February
27th 2008
If the NAU is a myth, then why was this agreement signed?
Patroon

Posted under NAU

Jerome Corsi asks this question in an article for WND after an agreement was signed by the U.S. and Canada allowing troops from either nation, with the approval of their respective governments to be used to police “domestic disturbances”, “national emergencies” and other euphemisms across the northern border. In other words, if riots took place Seattle (WTO riots for example, remember those?) then Canadian troops could police Seattle streets.

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | chatintamil

5 Comments »

5 Responses to “If the NAU is a myth, then why was this agreement signed?”

  1. roho on 27 Feb 2008 at 8:58 pm #

    Thank you Patroon!…………..But, be warned that those who have drank the “Political Correct Juice” will now label you a “Conspiracy Nut”!…….There are those true “Patriots” that I respect in Canada that appose this INSANITY as much as we do! They are also fighting the good fight to protect and save their Soverignty as well! A good Canadian site to monitor on many issues regarding this INSANITY is found at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8082

    It may or may not post but it’s globalresearch.com. Even the Canadian liberals have enough sense to see what is going on in the Bush Administration, and by not being OWNED by AIPAC like our Democratic liberals in Washington, much of the truth filters through! Canada is not sitting on a multi-trillion dollar military industrial complex, so the Globalist-MSM-Power Brokers have no intrest in controlling their Government as much as ours.(For the time being)…………….Great, (Un-censored news and info)comes out of this site because the U.S. doesn’t think Americans look at Non-American sites!…………….Welcome to the frustrated world of conspiracy nuts.

  2. Harold Crews on 27 Feb 2008 at 9:14 pm #

    The Canadians are getting the worse of the deal. I don’t think Canada has the military or even the population to increase the military to a size to put down widespread civil ‘disturbances’ in the US. They would be used at most for surgical strikes or as a spearpoint for the beginnings of civil ‘disturbances’. A similar thing was done about ten years ago or so to train Hong Kong police to disarm US citizens, if I remember correctly. However the US however could occupy Canada. Canada and Iraq have about the same population size. It also has much easier controlled borders.

  3. roho on 27 Feb 2008 at 9:15 pm #

    Thanks Patroon!………You have now joined the ranks of us “Conspiracy Nuts”. The Canadian Patriots that love their own soverignty are fighting as we are, and they are getting a lot of info out as a result of AIPAC not owning their liberals!(Because they don’t sit on a trillion dollar military industrial complex, they have no value!)…….So, unlike our MSM, information is flowing. A good site to monitor is http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8082

    The U.S. Government controls media in the U.S. but, Canada is not yet a high priority on the “PROPOGANDA MACHINE”.

  4. roho on 27 Feb 2008 at 10:11 pm #

    Sorry about the double post……….It did not respond as normal?

  5. love the girls on 28 Feb 2008 at 3:06 am #

    This water passed under the bridge when the Feds were recognized as having authority at the local level.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply