April
30th 2008
Posted under Chuck Baldwin & Constitution Party & Polls
One of the possible responses is “His platform makes sense except for retreating in face of Islamo-fascist aggression.” Wow. Now there is an unbiased option for you.
I am growing less and less tolerant each day of the pro-war interventionists. If we disentangled ourselves then we would face less aggression.
John Savage on 01 May 2008 at 3:28 pm #
Have you put this interview up yet?
RonL on 01 May 2008 at 6:39 pm #
Red,
There were plenty of options. I’m sorry that you can’t deal with an unbiased poll thqt gives multiple positions, not designed to give the result you want.
Still, 43% gave pro-Baldwin answers.
What do you think of the Constitution Party and its candidate Chuck Baldwin?
His message resonates with me in this time of challenges to U.S. sovereignty 24.41% (1145)
He won’t win, but it’s time to wean ourselves off the two-party system 18.33% (860)
His platform makes sense except for retreating in face of Islamo-fascist aggression 15.35% (720)
Regardless of his qualifications, he’ll no doubt be a spoiler and help elect a Democrat 9.87% (463)
He’s an untried, unproven Baptist preacher who can write angry columns, but what else has he done? 7.18% (337)
The other candidates are just so bad, a vote for Baldwin is not a wasted vote 6.95% (326)
Baldwin doesn’t have a chance, because politics are about money and media 6.35% (298)
I agree with the Constitution Party, but feel like I’d be throwing my vote away if I opted for Baldwin 5.41% (254)
Other 4.16% (195)
I’ll vote for the Constitution Party presidential candidate when it has a recognizable, electable name 1.98% (93)