January
31st 2009
Posted under Uncategorized
Don’t sing your kumbyas just yet Obamaanics and one-worlders. The power of ethno-nationalism is still great as Patrick Buchanan points out in this article on Takimag.com.
Also chiming on the subject is Russian statesman Dimitry Rogozin.
I know Russia Today is the state-run English-language network backed by the Kremlin but they’re one of the few media outlets that takes people like Ron Paul and Peter Schiff seriously, at least until now.
Weaver on 31 Jan 2009 at 12:25 am #
Patroon,
You can add PCR to that list: PCR on RT (Jan 30, 2009).
roho on 31 Jan 2009 at 2:09 am #
PCR understands that our leadership comes up a bit short these days, while Putin has about an 80%+ favorability rating with his citizens.
RT has evolved into a great source, and at the rate America is going we may someday be listening to “Radio Free Russia”?
It’s sad that “200 Years” by Solzinittzen has not been published in English for the gullable U.S. citizen?
Weaver on 31 Jan 2009 at 3:12 am #
I hope First Word gets back to that.
At the rate America is going, Putin might invite rednecks to form a buffer state with China, haha.
roho on 31 Jan 2009 at 1:06 pm #
So true Weaver. I’m checking dailey to see if firstword.com has continued their english translation?
Putin has moved the Government to embrace orthodox Christianity, and told the citizens to get pregnant and have babies.
Bede on 31 Jan 2009 at 7:31 pm #
Here are the Rogozin quotes:
“There is an enormous distance between Europe and the Third World. There is a new civilization emerging in the Third World that thinks that the white, northern hemisphere has always oppressed it and must therefore fall at its feet now. This is very serious.”
“If the northern civilization wants to protect itself, it must be united: America, the European Union, and Russia. If they are not together, they will be defeated one by one.”
http://www.russiatoday.com/guests/detail/1801
Robert Lee on 01 Feb 2009 at 5:56 am #
“Are we really in a post-racial America, or is our multicultural multiethnic America, too, destined for Balkanization and break-up?”
Amen, Brother Buchanan. I’ve been thinking lately that the most likely (and probably the most preferable) resolution to America’s racial problems is the break-up of the Union.
It would be a fitting end to the psychosis of multiculturalism, wouldn’t it?
roho on 02 Feb 2009 at 5:10 am #
Russia is part of the history of “White Christianity”!
The introduction of both Bolshevism and communism was from Jewish/Zionist influence, and the International Bankers of Zionism are the ones promoting bad relationships between “WHITE CHRISTIANS!
Without chaos, they can’t offer sollutions!
RonL on 03 Feb 2009 at 12:09 am #
Roho,
Stop embarrassing yourself. Zionism was a crime in the Soviet Union except for a short period, when the communists hoped to co-opt Israel. The practice of Judaism was as outlawed as Christianity.
Communism is an antisemetic cult. Go look up “On the Jewish Question” by Karl Marx. (Actually, you would probably agree with Marx)
roho on 03 Feb 2009 at 1:53 am #
Ron L…………..Zionist Bankers could care less about Judism, Islam, Hindu, or Christianity. They worship MONEY. And manipulate the nations.
RonL on 03 Feb 2009 at 5:41 am #
If they cared about money, they would not be Zionists.
Frankly, given their stupid lending practices, their actual Mammon is liberalism. Damn neo-Frankists.
Weaver on 04 Feb 2009 at 5:31 am #
Mr. Lee,
Secession/Balkanisation sounds good, but unfortunately it wouldn’t (won’t) be entirely amicable… So, obviously for those of us who fear it’s inevitable, taking necessary precautions and planning ahead is wise.
It’s also a shame there’s a sort of brain drain from homogeneous rural areas to diverse metros. We can see with the Irish how expensive the brain drain toll can be. I fear the long term consequences of this.
