Posted under Culture & Obama & Race
Yesterday as I was leaving Wal-Mart I spotted a Black man wearing a t-shirt that said “My President is Black” surrounding a picture of Obama. While I think it is generally unhelpful for White people to play the morally superior color blind card, in this case it is instructive. Can you imagine the outrage if the election had gone differently and a White person wore a shirt with McCain and the words “My President is White?”
I don’t care if Black people are proud that the new President is black. Why shouldn’t they be? It is the hypocrisy and double standard that galls. Either what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander or it is sauce for neither. This is the insidious way anti-racist Cultural Marxism works. What for others is taken for granted (racial and ethnic pride) is villified as the worst possible sin for Whites.
P.S. This is not an invitation for a Captainchaos rant.
Editor’s Note: Comments closed.
47 Responses to “Seen at Wal-Mart …”
HarrisonBergeron on 19 Mar 2009 at 1:29 pm #
Well, you hit the nail on the head — what we’re seeing is a glaring double standard about “racism.”
Another way of looking at it is to realize that the working definition of racism means only one race can be guilty of it. Hence the odious term “reverse discrimination” when whites suffer from affirmative action, which is nothing but legal racism.
roho on 19 Mar 2009 at 2:09 pm #
I think that “Morris Dees” and the SPLC has them backordered for $6.95 and working on a “Federal Rebate Program” for the consumer? {sic}
Jack Hunter on 19 Mar 2009 at 2:59 pm #
Did the T-shirt look anything like this? I’ve seen the same shirt and thought the same thing. Here’s the rap song that inspired it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXtRrTNPFtg
Filmer on 19 Mar 2009 at 5:02 pm #
Jack, I don’t think the shirt had a flag. I think it had Obama’s face over the presidential seal.
Captainchaos on 19 Mar 2009 at 9:16 pm #
David Duke for president.
Ernest on 19 Mar 2009 at 9:24 pm #
I often wonder for all the white “anti-racist”(is that redundant?) where do they think this will all end or lead to? Do they think at some point in the future that the NAACP, LaRaza et al are going to willingly give up power and make a public announcement that it is “all good” now. Do they, or anybody else for that matter honestly believe these groups, of which there are many, see skin color as just a “social construct” and they are just waiting for whitey to get with the program so they can disband?
Nathan P. Origer on 20 Mar 2009 at 5:58 am #
It’s okay to be a real conservative and to shop at Wal*Mart?
News to me.
Weaver on 20 Mar 2009 at 4:49 pm #
Mr. Origer,
surely it’s fine to shop there occasionally if it’s too much trouble to go elsewhere.
Not that I shop there frequently. The last time: it was 2 AM, and I was in desperate need of a toilet plunger.
Andrew T. on 22 Mar 2009 at 2:42 pm #
Captainchaos, you’re not welcome here. I assure you the ravings of finger-pointing, button-pressing white nationalists have nothing to do with the interests of genuine conservatives, who want to preserve and strengthen the multi-racial nation of PEOPLE we have today instead of magnify and exacerbate immoral, Darwinian boundaries of race and class (much less continue to blame everything that doesn’t suit you on the most maligned and pogromed people in the history of the world, the Jews). Much of the reason I don’t come to this website that often anymore is because you and your ilk continue to ruin any possibility of good discussion.
I’m sort of undecided what to think about shopping at Wal-Mart, as I’ve heard so much on both sides of the argument. I still claim ignorance as far as what’s behind it all. Though, in times of recession, lower prices are one of the few silver linings.
Captainchaos on 22 Mar 2009 at 4:24 pm #
Andrew T.: “Captainchaos, you’re not welcome here.”
Aw shucks.
“I assure you the ravings of finger-pointing, button-pressing white nationalists…”
LOL! I offered up a four word sentence of my support for the candidacy for president of a fine Southern, Christian gentleman, Mr. Duke, in this thread. Get a grip.
“have nothing to do with the interests of genuine conservatives,”
I take it you mean con-servatives: those that fool themselves and others that they are truly preserving what is of value. You know, as in deception and self-deception, sound familiar?
“…who want to preserve and strengthen the multi-racial nation…”
Bring on miscegenation, bring on anti-racist, er, anti-White brainwashing, bring on forced integration. This pan-White phenomenon of White flight could be a genuine problem long term; better nip it in the bud.
“…of PEOPLE…”
White PEOPLE are not PEOPLE?
“…we have today instead of magnify and exacerbate immoral, Darwinian boundaries of race and class…”
LOL! *Paging Dr. Horkheimer. Paging Dr. Adorno.*
“…(much less continue to blame everything that doesn’t suit you on the most maligned and pogromed people in the history of the world, the Jews).”
Erm, ask Ukrainians who Lazar Kaganovitch is. Ask Leon Trotsky, I mean Lev Bronstein, about his concept of the “blocking guard,” if you happen to get in touch with him.
“Much of the reason I don’t come to this website that often anymore is because you and your ilk continue to ruin any possibility of good discussion.”
Haven’t you noticed the shift towards sociobiology at Tacky Mag lately? You see, they will tolerate a wog like Razib Khan, who advocates the flooding of America with his co-ethnics in the continuing program to dispossess White men from positions of influence in the civilization we built, talk about the genetics of Europeans, but never a White man, in his own voice. Hmm, I smell a rat.
“I’m sort of undecided what to think about shopping at Wal-Mart, as I’ve heard so much on both sides of the argument.”
Only twits and lemmings get hung up on incidentals (“Gee, should I or should I not shop at Wal-Mart?” LOL!) whilst ignoring the systemic, anti-White genocidalist thrust of the ENTIRE system.
“Though, in times of recession, lower prices are one of the few silver linings.”
For a pro-White revolutionary there is no shame in gaining sustenance and strength where and how he must from a decaying, anti-White system always with keeping in mind his fundamental hostility to said system, and how he must contribute to abolishing it and erecting a new, life-giving, pro-White system. For you, I guess whatever floats your boat will do.
Captainchaos on 22 Mar 2009 at 4:50 pm #
Ernest: “Do they, or anybody else for that matter honestly believe these groups, of which there are many, see skin color as just a “social construct” and they are just waiting for whitey to get with the program so they can disband?”
Non-White advocacy groups, most of all Jews, are acting to further their own ethnic genetic interests at the expense of the EGI of White people. There will be no end to it, even when the White race itself is disbanded (genetically annihilated). Life is Darwinian, genetically distinct groups compete for finite resources, it is ultimately a zero-sum game. Whites are being played for fools.
Nathan P. Origer: “It’s okay to be a real conservative and to shop at Wal*Mart?
News to me.”
Just where do YOU suppose average White folk are supposed to get the necessities at an affordable price when ensconced in an anti-White genocidalist system that is hellbent on phasing them out of existence, eh genius? Your harebrained brand of “activism” is for lemmings who refuse to acknowledge the untenable anti-White thrust of the ENTIRE system. Get a clue.
Weaver on 22 Mar 2009 at 5:38 pm #
CaptainChaos,
by buying at less anti-American stores and by buying at smaller stores, you’re helping to free Americans from that system.
It’s interesting that the type of work someone does often strongly influences his views.
Weaver on 22 Mar 2009 at 5:44 pm #
In principle it’s fine to save money by shopping at Wal-Mart if investing the savings towards worthy goals, such as a separate school for one’s children or something to advance one’s career which would then be used towards schools and other things including just ensuring one’s children turn out well.
It takes a heroic effort to defend children from being devoured by the beast in this day.
Andrew T. on 23 Mar 2009 at 1:09 am #
“It’s interesting that the type of work someone does often strongly influences his views.”
My current job is at an awful discount store called Roses’. Our customers are mostly hoods, rednecks, and trailer park dwellers. Wal-Mart looks good in comparison. Amazingly, the sociological insights into the nature of human frivolity and materialism that I have acquired over my nine months have not yet transformed me into a misanthropic nihilist. Perhaps it’s my faith in God… Captainchaos should try it; who knows, it might force him to reconsider his loathing for non-caucasian homo sapiens.
Andrew T. on 23 Mar 2009 at 1:15 am #
“LOL! I offered up a four word sentence of my support for the candidacy for president of a fine Southern, Christian gentleman, Mr. Duke, in this thread. Get a grip.”
To call David Duke a “fine Southern, Christian gentleman” is to exclude as much information as to call Adolf Hitler a “nice painter”, or Charles Manson a “unique, novel kind of guy”.
“Only twits and lemmings get hung up on incidentals (”Gee, should I or should I not shop at Wal-Mart?” LOL!) whilst ignoring the systemic, anti-White genocidalist thrust of the ENTIRE system.”
I’m a twit and a lemming for doing my best to consider multiple sides of an issue instead of rushing in to make up my mind? Thanks…
Get a girlfriend. And get over yourself. Loser.
Andrew T. on 23 Mar 2009 at 1:35 am #
And where do you get off insulting Ernest, anyway? My individualist, free market ideas would put me on a different wave length than Ernest who is probably more of a populist/protectionist like Weaver, but I would not insult someone just for disagreeing. Heck, most of my friends and peers are left-liberals and socialists, but I love them just the same. Sure, they are PC, but their unexamined biases are not their ideologies. “Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do”. We all err somehow, but we are all equal in the eyes of God, for He has created us not to be robotic slaves to Darwinian nature, but to confront it and transcend it. You call him hare-brained? What is hare-brained if not an entire view of the world based in the advancement of one race of a species to exclude all others?
Somehow, captainchaos, I have a hard time imagining you are even a remotely happy person, seeing as you you devote yourself to a narrow-minded neo-Darwinian ideology based first in animosity, unbending hatred of others, and scientism. Your arrogance is a thing truly unmatched, sir.
Andrew T. on 23 Mar 2009 at 1:35 am #
And where do you get off insulting Ernest, anyway? My individualist, free market ideas would put me on a different wave length than Ernest who is probably more of a populist/protectionist like Weaver, but I would not insult someone just for disagreeing. Heck, most of my friends and peers are left-liberals and sociailists, but I love them just the same. Sure, they are PC, but their unexamined biases are not their ideologies. “Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do”. We all err somehow, but we are all equal in the eyes of God, for He has created us not to be robotic slaves to Darwinian nature, but to confront it and transcend it. You call him hare-brained? What is hare-brained if not an entire view of the world based in the advancement of one race of a species to exclude all others?
Somehow, captainchaos, I have a hard time imagining you are even a remotely happy person, seeing as you you devote yourself to a narrow-minded neo-Darwinian ideology based first in animosity, unbending hatred of others, and scientism. Your arrogance is a thing truly unmatched, sir.
Weaver on 23 Mar 2009 at 4:02 am #
Andrew,
heh there’s little risk you’ll turn socialist after working at a discount store. I’m confident you’ll remain libertarian leaning the rest of your life, but most people I think turn more socialist after working at a place like that because they’re part of the system. It’s hard to be a libertarian or conservative when not more independent and when not part of a community.
Since you’re educated and intelligent I doubt you’ll make a career out of that either, which is a big difference.
Ugh, it’s still blocking the word “socialist”…
Andrew T. on 23 Mar 2009 at 5:41 pm #
Weaver, if there’s anything I’ve learned after the experience, it’s that Joe Sixpack is indeed a leftist (for the past few months, we’ve sold lots of Obama merch and a LITTLE bit of McCain merch right next to the entrance doors); he’s just annoyed by the bossy sound of Barbara Streisand’s voice.
Captainchaos on 23 Mar 2009 at 9:12 pm #
“To call David Duke a “fine Southern, Christian gentleman” is to exclude as much information as to call Adolf Hitler a “nice painter”, or Charles Manson a “unique, novel kind of guy”.”
I’m afraid you don’t know what you are talking about.
“I’m a twit and a lemming for doing my best to consider multiple sides of an issue instead of rushing in to make up my mind? Thanks…”
Yes, you haven’t investigated the matter as I have. Why? Because you are contented with your brainwashing. But there will come a time when the egalitarian lies you have imbibed will not protect you; no more so than an umbrella will safeguard you against a falling anvil.
“Get a girlfriend. And get over yourself. Loser.”
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
“And where do you get off insulting Ernest, anyway?”
Funny, I don’t recall insulting Ernest; learn how to read more carefully. What I did was answer Ernest’s question.
“Sure, they are PC, but their unexamined biases are not their ideologies.”
Let us pause and soak up the irony.
“You call him hare-brained?”
The OTHER GUY I was addressing who was NOT ERNEST has a very myopic world view.
“What is hare-brained if not an entire view of the world based in the advancement of one race of a species to exclude all others?”
All other groups act in their interests and prefer the company of their own, so do Whites, but they have been brainwashed into believing that paying hypocritical lip service to the inverse of what THEY ACTUALLY DO (e.g., White-flight) is the sine qua non of morality. It did not used to be that way (regarding racialism), what is now is not an improvement.
Captainchaos on 23 Mar 2009 at 11:34 pm #
We’ll see if this makes it beyond “moderation”.
Re Hitler:
Adolf Hitler, and his National Socialist movement, saved the German people, i.e., the German nation, from starvation, humiliation and despair. Adolf Hitler’s armies saved Western Europe from being transformed into a giant Katyn mass grave. Adolf Hitler, a man of implacable courage, will and devotion to his people stated that he demanded no sacrifices from his soldiers that he himself had not made fighting on the Western Front.
There was no “Holocaust”, no planned, concerted effort to exterminate Jews or any other peoples. It is a lie.
Re David Duke:
David Duke was born in Louisiana, is a professing Christian, has a Ph.D. and CONSISTENTLY says that ALL peoples have the right to preserve their heritage, which includes their genetic heritage, and none less those of European descent.
