May
18th 2009
Posted under Ron Paul
Apparently Sen. Graham has heard Ron Paul’s name a few times too often in South Carolina recently as you watch Graham’s reaction at the recent South Carolina state GOP convention. (Thanks to Jack Hunter for this video).
The reaction to Graham’s speech is a clear indication of why Republicans lose and will continue to lose well into the future.
Chris Hewlett on 18 May 2009 at 5:05 pm #
Unfortunately, I don’t think Ron Paul is great on immigration. My impression was that he would just as soon not address the issue.
Captainchaos on 18 May 2009 at 10:34 pm #
“Ron Paul is under Lindsay Graham’s skin and in his mind”
Kinda like with WNs and paleos. LOL!
Weaver on 18 May 2009 at 11:19 pm #
Graham’s strategy for defeating the pro-war Democrats is even more war mongering? Brilliant.
Captainchaos on 19 May 2009 at 12:32 am #
Graham’s strategy to defeat the Democrats is more race betrayal and genocide against the White race.
Weaver’s “strategy” for saving his race is to wait until the country balkanizes and then hide under his bed. LOL! No wonder the Confederacy was defeated.
Weaver on 19 May 2009 at 12:38 am #
Yes, you’re so brave Captain, posting here anonymously from your HQ at the SPLC center.
Andrew T. on 19 May 2009 at 3:50 am #
Ron Paul doesn’t have to be the Tancredo of immigration, FYI. If anything, he does a great balancing act of remaining soft-spoken enough on the issue to keep his very diverse coalition of support unified, while still making his own personal views quite clear.
Weaver, he’s not an SPLC spy. Trust me, I have a sixth sense about this. Captainchaos is no fake; let’s just call a wingnut a wingnut. And it’s sad to see such a smart person throw away his potential like that.
roho on 19 May 2009 at 1:06 pm #
I know no other Southern Republican that makes me want to barf more than “Lindsey Grahamnesty”! (I even believe that he is an Airport “Restroom Incident” waiting to happen?)…..And his re-election shocked me more than any other race.
Weaver on 19 May 2009 at 1:10 pm #
Roho,
someone’s got to pull him out of the closet. That’s probably the only way to dethrone him. It’s almost certain the man’s homo, but there’s no proof atm.
Andrew T. on 19 May 2009 at 4:28 pm #
Weaver,
“It’s almost certain the man’s homo, but there’s no proof atm.”
Then why are you so certain? Yeah, Graham has a certain “something” about his demeanor that could be thought of as effeminate. But to just flat out say he’s a homosexual just for that is insulting and immature.
Chris Hewlett on 19 May 2009 at 4:47 pm #
Calling someone a homosexual is insulting and immature? Where have you been the past thirty years? They’re proud now.
Bruce on 19 May 2009 at 5:47 pm #
It was long time Democratic Senator from South Carolina, Fritz Hollings who first called Graham,”Light in the Loafers,Lindsey” many years ago.
I complained to my friend ,Jim ,who was a neighbor of Graham’s. He assured me that the rumors were true. Showing me Graham’s campaign literature he pointed out that the woman in the family portrait was Graham’s sister and all the kids pictured were hers. This was not disclosed by Graham but obviously anyone seeing Graham’s ads was supposed to assume that the photo was of Lindsey,his wife and kids.
I don’t know 100% that Lindsey is gay but I do know that he is deceitful, and arrogant. He does not represent the conservative people of South Carolina very well. He seems to care more about the illegal Mexican immigrants more than the South Carolina taxpayers.
Maybe that is why the Greenville County Republican Party officially censured Graham after he followed his close friend Juan McCain’s wishes and betrayed his own people last year. When Spartanburg County Republicans were obviously repeating what had just happened in Greenville and voting to censure Graham,Rick Beltram,Spartanburg County Republican Chairman, quickly adjourned the meeting.
Mr. Beltram was just defeated at last month’s county election. I know why and I hope Graham knows why too. Lindsey, this is your last term. Follow McCain on down to Arizona or Mexico,I don’t care.Your political career in South Carolina is on it’s last legs and it is tough to walk in high heel pumps on your last legs,Little Lindsey !
