a follower of Christ, when this is the case, I want to be humble & quick to apologize and publicly correct my error. Thus far explanations or repudiations of my initial concerns have not been given â€“ beyond : a) assertions that I do not know what I am talking about; and b) questions about my â€œreal motivesâ€ that are so ridiculous & offensive that I will not dignify them with a response.
James Antle III has this story about Keyes’ problems with the CP at the American Spectator online. It is well worth a read despite my shameless self-promotion.
Is Keyes cooked? “What you run into are a lot of single-issue pro-lifers who view Alan Keyes as a positive name,” says Red Phillips, a paleoconservative who opposes Keyes’s nomination. Phillips also worries that other party members will want a well known presidential candidate. “There’s talk about us crossing the million vote threshold if we nominate Keyes,” he says. “I don’t think that’s very realistic, since not even Pat Buchanan got a million votes [as the Reform Party nominee] in 2000.”
Ron Paulâ€™s Amazing Confusion
This article is well targeted at the Paulians who seem to believe free trade is somehow not globalist.
The general philosophy of free trade, as detailed and explained by the Austrian economists and libertarian philosophers that we all know he has read and adores, is designed to create a â€œone world, ecumenical, indissoluble unionâ€ (Bastiat). Free trade is supported by David Rockefeller, Robert Pastor, the Bushâ€™s, the Clintonâ€™s, every international bank, every multi-national corporation, every international organization, every international governmental structure; in short it is the common thread of agreement for all proponents of globalization and one world government. Why would Ron Paul align himself with these enemies of our system and our nation? Continue reading
Bill Kauffman perfectly describes all three presidential candidates as rootless ideolouges and cosmopolitans in the CounterPunch.org article. Citizens of the World tend to make poor presidents.
If we as a society cannot agree upon a definition of Art, that’s fine.
But why then should Society be compelled to subsidize something, if no one can tell us what it is?
Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body.
This passage from a post on Eunomia today sums up the whole “bittergate” controversy well.Â I highlight in bold the “money” quote.Â Good work Mr. Larison:
Here’s a couple of recent submissions to CHT from several writers:
Â Rev. Chuck BaldwinÂ writesÂ Â about Christian idolatry.
Frosty Wooldridge calls the Department of Homeland Security a complete fraud
Not even the most powerful store on the planet will be able to stop the rise in prices on Chinese good as explained in this article on Slate today:
Alan Keyes’ “big announcement” yesterday was that he is leaving theÂ RepublicanParty and may join the Constitution Party and may seek their nomination for President. He did not say he is joining the CP and the Convention is a week away.
I have been thinking this might happen for a while. Keyes can not afford to seek and lose the nomination of a minor party. It would end him as a credible candidate forever. And I don’t think he can win. There is too much opposition, and Chuck Baldwin is such a well liked and acceptable nominee to almost everyone.
Keyes needs to humbly join the Party with the understanding that the Party is non-interventionist. Then he needs to begin rethinking his foreign policy positions. Hopefully, he will see the light and become a non-interventionism promoting member ofÂ our non-interventionist party. There is no reason Keyes can’t change. Ron Paul changed the hearts and minds of many people, so it can happen.
Alan Keyes says he’s no longer a Republicans but has not yet decided to join the Constitution Party or enterÂ the fray for its Presidential nomination.
The whole big build-up for his big announcement of his switch perfectly sums upÂ the man: nothing but hot air.