February
2nd 2011
Which is it, Observer?
HarrisonBergeron2

Posted under Humor & Race

“[Y]ou cannot tell someone’s race from their DNA.” From Charlotte Observer editorial ridiculing Jared Taylor

“Foxx learns his African roots: DNA test reveals he’s descended from Nigeria’s Fulani people, a tribe of nomads, herdsmen, warriors.” Charlotte Observer story on city’s black mayor

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | chatintamil

7 Comments »

7 Responses to “Which is it, Observer?”

  1. Bede on 02 Feb 2011 at 10:20 pm #

    You can’t determine race from someone’s DNA?

    http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2010/08/connect-dots.html

    Oh really?

  2. Captainchaos on 03 Feb 2011 at 12:50 am #

    To my eye there seems to be amongst paleocons a lingering fear that to do what is needed to achieve racial separation would be at least as affects their personal interests far worse than to bear the slings and arrows of “anarcho-tyranny”. It is the beginning of wisdom to realize that this is precisely an inversion of the truth. It is wisdom achieved to know who implanted that sentiment in themselves in the first place (you know who). That done, they will know that it is the Other, for his own parasitic and genocidal aims, who had conditioned them to fear the defense of their own peoplehood as the Other fears such a defense – to internalize the fears and aspirations of the Other as their own. That is what it means to be an “extended phenotype” and to have ceased to be one.

  3. HarrisonBergeron2 on 03 Feb 2011 at 12:59 am #

    Bede,

    The Observer is promoting a local museum’s display that promotes the doctrine that “science” has proven race doesn’t exist. I wish I could get its editors to read Dr. Hsu’s homepage.

    If they did, I bet you could hear their brains screeching to a halt.

  4. HarrisonBergeron2 on 03 Feb 2011 at 1:00 am #

    Captain Chaos,

    I’m getting my money back on that gibberish detector I installed on this site. It obviously isn’t working.

  5. Weaver on 03 Feb 2011 at 2:03 am #

    CC,

    wrong site?

  6. Captainchaos on 03 Feb 2011 at 5:36 am #

    This is the problem with subtlety deployed in an effort to not scare the horses: no one gets it.

    What I meant to say is: “it is [THE JEWS!], for [their] own parasitic and genocidal aims, who ha[ve] conditioned [LEMMINGS] to fear the defense of [THE LEMMINGS'] own peoplehood as [THE JEWS!!] fear such a defense [of White peoplehood] – to internalize the fears and aspirations of [THE JEWS!!!] as [THE LEMMINGS'] own.”

    You see, if you believe full-blown National Socialism in defense of the existence of our race is something to be feared more than the slow mongrelization genocide of our race then you are still in the grip of Jewish brainwashing. That is precisely what the Jews would want you to think.

    I’m not necessarily saying it will come to full-blown National Socialisim, but what if it did come to that? A dupe and brainwashed tool of the Jews would say, “No. Better racial death than National Socialism.” Until one fully overcomes this Jewish brainwashing he cannot be said to be truly racial conscious.

    I take it now I’ve been understood.

  7. Captainchaos on 05 Feb 2011 at 12:08 pm #

    Okay. More to the point of this post. I am aware of a genetic study which confirms that self-identified ethnicity/race coincides with the results of genetic testing at a rate of over 98%. This is a direct refutation of the race as “social construct” trope. Moreover, it is rock-solid validation of the PERCEPTION that race is real. As is said, “Who will you believe, me or your lying eyes?” Well, now we have scientific proof that our eyes do not lie.

    I’ll post the abstract of the study with accompanying citation upon request.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply