June
24th 2008
Posted under Chuck Baldwin
Dobson and Obama are having a public spat. I guess Dobson is not an Obamacon. Dobson still maintains he will not vote for McCain. Good for him.
Dobson has not backed off his statement that he could not in good conscience vote for McCain because of concerns over the Arizona senator’s conservative credentials. Dobson has said he will vote in November but has suggested he might not vote for president.
I wish he would endorse Baldwin. It makes absolutely no sense to not vote instead of voting for Baldwin.
ERIC on 24 Jun 2008 at 3:53 am #
Exactly.
The religious right should vote for Baldwin.
Mariel on 24 Jun 2008 at 9:55 am #
Baldwin trashed Huckabee, which I think was not right, as Huckabee would have been a good candidate, even if not perfect in Baldwin’s eyes. I will vote for Baldwin, however, rather than McCain. The two front runners are neither acceptable.
roho on 24 Jun 2008 at 12:08 pm #
Very few politicians even come close to being qualified to discuss scripture…….And many of our 20th century “Showtime In The Pulpit” ministers disqualify as well! (Watching Al Sharpton and Pat Robinson make environmental commercials as a team is disgusting to say the least.)
If Dobson supports either McCain or Obama, I shall soon expect him to be sitting on the couch with Sharpton and Robertson at the beach? Chuck Baldwin’s christian doctrine in the pulpit is on about 5000 tapes over the past 20 years, and may be reviewed and critiqued by all. It’s quite sound. (Unlike Bill O’Reilly of FOX News which is hillarious when attempting to engage in theological conversation with his guests.)
Tom Millican on 24 Jun 2008 at 1:23 pm #
It is time for all good Americans to come to the aid of their country and cast their vote for Tom Millican, the only candidate that stands for a total rebirth of the greatest nation ever created by man.
A nation that was birthed by God fearing men and women who gave their very lives, honor and fortunes for that birth.
Check out what Tom Millican stands for at http://www.tommillican.com
levotb on 24 Jun 2008 at 3:29 pm #
Huckabee was a jokester and turned many real conservatives off–otherwise he would have fared much better. In fact, conservatives turned off to him even more than than they did McCain, which says something about Huckabee’s popularity on the right. What was it that turned folks (except the evangelicals) off? First, he’s an open borders/ por-amnesty Repub. Secondly, he raised taxes on items that affected the poor and lower classes. There were many other things, but what turned ME off was the way he went after the real conservatives Tancredo and Hunter in the debates. He also aligned himself with McCain to defeat Romney in FL and S.C., thereby destroying Romney’s chances and giving the nomination to another unacceptable idiot. Mostly, it was his mouth. He shot himself in the foot by saying some pretty outlandish things over the course of the campaign. He told jokes. He just wasn’t an attractive candidate, but the MNM loved him because he wasn’t a real conservative.
Dobson should endorse Baldwin. We’ll see that he does. The MNM won’t mention Baldwin’s name at all. Instead, they mention traitor Bob Barr. They totally ignore The CP.
RedPhillips on 24 Jun 2008 at 4:08 pm #
The War and foreign policy may keep Dobson from endorsing Baldwin. Sadly, Dobson is pro-war.
Mariel on 03 Jul 2008 at 9:38 am #
Yes, Tancredo and Hunter were excellent. Too bad. Sorry.
I heard Hunter speak for an hour on Glen Beck and agreed with everything he said. A heavyweight.
Huckabee did appeal to many of us who really liked him. I don’t have a much respect for him now because of toadying to McCain. He and McCain really are so far apart that it would be impossible for him to be McC’s running mate, as so many Huck supporters would like. McCain would be lucky to get him though, as he does appeal to the religious right, and won states where there were lots of them.
Wish it were not such an incredible mess.