Pro-White Activist on 05 Feb 2009 at 7:27 am #
This response is applicable to this topic: from a previous thread – http://conservativetimes.org/?p=2504
ERIC: “The farthest right you can get is white nationalism”
Not true at all – I’m a pro-White activist and I hold many so called ‘leftist’ beliefs, most of them related to economic fairness, environmentalism, and the rejection of religious fundamentalism. I don’t hate all other ethnic/racial groups and I certainly don’t want to commit violence or genocide against them, but I do see other ethnic/racial groups as being in resource competition with Whites for land, resources, and influence because that is the way they view us.
That being said, I want Whites to become more politically, socially, and economically organized before they end up being swamped by non-Whites in their own countries, before they end up becoming a minority in the countries which their heroic, intelligent, and industrious White ancestors founded, settled, and built. Whites being outright replaced is obviously an increasing possibility now that non-Whites are scrambling by the hundreds of millions if not billions to immigrate to White-majority countries because they are so much safer, cleaner, less corrupt, and more prosperous than non-White countries. Why is that? Because the WHITE MAJORITY MADE THEM THAT WAY…and do take note of the fact that Whites are only about 10-15% of the overall world population and falling rather rapidly, especially in Europe.
If Whites fail to act en masse within the next few decades, all which they and their White ancestors built, invented, and achieved in the previous five centuries of glorious White achievement will be ceded to other groups that didn’t work as hard as Whites to build up their civilizations and cultures. This is already happening in parts of very crowded Asia where they have been copying and emulating White ideas and achievement for decades, all the while looking greedily upon the current expansiveness and abundance of White lands as possible future colonies for the vastly overpopulated Asian lands once White population numbers start to decline (as they now are). I also would like for Whites to help non-Whites to improve (but definitely not control) non-White countries in terms of infrastructure, health, birth control, corruption, political stability etc so that they don’t want or feel like they have to immigrate to White countries for a a better life.
S.L. Toddard: “It’s appropriately marginalized, and rarely even considered by the vast majority of Americans. When it is considered at all – an extremely rare occurrence…That’s one of the few good things we can still say about our countrymen – that they ignore White Nationalism.”
The only thing that makes White nationalists “marginal” is their brutal honesty, because apparently honesty and being totally above-board regarding the correct idea that RACE/ETHNICITY is the FOUNDATIONAL BEDROCK of human civilization is simply not acceptable in modern political discourse in many countries where Whites are the majority. White nationalists/pro-White activists openly and explicitly express and promote ideas which most Whites hold and live by implicitly, even many leftist Whites.
For example, White Americans and Europeans (of whatever political orientation) still prefer to live in safe, clean, and respectable White (or near all-White) neighborhoods; they want to send their children to schools that are all or majority White because they are generally better; they almost always have spouses/partners/friends who are solely White; they work in companies where the majority of people are White; and so on and so forth. These White Americans and Europeans live nice and prosperous all-White lives almost without realizing or being conscious of it, and they take for granted the prosperity, safety, cleanliness, stability, non-corruption and respect for law/order, and relative freedom which comes along with living in a majority White society.
All pro-White activists ask is people of White European stock in America, Canada, Europe, Australia, Argentina, etc to EXPLICITLY and OPENLY acknowledge these facts (as almost every other ethnic-racial group around the world does) and begin to realize the stark and obviously difficult civilizational and population-related perils and pressures which face them now in the present (and which will get MUCH WORSE in to the future) if they fail to (re)assert and protect their collective racial/ethnic interests for the long-term just as every other group does – and like Whites USED to do before the ascendancy of the PC-multicultural-anti-White-White guilt-”Whites are evil” movement which occurred in the second half of the 20th Century.
Weaver on 05 Feb 2009 at 12:42 pm #
RonL,
neoFrankist? That’s not a slur one hears everyday, but it’s a good one.
I actually thought at first you meant the Frankfurt school, but you meant Jacob Frank.
RonL on 10 Feb 2009 at 3:59 am #
Weaver,
Yes, I was referring to Jacob/Joseph Frank. Frank believed in turning Judaism on its head to bring about the Messianic era.
It applies equally to communists and to rich Jews who piss on Judaism for liberalism.
The last time I used the term was telling off a Reconstructionist “Rabbi” defending officiating homosexual “marriages”. I also referenced Isaiah 5:20-25. He really lost it.