Posted under Election 2008 & Political Philosophy
I think we can all sum up what Election 2008 comes down to, the globalized socialism of Obama vs. the national socialism of McCain. Before the McCaniacs fool you into thinking you’re saving the free market by voting for them, here are a few articles to show you there’s not a dime’s worth of difference on the big issues between both candidates.
“Elected Affliction” by Nebjosa Malic at Antiwar.com
“Socialist or National Socialist” by Tom DiLorenzo at Lew Rockwell.com
and “Is Obama a Socialist?” by Anthony Gregory, also at Lew Rockwell.com
I’d prefer an honest socialist over a phony who goes around and attacks the honest man while hiding his own socialism and hypocracy. Hopefully the good news will be on election night is that the deviant and devious one is thrown down and that honest one will survive so the case against socialism will be on its merits with a true freedom candidate making the argument.
roho on 31 Oct 2008 at 7:47 pm #
Regarding the 2 Primary Parties that control America, you can either vote for:
(A) A betrayer of conservatism, simply because your addiction to the GOP is much like the “groupie” that still thinks “Britney Spears” is still a “Mousekateer”?
(B) A marxist claiming he is the “Champion” for the “Middleclass” and has yet to define what he thinks the middleclass actually is?
The “Primaries” are over, once again proving that Americans are not yet qualified to vote, so the MSM needs to control their thinking.
Lord Peter on 01 Nov 2008 at 7:18 pm #
I think you are on to something here. Obama wants a progressive national socialism, whereas McCain domestically wants a jingoistic national socialiam (fascism) and internationally he is favor of the Trostkyite “New World Order,” like the Clinton and the Bushes before him.
Apparently, the only candidates that profess in any traditional American political values are, in alphabetical order, Ron Paul (Republican), Bob Barr (Libertarian), and Chuck Baldwin (Constitutional).