September
14th 2009
Posted under Conservatism & Media & Political Philosophy
A “Tenther,” you know, one of those crazed wackos who wants the Fed Gove to follow the Tenth Amendment.
Here MSNBC liberal shill David Shuster calls the Tenth Amendment “a bunch of bologna” and cites the “general welfare” clause as proof. His argument is laughably easy to disprove historically. Is he really that clueless regarding the history of the “general welfare” clause debate?
D B Allyn on 14 Sep 2009 at 1:27 pm #
David Shuster is just another jew who attempts to discredit any cause which would even hint at retarding governmemt intervention and growth.
Stonewall on 16 Sep 2009 at 2:00 am #
Tell him to look up the word “welfare” in Webster’s 1828.
D B Allyn on 18 Sep 2009 at 3:56 pm #
Stonewall – excellent point. Sadly, the intellectual prowess of many today limits such research.
Ryan on 28 Sep 2009 at 3:47 am #
I’m glad he’s so insightful as to treat the Tenth Amendment as meaningless even though it’s a part of the Constitution (as ratified), as if other parts nullify the Constitution itself.