You would do well to hold your tongue for a second and think before you criticize your betters.
Weaver on 24 Mar 2009 at 5:48 am #
McCain was never popular.
Palin and Paul merch would have sold well too. Paul is exceedingly popular, far outside proportion of his numbers.
Andrew T. on 24 Mar 2009 at 7:14 pm #
Weaver,
It actually was mostly Palin merch, now that I think about it. The McCain shirts sold like lead and took a long time to sell out even after $1 clearance (!).
Though I doubt Ron Paul merch would have sold well…in these parts, it’s a rare person that even recognizes the name and face.
Captainchaos on 24 Mar 2009 at 9:53 pm #
You are right to exclude my comments, Filmer. As is evident, the intellectual tone is raised considerably by my non-participation.
“Dem dar Sarrrah Paaylin merc sold plenty good!”
LOL!
Filmer on 25 Mar 2009 at 1:11 am #
Captain, I haven’t excluded anything. Your comments were in moderation. Dostoevsky is the one who said he was going to delete your comments from his threads. What I said above is that this thread was not an invitation for one of your rants.
You need to stick to the conversation at hand and stop intruding with your single-minded obsession in non-germane threads.
I think you irritate people on purpose just so they will boot you off and then you can add another notch to your martyr belt.
Andrew T. on 25 Mar 2009 at 4:49 am #
Just for laughs, it would be nice to see a white nationalist actually ACKNOWLEDGE the historically documented and OVERWHELMING indisputable evidence that the German Holocaust was a real historical occurrence, and still have no qualms about the morality of the subject.
You probably have no genuine morals, anyway, and I reckon no person likes you anyway (here, or in real life), and your movement will certainly continue to be a complete and utter failure (systematic inevitability, my fat rear end). You might as well be consistent in your moral depravity and REVEL in the historical fact that millions of Jews (and about as many non-Jews, who did not conform to the brutal standards of the Nazi regime in some way) were kidnapped into the squalor of military concentration camps and worked/starved to death or exterminated. They weren’t enlightened whites, after all. Their lives were meaningless, were they not?
It’s all lies! Globalist Jew and browny LIIIEEESS! Cough cough…excuse me. Lost myself there for a moment.
“I think you irritate people on purpose just so they will boot you off and then you can add another notch to your martyr belt.”
I could not have said it better myself, Filmer. An ideological bigot and intellectual bloodsucker is always terrible enough, but one with an odd sense of patience and endurance with a victim complex to boot is just the worst.
This man seems to believe so strongly in the glory of his own unerring omnipotence, he thinks of anyone who diverts even slightly from his EXACT position on even a single issue (like Wal-Mart, for instance) as “brainwashed”. Few things could be more insulting to myself, personally, than to be referred to as brainwashed, when I have taken pride in the fact that I try to approach everything with a great deal of restraint, introspection, and a devotion to never letting the opinions of peers have undue influence on my own thinking.
Eman on 25 Mar 2009 at 10:54 am #
You ‘conservatives’ think you know a lot about “free enterprise capitalism” and “economics” – read the brilliant Ezra Pound sometime and learn a thing or two about economics and how it has been hijacked by a rootless and transnational Jewish elite: http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/7897401/pound_ezra/radioPound.html
Captainchaos on 25 Mar 2009 at 5:26 pm #
Andrew T.: “…it would be nice to see a white nationalist actually ACKNOWLEDGE the historically documented and OVERWHELMING indisputable evidence that the German Holocaust was a real historical occurrence,”
I will certainly not “acknowledge” the ‘truth’ of that which I know to be a lie.
“Few things could be more insulting to myself, personally, than to be referred to as brainwashed,”
“…I have taken pride in…restraint, introspection,”
Okay Andrew, I’ll take you at your word. Now, as a man of your word, consider the following:
Dr. Robert Faurisson writes in The Journal for Historical Review (Winter 1986 Volume 7 page 389):
“Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of the Auschwitz concentration camp. He is often called “the Commandant of Auschwitz,” and the general public knows of him from a book published under the title Commandant in Auschwitz.
He appeared before the International Military Tribunal as a witness on 15 April 1946, where his deposition caused a sensation. To the amazement of the defendants and in the presence of journalists from around the world, he confessed to the most frightful crimes that history had ever known. He said that he had personally received an order from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz 3,000,000 people had been exterminated, 2,500,000 of them by means of gas chambers. His confessions were false. They had been extorted from Höss by torture, but it took until 1983 to learn the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures they inflicted upon him.
The confessions of Rudolf Höss supply the keystone to the theory which maintains that systematic extermination of the Jews, especially by means of homicidal gas chambers, was a historical reality.”
