Boy! That’s some messed up logic…………….Good decisions are a learned experience from a guide/mentor….Children often make bad decisions who have been abandoned by a quality mentor and simply left to guess for the right decision. THe last thing that they need is a poor mentor that recomends bad decisions. And, of course trial and error can be a very dangerous system in many decisions for all ages.
That’s why we have an “Owners Manual”…………………….The Bible.
Wow, even my college professors don’t implicitly despise middle America this much.
This joke of a candidate, though a doctor, obviously has not the most elementary grasp of sociology or child development, departments from which I’m sure her human-zombifying abstractions would be laughed out of.
But good common sense couldn’t possibly discredit her position any more strongly. She obviously doesn’t understand how physiologically impossible it is in the most literal sense for underage children to understand sex enough to make a sovereign decision; if this woman has kids, I bet they’re really messed up right about now. Plus, government’s most fundamental pillar is the law code that it has. Unless arbitrary age limits that are assumed to flatly apply are written into the regional law code for issues such as these, the result will be endless judicial tyranny.
roho on 24 Apr 2008 at 9:09 pm #
Boy! That’s some messed up logic…………….Good decisions are a learned experience from a guide/mentor….Children often make bad decisions who have been abandoned by a quality mentor and simply left to guess for the right decision. THe last thing that they need is a poor mentor that recomends bad decisions. And, of course trial and error can be a very dangerous system in many decisions for all ages.
That’s why we have an “Owners Manual”…………………….The Bible.
Andrew T. on 25 Apr 2008 at 2:11 am #
Wow, even my college professors don’t implicitly despise middle America this much.
This joke of a candidate, though a doctor, obviously has not the most elementary grasp of sociology or child development, departments from which I’m sure her human-zombifying abstractions would be laughed out of.
But good common sense couldn’t possibly discredit her position any more strongly. She obviously doesn’t understand how physiologically impossible it is in the most literal sense for underage children to understand sex enough to make a sovereign decision; if this woman has kids, I bet they’re really messed up right about now. Plus, government’s most fundamental pillar is the law code that it has. Unless arbitrary age limits that are assumed to flatly apply are written into the regional law code for issues such as these, the result will be endless judicial tyranny.