May
22nd 2009
Posted under Polls
Vote for Roy Moore for Governor of Alabama at John Killian’s blog. John Killian is a pastor, and you may recall him from his speech in support of Ron Paul which went viral during the 2008 presidential election campaign.
Michael Hill on 23 May 2009 at 5:29 pm #
Actually, Tim James (son of former Ala. Gov. Fob James) has been friendlier and more accessible to The League of the South than has Roy Moore. While Moore is not hostile to the League and its ideas, James has spoken at several LS meetings over the years and is still quite supportive of us. In other words, there are two good Republican candidates for governor in Alabama.
Captainchaos on 23 May 2009 at 8:38 pm #
Filmer, a serious question, at least to me, What is Roy Moore’s position on miscegenation?
Andrew T. on 24 May 2009 at 4:42 am #
He doesn’t have one, because he’s concerned with more pressing matters than radical racist abstractions.
Captainchaos on 24 May 2009 at 12:51 pm #
“…radical racist abstractions.”
We are a flesh-and-blood people. There is nothing “abstract” about it.
Read:
“We have analyzed genetic data for 326 microsatellite markers that were typed uniformly in a large multiethnic
population-based sample of individuals as part of a study of the genetics of hypertension (Family Blood Pressure
Program). Subjects identified themselves as belonging to one of four major racial/ethnic groups (white, African
American, East Asian, and Hispanic) and were recruited from 15 different geographic locales within the United States
and Taiwan. Genetic cluster analysis of the microsatellite markers produced four major clusters, which showed
near-perfect correspondence with the four self-reported race/ethnicity categories. Of 3,636 subjects of varying race/
ethnicity, only 5 (0.14%) showed genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity. On
the other hand, we detected only modest genetic differentiation between different current geographic locales within
each race/ethnicity group. Thus, ancient geographic ancestry, which is highly correlated with self-identified race/
ethnicity—as opposed to current residence—is the major determinant of genetic structure in the U.S. population.
Implications of this genetic structure for case-control association studies are discussed.” – Tang H, Quertermous T, Rodriguez B, et al. Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies. Am J Hum Genet. Feb 2005;76(2):268-275.
And notice the above excerpted study concerns hypertension, genetics and ancestry. I suppose you will next say we cannot be concerned with cardiovascular health for it is too “abstract”, though it is of central importance to the flesh-and-blood life of individuals. Your wholly received alien sensibilities are the true “abstractions”.
roho on 24 May 2009 at 5:17 pm #
Michael Hill…………Tht’s intresting, as I do remember Fob James as Governor, and his fight for “Tort Reform”…….Don’t know much about his son?
Andrew T. on 25 May 2009 at 12:54 am #
Race is not an abstraction, but a fact. Your wacky, myopic racist ideology is the abstraction.
Captainchaos on 25 May 2009 at 1:14 am #
Is White-flight also an abstraction? Is the clear fact that White people prefer to company of their own kind, despite what they give lip service to, an abstraction? Is it the desire to preserve the flesh-and-blood life of our people so very abstract?
Your position is simply wrong. Face it, you have been lied to all your life. It cannot be easy to acknowledge it. Yet one must eventually face the truth.
Captainchaos on 25 May 2009 at 1:15 am #
That should read: “Is the desire to preserve…”
Andrew T. on 25 May 2009 at 2:00 am #
“Is it the desire to preserve the flesh-and-blood life of our people so very abstract?”
No, the desire to turn the world on its head is an abstraction.
Captainchaos on 25 May 2009 at 2:24 am #
The world has been turned on its head away from what is healthy and natural by our enemies. To do what is right is to restore what is good. I have no problem getting Black people I converse with to agree that loyalty and primary concern for one’s own people is natural, and that race is a part of the Created Order. Wealthy Blacks in Atlanta CHOOSE to live in predominantly Black suburbs, and resent Whites moving in. Black women don’t approve of Black men cavorting with White women, and racially conscious Black men want Black children. The God of the Old Testament CLEARLY does not approve of inter-marriage. Nor does the Bible disapprove of slavery (I disapprove of it though, because it is cruel and degrading, and it is just one more manifestation of wealthy Whites attempting to undercut the wages of their co-ethnics – it is race treason.) – which apparently your ancestors took more seriously than you do. Just what is your major malfunction?
There is simply no good reason that we should agree to cease to exist. A great crime is being committed against us. I, at least, resent it, and will do what I can to fight it.
Andrew T. on 25 May 2009 at 3:09 am #
Race is very important, and to deny it is disingenuous. And yet, the many problems in this world can be examined in so many other ways. And yet, you have chosen to elevate race to the end-all and be-all, the first principle. This is not a good thing. This world can no more realistically be expected to function as a raceocracy than as an anarchy.
You accused Weaver of disturbed fantasies because he has — God help us! — hobbies. I accuse you of it because I think that genetic reductionism is a disturbed fantasy. Freud was bad science, but how are you better than he was?
Captainchaos on 25 May 2009 at 4:15 am #
“This world can no more realistically be expected to function as a raceocracy than as an anarchy.”
Uh, just wft do you suppose the old South essentially functioned as? Like National Socialist Germany, it did not crumble from within, but was merely militarily defeated.
“You accused Weaver of disturbed fantasies because he has — God help us! — hobbies.”
And previous to that Weaver suggested I take it in the ass from Lindsey Graham. I suppose I could have responded with “Fuck you, you goddamn cocksucker!”, but that would have been much less dignified. LOL! I’m sure Weaver can handle a little tit-for-tat.
“I accuse you of it because I think that genetic reductionism is a disturbed fantasy.”
There are limits to the possible. If I shoot a man in the head he will no longer be capable of writing a sonnet. If I short circuit his genetically programed growth from embryo, to fetus, to baby, to child, to adolescent, to man, nor will be able to; his brain/mind will not have achieved peak functionality in that instance either as with that moment after I shot him in the head. Africans don’t write sonnets, Africans don’t make Sistine Chapels – neither Jews – White men do. Stop pointing that goddamn gun at the head of your own people.
P.S. Damn I wish Spencer or Gottfried had had the balls to debate me. I would have run a buzz saw clean through them. I particularly like contests of oneupsmanship with verbose Jews. Once a Jew told me that my brain worked better than his. My message to them, ‘Taki Mag is my house now.’ LOL! I would DEARLY love to debate some of those hardcore Straussian twits. Even Strauss conceded the Hellenic relationship to wisdom is wonder, whilst the Hebraic responds to wisdom with fear. (Of course Strauss was himself the student of the manly German National Socialist Martin Heidegger – who was the former’s vastly intellectual superior.) Wisdom: The White race has a genetically based superiority of civilization building capacity. And when those womanly cowards start to scream about Auntie Semite’s canards, in the face of indisputable fact, I can only laugh. They hate us in large part because they envy us, because we were born beautiful, heroic, ingenious; kings among men. What sweet revenge merely living as ourselves will be.
Weaver on 25 May 2009 at 12:32 pm #
No no, that was just a misunderstanding. He was saying I have fantasies because I’d made the comment regarding CC obtaining proof that Sen. Graham is homo. So, it was only a jest on his part.
I appreciate your coming to my defense though.
Captainchaos on 25 May 2009 at 2:57 pm #
That could be useful to know. But isn’t that the kinda stuff that one of the talons on the claw of Organized Jewry, the SPLC, traffics in; scuttlebutt? Aren’t we supposed to be better than them and not stoop to their methods? Or is a least mild ruthlessness justified at some point? We know what Gottfried would say, as he did contra bourgeois WASP fair play commenting on the liquidation of Buckley Jr. But then again Gottfried is one of the Chosen. But then again those filthy Krauts weren’t above excelling the Chosen at their own game, at least in some instances. And then again General Lee said that if he had known what the Yanks were to do to his people after his surrender he would have ordered his men into the hills where they would be duty bound to fight to the last man insurgent style. But that is why National Socialism arose after Versailles. And that is why Germans fought on nearly to the last man as long as their beloved Fuhrer lived and wished it. Hmmm.
Spencer and Gottfried, why would neither of you debate me, eh?
Andrew T. on 26 May 2009 at 3:30 am #
“Like National Socialist Germany, it did not crumble from within, but was merely militarily defeated.”
Militarism is inherent in the NS ideology, and militarism can not be sustained. Marxism is radicalism that uses universalist rhetoric; Hitler’s and Mussolini’s ideologies built on xenophobia and nationalism.
Even if you consider the old South to be an example of a raceocracy (and totally dissimilar to the worldwide ideological raceocracy you seem to prefer, mind you), it’s a rather self-incriminating example.
“Africans don’t make Sistine Chapels – neither Jews – White men do.”
You’re right, Jews don’t build Sistine Chapels. They build Temples of Jerusalem. Then again, I prefer to judge individual people as people and not by the technological achievements of their race. This is not cheap morality. It is morality.
Spencer and Gottfried would not debate you for the same reason that one does not throw pearls to swine. Even worse is the swine who is so arrogant and neurotic that he fancies himself to be some sort of intellectually omnipotent ubermensch. And just where is “Straussian” coming from? There isn’t a bona fide Straussian to be found at Taki Mag.
Andrew T. on 26 May 2009 at 3:30 am #
“Like National Sociailist Germany, it did not crumble from within, but was merely militarily defeated.”
Militarism is inherent in the NS ideology, and militarism can not be sustained. Marxism is radicalism that uses universalist rhetoric; Hitler’s and Mussolini’s ideologies built on xenophobia and nationalism.
Even if you consider the old South to be an example of a raceocracy (and totally dissimilar to the worldwide ideological raceocracy you seem to prefer, mind you), it’s a rather self-incriminating example.
“Africans don’t make Sistine Chapels – neither Jews – White men do.”
You’re right, Jews don’t build Sistine Chapels. They build Temples of Jerusalem. Then again, I prefer to judge individual people as people and not by the technological achievements of their race. This is not cheap morality. It is morality.
Spencer and Gottfried would not debate you for the same reason that one does not throw pearls to swine. Even worse is the swine who is so arrogant and neurotic that he fancies himself to be some sort of intellectually omnipotent ubermensch. And just where is “Straussian” coming from? There isn’t a bona fide Straussian to be found at Taki Mag.
Captainchaos on 26 May 2009 at 10:52 pm #
“Hitler’s and Mussolini’s ideologies built on xenophobia and nationalism.”
No shit.
“Militarism is inherent in the NS ideology, and militarism can not be sustained.”
The intensity need not be sustained at that high a pitch, only until the existence of our race is secured by reconquering all of our former lands.
“You’re right, Jews don’t build Sistine Chapels. They build Temples of Jerusalem.”
Jews have a lower average visio-spatial IQ than Whites. Their “achievements” are dwarfed by the Greeks alone.
“There isn’t a bona fide Straussian to be found at Taki Mag.”
No shit. But I have a personal axe to grind with the Straussians.
“Then again, I prefer to judge individual people as people and not by the technological achievements of their race.”
Your life, in all senses, is dependent upon your race whether you like it or not.
Andrew T. on 27 May 2009 at 5:54 pm #
Dude, the “reconquest” of former white lands will never happen. It would require a significant amount of White people to like you. And nobody likes you.