………………..
“We have known for some time that the Auschwitz myth is of an exclusively Jewish origin. Arthur R. Butz has related the facts in his book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, as has Wilhelm Stäglich in The Auschwitz Myth. The principal authors of the creation and the peddling of the “rumor of Auschwitz” have been, successively, two Slovaks, Alfred Wetzler (or Weczler) and Rudolf Vrba (or Rosenberg or Rosenthal); then a Hungarian, Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weissmandel (or Weissmandl); then, in Switzerland, representatives of the World Jewish Congress like Gerhard Riegner, who were in touch with London and Washington; and finally Americans like Harry Dexter White, Henry Morgenthau Jr. and Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise. Thus was born the famous World Refugee Board Report on Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in Washington in November 1944. Copies of this report were included in the files of the judges advocate general in charge of prosecuting the Germans involved in the Auschwitz camp. It constituted the official version of the story of the alleged gassing of the Jews in that camp. Most probably it was used as a reference work by the inquirers-interrogators-torturers of “the Commandant of Auschwitz.” All the names here mentioned are those of Jews.”
………………….
“Moreover we now see that Bernard Clarke, the first British torturer, was a Jew.”
………………….
“Establishment historians dispute that Höss had been tortured and had confessed under duress. Since the publication of Rupert Butler’s book in 1983, however, it is no longer possible for them to contest that. The Revisionists were right.”
…………………
“The author [Rupert Butler] quotes several fragments of what are either written or recorded statements by Clarke [wherein Clarke admits to torturing Hoss].”
…………………
“Once the tortured prisoner had begun to talk, according to Clarke, it was impossible to stop him. Clarke, no more conscious in 1982 or 1983 than in 1946 of the enormity of what he forced Höss to confess, goes on to describe a series of fictitious horrors presented here as the truth: Höss went on to tell how after the bodies had been ignited, the fat oozing from them was poured over the other bodies (!). He estimated the number of dead during just the period when he was at Auschwitz at two million (!); the killings reached 10,000 victims per day (!).”
…………………
“In January-March 1985, the trial of Ernst Zündel, who was accused by a Jewish association and by the Crown of spreading Revisionist literature, took place in Toronto (Canada). Rudolf Vrba testified as a Crown witness. (He lives now in British Columbia). Affirmative and self assured as long as he answered the questions of the Crown, he suffered a spectacular rout when cross-examined by Ernst Zündel’s lawyer, Doug Christie. For the first time since 1945 a Jewish witness to the alleged gassings in Auschwitz was asked to explain his affirmations and his figures. The result was so terrible for R. Vrba that finally the Crown itself gave a kind of coup de grace to its key witness. That unexpected event and some others (like the leading specialist of the Holocaust, Raul Hilberg, being caught red-handed in his lies) really made of the “Toronto Trial” the “Trial of the Nuremberg Trial.”
The unintentional revelations of Rupert Butler in 1983 and unexpected revelations of the “Toronto Trial” in 1985 succeeded at last in showing entirely and clearly how the Auschwitz myth was fabricated from 1944 to 1947, to be exact from April 1944, when Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler are supposed to have escaped from Auschwitz to tell their story to the world up until April 1947, when Rudolf Höss was hanged after having supposedly told the same world his own story about Auschwitz.
It is remarkable that from beginning to end that story comes from essentially or perhaps even exclusively Jewish sources. Two Jewish liars (Vrba and Wetzler) from Slovakia convinced or seemed to have convinced other Jews from Hungary, Switzerland, United States, Great Britain, and Poland. This is not a conspiracy or a plot; it is the story of the birth of a religious belief: the myth of Auschwitz, center of the religion of the Holocaust.”
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html
_________________________________________________
Recall, Hoss confessed to the extermination of THREE MILLION persons at Auschwitz.
What is the official tally recorded on a plaque at Auschwitz today?
“For many years, a memorial plaque placed at the camp by the Soviet authorities stated that 4 million people had been murdered at Auschwitz. The government of the People’s Republic of Poland also supported this figure. In the west, this figure was accepted, but some historians had their doubts.[1] After the collapse of the Communist government in 1989, the plaque was removed and the official death toll given as 1.1 million.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auschwitz_concentration_camp#Death_toll
What’s that now? 1.1 million? Gee, what gives? That’s ‘Holocaust math’ for you, cough cough.
Captainchaos on 25 Mar 2009 at 9:55 pm #
Did my “Holocaust” comment get spammed? Geez!
Captainchaos on 25 Mar 2009 at 9:59 pm #
Andrew, you want to keep an open mind and learn about the other side of the story I suggest you read this short article:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html
Andrew T. on 26 Mar 2009 at 12:29 am #
You are someone of intransigent bias, and you know it.
When I have time, I will examine your sources, though.
Captainchaos on 26 Mar 2009 at 1:49 am #
“You are someone of intransigent bias, and you know it.”
Bullshit. I have not one bit of trouble looking myself in the mirror knowing that it is honorable to value and preserve my race; and to identify those who are truly motivated by ‘hate’ who seek to destroy our race. I did not come to these stark conclusions overnight, it was not easy for me.
Ask Guru Weaver what he thinks, what he honestly thinks, of the matter – ‘off the record’.
I can also provide a column written by Pat Buchanan in 1990, I believe, that states his profound skepticism of the Holocaust narrative.
I am honor bound to persist. Someone must at least try to hold up a candle to damn the darkness.
Why I bother with paleos, yes, with tenacity, is because they are the fence-sitters we need on our side. You probably read Vdare, do you respect Brimelow? If Brimelow is truly worthy of your respect, perhaps, just perhaps, he appreciates something you have hitherto shut your ears to regarding MacDonald.
P.S. Strident rhetoric and brinksmanship is sometimes necessary to appear on the radar. If Guru Weaver honestly thought I was some kind of sociopathic ‘Nazi’ do you believe he would tolerate my presence for a second. Think on it, hard. Much is at stake.
Andrew T. on 26 Mar 2009 at 4:15 am #
Captainchaos, this forum has gone by a non-ban policy, if for no other reason than to prevent fringies from claiming that we have something set against them. I assure you, we tolerate rather than embrace your presence. For Taki’s magazine and Chronicles, it was no longer manageable.
I don’t regularly read V-Dare. I am for enforcement of existing immigration laws, and have a strong stance on the issue, but my interest in the subject is not particular enough to merit reading the website on a regular basis. Political website that I read daily include First Principles Journal, LewRockwell.com, and this website.
Captainchaos on 26 Mar 2009 at 6:58 pm #
Ruffling the feathers of the benighted and self-righteous is the price of doing business. Biological race is objectively verifiable reality. The characteristics of a given race can be objectively verified. Self-evidently, if the genetic continuity of a given race is not secured, its characteristics, and what is of value to us grounded in that, will be lost.
The Holocaust narrative is used by Jews to shame into submission all peoples of European descent for the self-perceived interests of Jewry. So obviously, blunting that weapon used against us is of immense importance. In a sense it is not a moral question, it is a matter to be investigated empirically. Much of this investigation has already been done, the Holocaust narrative simply does not hold water; so the fruits of these investigations are suppressed and the investigators and truth tellers jailed and fined.
For instance, Rudolf Hoss, as described in the article I linked, who was one of several Auschwitz commandants, who would be expected to know what went on, on his turf, which was his job, was demonstrably tortured into “admitting” physically impossible absurdities, technically impossible absurdities, that now form the cornerstone of the Holocaust narrative. He was bullied into asserting that three million people were exterminated at Auschwitz. The plaque today at Auschwitz lists the total number of victims at 1.1 million. Official Red Cross figures, whose organization was allowed access to the camps, lists the total number of Jews who died in German concentration camps as between 200,000-300,000. I did not make these thinks up, I am simply relating them.
It is not my fault that you are blind to your racial interests, to your genetic interests, it is my fault however if I allow that state to persist in our people unchallenged. As for Chronicles and Takimag, they are complicit in suppressing the truth that is vital to the interests of our people. The men there, many of them, put their own petty self-interests before the good of our race, when they could damn well give the whole truth and nothing but, with Taki’s deep pockets providing grist for the mill – that is not the behavior of honorable men, and therefore does not merit my respect.
Captainchaos on 26 Mar 2009 at 7:47 pm #
Oh, and Andrew, it is patently obvious that you believe a decent man would not think on things like this, much less spend his energy researching the matter. Such things are unconscionable, and no one of conscience would would give them a second thought, it is that right? Ridiculous.
I will not disguise my contempt for the abject pabulum that is consistently served up here, and at Tacky Mag, which suckers in men who seem to be neurologically incapable of daring to think outside the box unless forced, and in the process aids the forces of anti-White genocide whilst keeping the already myopic in the dark. If the stakes are what I say they are, and they most certainly are, what self-possessed man of free intellect would not bristle with outrage at such a state of affairs?
It is not White Nationalism that needs to accommodate faileoconservatism. Faileoconservatism is worse than no opposition at all, because it is a false opposition. It is certainly no coincidence that you are a faileocon fellow-traveler and your chest swells with pride as you jettison your ignorant nonsense.
You are a casualty, you have been had.
Filmer on 26 Mar 2009 at 8:38 pm #
Andrew, don’t feed the beast. It just encourages him.
Giles Venier on 26 Mar 2009 at 9:27 pm #
You are ALL wrong. The real struggle for power is between neither liberals and conservatives nor blacks and whites, but between males and females.
Our real challenge lies in our genetic interests rather than in preserving some faileoconservative ideology — true.
But our real genetic interest lies not in race, but rather in the supremacy of the Y chromosome. Only the utter neutering of you all prevents all of you from seeing that. For most of the history of the human race, men were on top. Now? We’ve all become a bunch of lap-dogs, scurrying to do the bidding of the “weaker sex” (ha!) and allowing them to destroy the patriarchy.
Go ahead, nurse your little ideologies while S.C.U.M.
http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm
goes to work weeding us out of existence. It didn’t die with Solanas, boys.
Captainchaos on 27 Mar 2009 at 12:18 am #
Giles Venier,
I don’t deny the importance of reaffirming traditional sex roles, particularly because high IQ women having largely abandoned child-birth and nurturing IS having a dysgenic impact on our racial stock by lowering the number of intelligent children born. Wasn’t it Weaver who said he is in favor of maintaining racial quality (i.e., combating dysgenics)? Why yes it was.
Otherwise, you are missing the forest for the trees, as is all too typical of faileocons.
Filmer,
Aaargh, what is so eminently frustrating is that you cannot lay a glove on one of the assertions of fact I have made. So you don’t even try. What is it? You believe that any explicit assertion of our European peoplehood will lead to WWII like excesses? Isn’t that really it? Just precisely how the fuck do you suppose Sam Francis’ plan for White people to reassert cultural dominance over America would have been achieved sans explicit White racial consciousness, eh? Oh, and what else? It was okay for the White man to be racially conscious back when he had traditional, monarchical authorities that served to check his tribalism from becoming too inflamed? Gee, that worked out well, didn’t it? And what, if we can’t reassert the old cultural forms, as an alleged check on Whitey’s tribalism being inflamed, we had just best let our race wither on the vine as painlessly as possible? LOL! What rank imbecility and sheer nihilism!
And thing to say for yourself Filmer?
Captainchaos on 27 Mar 2009 at 12:21 am #
The final sentence of my preceding comment should read: “Anything to say for yourself Filmer?”
Which begs the question.
Weaver on 27 Mar 2009 at 12:35 am #
Giles Venier,
is that some kind of joke? Surely you spam…
Captainchaos on 27 Mar 2009 at 1:32 am #
Weaver, apparently you are viewed by faileocon lemmings as a leader of sorts, did the thought ever occur to you to be a leader in fact? Or is it better to sit back and pull most of your punches past the point where you are able to land any? Get this, Takimag is a sick joke (yes, I’m afraid it’s all too true). We’ve got the judaized tag team of Gottfried and Spencer, peddling their “Nietzschean nonsense.” We’ve got the advent of the “Alternative Right,” which is nothing more than the same old shit in a new box, plus Nietzsche. We’ve the greasy Asian partisan Razib Khan to tell us of the coming virtues of an Asian technocratic elite, we’ll need it, because Whitey just doesn’t have the brains, much less the inclination, to get the job done anymore. We’ve got Buchanan, seventy years old, who realistically doesn’t have much gas left in his tank, who will come to the threshold of telling the whole truth but never cross it. What a fucking joke, LOL!
Ever wonder if you could do better? (Important note: This blog in its present form is not “doing better”.)
Weaver on 27 Mar 2009 at 2:29 am #
Captain,
there’s a limit to what’s possible, and everyone here isn’t going to be in agreement.
“Guru Weaver”? I’m just allowed to post here. If Andrew wanted to post something, I’d be happy to publish it.
If you’re going to remind everyone of my abstract views on eugenics (for the preservation of Creation against genetic mutations which accumulate within civilised societies where the environment is less harsh) and amalgamation (people should have roots and a place of belonging), then you’ll only succeed in getting me to resign from here. I’ll not have the reputation of folks here tarnished by association with some view of little me, so if it appears such is happening then I’ll simply resign.
Weaver on 27 Mar 2009 at 2:34 am #
It should be noted that I’m a Southerner with deep roots, and I’m not a white nationalist dreaming of violently taking over the federal government…
Captain an online acquaintance of mine recently declared “war” on what he termed “Aryan Futurism”. The point being: there are substantial differences. You’re not a futurist or Promethian or whatever, but you’re not a Christian either, so I find similarity in your singular obsession with genetics without consideration of anything else. While genetics is important, it is not everything.
You shouldn’t assume we agree on everything simply because we agree in some areas. And by “online acquaintance” I simply mean that I’ve responded at his blog a few times, but I also share some of his views, though not everything.
Few agree on everything, and since coming to this site my own views have changed a little.
I’m working on some stuff right now, so I don’t have time for a lengthy debate. I don’t fear debate as you enjoy insinuating in your posts with “faleos”, but I think you already have a fair idea of where I stand and it wouldn’t be a productive use of time.
I’ve got something interesting I’ll post shortly though. Maybe I’ll have it up tonight.
Captainchaos on 27 Mar 2009 at 2:42 pm #
“If you’re going to remind everyone of my abstract views on eugenics (for the preservation of Creation against genetic mutations which accumulate within civilised societies where the environment is less harsh) and amalgamation (people should have roots and a place of belonging),”
That is a sound perspective.
“…then you’ll only succeed in getting me to resign from here. I’ll not have the reputation of folks here tarnished by association with some view of little me, so if it appears such is happening then I’ll simply resign.”
White men of vision cannot allow half-witted lemmings to say what goes, otherwise our people and civilization will burn to ashes.
‘La la la, I can’t hear you. If I don’t believe it, it ain’t true,’ simply will not cut it anymore.
“You’re not a futurist or Promethian or whatever,”
I criticize the “Aryan Futurists” at Majority Rights who want to blast off and terraform Mars as a future home for our race, or some such shit. Also I hammer the eugenicist sociopaths who want to round up and sterilize every cross-eyed, drooling sap they can lay hands on.
Of course they are a minority of those associated with Majority Rights. Guessedworker pretty much sets the tone, you will find no more tenacious ‘anti-Nazi’ than he.
“…but you’re not a Christian either,”
Yup, you got me there. Neither are Gottfried and Spencer (but of course you knew that, har har); neither was Francis, btw. But if there is nothing but the material world, and you cannot demonstrate that is not the case, genetics pretty well IS the whole ball of wax, as far as we will ever be concerned. So, we must ensure the genetic continuity and quality of our race, and construct a Christianity that is not a hindrance to said. Christianity was Marxised and turned into a tool to mobilize the goyische rabble to serve their Jewish masters – a purpose for which Christianity is INHERENTLY vulnerable, I’m afraid. Fix it, make it pro-White.
Andrew T. on 27 Mar 2009 at 4:40 pm #
Sam Francis was a Christian, Southern Presbyterian IIRC. I am not sure where this rumor ever got off that he was not a Christian. If he was a “white nationalist” at all, he could be considered only an extremely moderate one within the spectrum of WN.
Materialist science (as opposed to consciousness-primary quantum science) is filled with problems and inconsistencies. For a good refutation of scientific materialism, try reading Dr. Amit Goswami’s “God is Not Dead” (you won’t anyway, since the author is Indian).
I laugh at the proposition of constructing an ahistorical, heretical “positive Christianity” which attempts to cast off all things Jewish (jettisoning the Bible and the historical Jesus with it, naturally).
Captainchaos on 27 Mar 2009 at 7:39 pm #
Andrew, last time I checked the Holohoax was not in the Bible. Are going to dig in your heals on that one? Face it, the beating heart of the Big Lie, Auschwitz, has been ripped out and sent through a meat grinder. So if it be your position that Whitey should perish for what he did to G_d’s Chosen Swindlers, you might want to reconsider.
But…isn’t it unsettling that what you so fervently believed, what for you held such profound moral meaning, has been shown to be a filthy, self-serving little concoction. If the Holohoax, then perhaps other things? Isn’t that really and truly why you hold on so tenaciously?
I can assure you, your race is worth infinitely more than the lies of Jews.
Andrew T. on 27 Mar 2009 at 8:03 pm #
I never said the Holocaust was in the Bible (why muddy the waters?). I have a more or less mainstream view of the it, because I have not gone to great lengths to investigate the more controversial particulars, such as precise numbers of people reported killed/missing etc. In general, though, I have no reason to disbelieve that the basic course of the German Holocaust as reported in standard history books (i.e. millions killed at Auschwitz, Buchenwald, and other concentration camps) occurred. This is nothing new to me…I am of Armenian descent, and the Turkish government denies the very clear evidence that the Armenian Genocide happened, enforcing that official political lie by making it official in all textbooks and school curricula. Someone with a self-serving political agenda will always find a novel way to subvert the mainstream versions of historical events for their own ends.
I don’t believe the scriptures to be the “lies of Jews”, if that is what you imply. Nor do I see how the State of Israel is at some imminent conflict with my own people, culture, or genetic race…perhaps the Palestinians have something to worry about, but like Israel, they have done as terribly much wrong as justifiably right in their side of that conflict.