Bruce
roho on 19 May 2009 at 10:53 pm #
Perhaps the “Log Cabin Republicans” know something?
Captainchaos on 19 May 2009 at 11:21 pm #
Get a grip, Weaver. By your lights EVERYTHING to the right of the flaccid pusillanimity that is faileoconservatism is probably a false flag operation. Why? Because faileoism represents the limits of your imagination and courage. That is not my fault.
If it came to it, and your people had to die, you would let them. Wouldn’t you? And if not, just what would you be prepared to do about it?
Weaver on 20 May 2009 at 12:10 am #
CC,
There’s need of a young boy who looks cute in uniform to seduce Graham on video. I’m too cowardly; are you up to the challenge? Take a hit for your race.
Captainchaos on 20 May 2009 at 12:40 am #
LOL!
The only time there is ever any fight from you guys is when you fight the people who try to motivate you to stand up for your race. I don’t get it.
It should cease to be a mystery just why WNs consistently display the keenest minds and the ability to win arguments when a no-holds-barred discussion can be had: the keenest minds come to us because our case is air tight. It is this inveterate thick-skulled obstinacy to truth that makes me HAVE to resort to psychological gamesmanship just to break the mental logjam.
Andrew T. on 21 May 2009 at 4:01 pm #
Captainchaos, the majority of you guys are just numbskull adolescents and young adults who want to feel a part of something and a way to make their hate seem logical. Most WNs that I have encountered on the internet are not as meticulous at rationalizing their BS as you are.
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 6:01 pm #
What are you referring to?
Andrew T. on 22 May 2009 at 6:22 pm #
He’s referring to himself.
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 6:24 pm #
I’m interested in stories, art, architecture, music and the like in a restoration of a healthy culture. The culture of course is meant to serve a people and to serve God. I’m very interested in pursuing this route.
Are bluegrass festivals “disturbed fantasy life”? I dunno what you’re referring to. Feel free to post whatever embarrassing skeletons I’m supposed to have…
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 8:49 pm #
Francis once wrote:
It’s important to fight this…
Captainchaos on 22 May 2009 at 9:31 pm #
Earlier you wrote: “There’s need of a young boy who looks cute in uniform to seduce Graham on video.”
And then: “What are you referring to?”
See above.
Okay, moving on, Spencer is busy LYING again:
http://www.takimag.com/article/white_like_us/
Captainchaos on 22 May 2009 at 10:26 pm #
Weaver, all of American history, from the very beginning, is rooted in the tradition of individualist liberalism. That is your precious culture – liberalism. It proved porous. If our people are to have life we must construct a philosophy grounded in the BEING of European Man. A culture that is the expression of our BEING. And only those of unalloyed European descent can BE European.
Now, there, is something serious that you MUST be able to answer, otherwise you will have been shown to be intellectually unserious. What is your answer?
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 10:45 pm #
Ohh, lol. Well, you nearly hit another mark, several marks actually, but that would have been a misunderstanding.
I guess the joke’s on me then :p
—
Spencer writes:
This is one point I’ll partially agree with. A truly healthy, organic order is hierarchical rather than ruled by the mob, and it views society itself as an organism rather than as a grouping of individuals.
There’s frequently a rejection of racial identity for fear of it becoming too abstract, viewing man not as a soul but as a genetic code, and his point seems to be to define a people as more than genetics, including location, social ties, language, culture, etc. That’s a relatively popular alternative to full blown racial identity, especially since so many of us aren’t entirely pure white (this doesn’t apply to me so far as I’m aware).
Also, in an attempt to combat dual morality, it’s relatively popular to allow (and actually embrace) a small degree of mixing so as to ensure all identify as one species.
I guess you’re fully aware of that though…
I might comment on this more later after I’ve read it more carefully.
You should be pleased with this at least:
Isn’t that “naming the Jew”?
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 11:02 pm #
Even in Raspail’s Camp of the Saints he mentions that some aliens would be in defense of the white West.
—
With genetic engineering on the horizon and with modern society growing increasingly transient, genetics will grow to be increasingly important as a source of identity.
I’m very much opposed to amalgamation because of the children who suffer from such experiments or sins of lust. It’s all well and good to say two people should be free to have sex, but when children are produced it becomes a more complicated issue… The children are eternally outcasts and are confused. And the identity of the people and ties to ancestors are of course weakened. And over hundreds of years of course a genetic change could require a political and cultural revolution to correct for the change in society, as you’ll be apt to point out. So, it’s not really wanted. Though at the same time not all amalgamations are created equal, e.g. northern Italians are very similar to Englishmen. In the South “amalgamation” usually refers to sub-Sahara west Africans and northwest Europeans mixing. And here those of us who actually know what the fruits of such lust produce understand its danger. The blacks are especially cruel to such children – and similarly to albino blacks.
Kipling defended diversity of nations well in The Stranger.
Bede (an editor here) used to have a favourite quote on the diversity of nations being the wealth of mankind. I can’t place whom it’s a quote of though…
Weaver on 22 May 2009 at 11:17 pm #
CC,
you’re specifically attached to a people.
Many paleos however are attached to order and stability. A slow change for them then isn’t significant.
I can’t help but admit that between the two, you’re the more human for having an actual attachment.
Captainchaos on 23 May 2009 at 8:54 pm #
“I can’t place whom it’s a quote of though…”
It is from Solzhenitsyn.
“…it’s relatively popular to allow (and actually embrace) a small degree of mixing so as to ensure all identify as one species.”
That is a very feeble argument. One could very well argue that it is best that the Sistine Chapel be painted over, at least slightly, so that we not forget its commonality with other paintings; rubbish. Nothing is gained by defacing a masterpiece. Any comeback to that?
And THAT is really why they shut down the comments section at Taki; because I so adeptly demolished their “arguments”. Those “men” with Ph.D.’s and Ivy League educations; rather shameful I think. And after I openly challenged them, as men, to debate me.
Of course Andrew T. is more than capable of filling their capacious shoes. LOL!
Attack the System » Blog Archive » Updated News Digest May 24, 2009 on 24 May 2009 at 11:21 pm #
[...] Ron Paul is Under Lindsey Graham’s Skin by Patroon [...]
LadyM on 25 May 2009 at 11:48 am #
There’s a great book all about Graham called “This Dog Don’t Hunt” by J. Danny Strickland. It tells all about how he hoodwinked the SC voters into electing him and what his agenda is. If you can find it give it a read. He is a sleazeball of the highest quality !
D B Allyn on 25 May 2009 at 2:36 pm #
Close friends in SC who are politically astute tell me that Graham is queer – no doubt about it. That may help him rise to a very high position in the GOP – look what being queer has done for Barney Fag in the Dems.
If you can’t be black, be queer.
Andrew T. on 25 May 2009 at 9:01 pm #
Lindsay Graham is not a homosexual until I have solid proof of it, not myth and rumor. I don’t know how the rest of you chums think about controversial matters, but that’s my two cents.
D B Allyn on 27 May 2009 at 4:27 am #
The question is – if Barney Frank retires, who will go after his seat ?
Joseph on 15 Oct 2009 at 6:56 am #
Hey. Lindsay Graham is more of a man than most. He is courageous, honest, level-headed desipite some of his ignorant, hate-filled constiuency. Keep up the good work Lindsay! America is changing and Mr Graham recognizes this fact. The old south is a relic of the past.
jeb bush on 12 Mar 2010 at 8:29 pm #
The old south is going straight to hell.
Christopher Nelson on 21 Mar 2010 at 10:47 am #
Maybe Ron Paul is not Graham’s type. I think he prefers men in uniform like Mccain. Graham, just another useless RINO, moderate republican. Of no use to anybody who is a true conservative.
Obviously a sodomite. He is very effeminate. Also Lindsey, what about the parts of the bible forbidding homosexuality? Little sassy queen.
He and Barney Slurping Frank, need to get together and move to san fransisco. I am sick of sodomites, and other immoral people running this country. The government is full of devils, some obvious, others are wolves in sheeps clothing. They must be exorcised out.