April
12th 2012
Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under Lincoln & Obama

This can’t possibly be true! Obama is a liberal Democrat! But most of all, he HAS to be on the people’s side because he isn’t white. The most learned political theorists have proven whites are reactionary, while blacks are progressive.

I’m all befuddled. No one could have seen this coming…

… unless … they paid attention to the fact that Wall Street has showered Obama with contributions.

Sayyyy … that sounds familiar. An ambitious politician expands the central government and the office of president for the benefit of big business, while claiming he’s a man of “the people.” Hasn’t this act been done before?

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | chatintamil

4 Comments »

4 Responses to “Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush”

  1. roho on 12 Apr 2012 at 6:37 pm #

    Obama’s narcistic mind perceives himself to be an Emperer to the World, with the responsibility to bring the US down to the world’s standard. It is China’s time and we must step asside, and step into the trashbin of history…………He is a globalist in it’s purest form.

  2. TS on 12 Apr 2012 at 7:21 pm #

    writing slavery out of the Civil War? hmmm.

  3. HarrisonBergeron2 on 13 Apr 2012 at 1:52 am #

    roho,

    I agree he wants to knock middle-class Americans down a few notches, but the wealthy elite will clearly reap the benefits. I think the real goal is world domination.

  4. HarrisonBergeron2 on 13 Apr 2012 at 1:53 am #

    TS,

    No, just avoiding the Empire’s self-serving propaganda.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply