March
12th 2013
More Rand Paul Reax
RedPhillips

Posted under Conservatism & Interventionism & NeoCons & Paleoconservatism & Rand Paul

Because the Rand Paul dead horse still needs more beating:

Daniel Laison comments on “Movement Conservative Reactions…”

Larison’s comments are in response to this article by Jim Antle.

Aaron Wolfe on the reaction of National Review. Aaron, quoting Sam Francis, makes an important point here. Neocons (and mainstream conservatives in general) have always taken a dim view of extremism qua extremism?

James Kirkpatrick at VDARE takes a more critical view of Rand.

Pat Buchanan asks “Who Now Speaks for the GOP?…

Justin Raimondo appears to have climbed aboard the Rand train. See here and here. Before he was highly critical of Rand.

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | chatintamil

1 Comment »

One Response to “More Rand Paul Reax”

  1. C Bowen on 12 Mar 2013 at 10:24 pm #

    James Kirkpatrick is a serious political paleocon.

    He doesn’t write about how he feels, he gets on with explaining tactics to aid his chosen issues.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply