Posted under Election 2012 & Free Trade & Globalism & Immigration & Interventionism & NeoCons & Political Correctness & Race
Piyush Jindal
Neocon Piyush Jindal (AKA, “Bobby” Jindal) – and I use the word ‘neoconservative’ because it is his neoconservative friends who are grooming him to be frontrunner for the presidential nomination in 2012 – has gained much attention as of late, especially since the GOP has taken up the strategy that it no longer wants to put forward European Americans to run for president. Is the GOP now vetting possible candidates through the lens of affirmative action?
Although much could be said of Jindal’s other globalist positions (such as “humanitarian” interventionism, etc.), I’d like to focus on immigration because of misconceptions. It’s true; he has been moderately tough on immigration from Mexico. On the other hand, he supports massive increases in immigration from India — so much so that someone recently joked that we should call him Bobby “Camp of the Saints” Jindal.
Look at these two votes from his Congressional days:
2005: Rep. Jindal voted against the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 2862, the Science, State, Justice, Commerce (SSJC), and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2006. The Tancredo Amendment would have prohibited the use of SSJC funds to include in any bilateral or multilateral trade agreement any provisions that would increase immigration. This effectively would have prevented the U.S. Trade Representative from including immigration increases in Free Trade Agreements (as occured with the Sinagpore and Chile Free Trade Agreements, for instance). The Tancredo Amendment failed by a vote of 106 to 322.
2006: Co-sponsored H.R. 793, exempting from the annual cap aliens granted an H-2B visa within three years prior to approval of an H-2B petition, thus potentially TRIPLING the number of H-2B workers in the United States at any one time.
Is Jindal, as Eliot once said, a “partisan of the West”? Hardly. Is this the “conservative” I want representing me? No thanks.
Weaver on 12 Dec 2008 at 10:41 pm #
The US needs jobs and capital, not more workers, not to mention the social damage immigration does.
How do American voters fall for such politicians?
—
Bobby “Camp of the Saints” Jindal is brilliant!
Andrew T. on 13 Dec 2008 at 6:26 am #
“How do American voters fall for such politicians?”
It would be politically incorrect not to.
roho on 13 Dec 2008 at 1:08 pm #
“Camp of the Saints Jindal”……………I love it.
Immigration for me is a non-negotiable issue, and one of the reasons that McAmnesty could never have my vote.
I like your focus Bede. NOTHING compares to the candidates “Historical Voting Record”…….All else is simply salesmanship and flip-flopping.
Rodolfo Brennero on 13 Dec 2008 at 4:24 pm #
Bobby Jindal is absolutely NOT a TRUE American and you know why. This means he will NEVER be able to think and act honestly (not even 10%) for the interests of TRUE Americans. His first allegiance is for India or Pakistan (pronounced Phuckistan), and then for other darkies like him. So, MANY MORE incompatible immigrants to come.
The 10 generations TRUE European-descent Americans (soon a minority) MUST go back to the drawing board to review who they are, were they come from, and why they became and still are (not for long) the greatest nation in the world and in history of the world. Then decide where to proceed in the future right after they get rid of all parasites, even those ENEMIES that they look like themselves (or very close).
If you don’t, your children shall inherit a garbage hell. Do you TRUE Americans really care about your children?
CIAO !
VALE BENE. CURA UT VALEAS.
Rodolfo
fellist on 15 Dec 2008 at 12:02 am #
You know, Gandhi once felt so secure about the English people’s sense of ownership of England that he could free-ride it to make a third party nationalist argument. He wasn’t even making the case for his own Indian nationalism – which I suspect ‘Bobby’ Jindal wholeheartedly supports.
In 1938, when Palestinian Arabs were being systematically disposessed by Jewish immigrants, Gandhi said:
“Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct”.
The question for American voters and anti-racists everywhere is: does Rep. Jindal agree in principle with Gandhi’s nationalism? That is, does India belong to the Indians, England to the English, and America to the American people?
If ‘Bobby’ Jindal sides with Gandhi in opposing imperialist race-replacement, he’ll side with the American people who don’t want to be invaded and dispossessed. If he goes against Gandhi’s principles, we’ll know what to call him: an ethnocidist.
Jake on 15 Dec 2008 at 10:07 pm #
This is pure nonsense. Jindal is strong on immigration and Rodolfo, who is clearly not American himself, is just afraid of the GOP coming back to win its place. The more prejudice the Republican party takes place in the worse it’ll do. The nation is changing demographically and the GOP needs to be able to adjust and bring in new voting blocs. Jindal’s the guy the party needs to bring it away from senseless moronism and to breed a new open, intellectually grounded party. Palin or the other wack jobs wont cut it for the future unfortunately.
Weaver on 16 Dec 2008 at 2:24 am #
Jake, who gains from the “Republican Party” taking power as you speak of?
There’s simply no point. Jindal won’t significantly slow the demographic transformation of the US state… What you propose is essentially that America become Brazil, and learn to like it. Those who don’t like Brazil are “senseless morons.”
Well, I like America; and folks who like Brazil… ought to move there.
RonL on 17 Dec 2008 at 2:17 am #
Fellist,
Does everything revolve around Palestinians for you?
As for Ghandi, he was a piss poor conservative. He is the reason there are so many Muslims left in India.
The man who thought the British and Nazis were equivalent deserves no acknowledgment in a civilized society.
fellist on 17 Dec 2008 at 4:23 pm #
RonL, I’m using one of Gandhi’s *good* arguments to promote the interests of all peoples, but my own especially. I use Gandhi because he, like Jindal is east Indian, but more than that because Gandhi is widely considered a figure of universal moral significance, so using one of his arguments to make the case against the dispossession of Euro-man makes things tricky for proponents of Euro-replacement immigration.
The universality of the quotation is the important thing: when Gandhi says “England belongs to the English” because ALL native peoples have the same rights, many people who habitually think of these rights as only attaching to non-White peoples are prompted to think again.
Only for you does that quotation seem to be about Palestinians only, and only you (and your kind) would use it to launch an attack on Indians who didn’t ethnically cleanse all Muslims from India. And Nazis! Palestinians rarely enter my thoughts – the quote was clearly a springboard to a defence of the American people – but we know which people alone you are concerned with, and it ain’t Americans..
Old Atlantic on 26 Dec 2008 at 3:18 pm #
Fellist, Gandhi quote is brilliant find. We need to use it over and over.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1213928&blobtype=pdf
“We investigated various cases of the island model with stochastic migration. If the population is infinite, the immigrants have a fixed gene frequency and the alleles are neutral, the gene frequency on the island converges to that of the immigrants.” Nagylaki Genetics. 1979 January; 91(1): 163–176.
Those for immigration are for genetic replacement, its a theorem.
Neocon Bobby Jindal: Conform to Political Correctness Or Else! | Conservative Heritage Times on 19 Oct 2009 at 1:59 am #
[...] Fox News tonight, I saw the Republican Governor of Louisiana, Piyush Jindal (aka “Bobby” Jindal), moaning and whining over JOP Keith Bardwell’s [...]
D B Allyn on 19 Oct 2009 at 1:21 pm #
What I want to know is how the hell Louisiana ended up with a dam Indian for Governor ? It was the influx of these type of people that helped push the demise of my country.
Then again, how did the USA end up with a black or at least mongrel President ?