April
28th 2011
From Afghanistan with love..
Patroon

Posted under CoffeeTime & Interventionism

Want to know how our efforts in Afghanistan are being appreciated by the Afghans themselves? Well one of our erstwhile allies whom we were sent to liberate repaid us with killing nine U.S. servicemen in cold blood. I’m glad to see they’re so greatful as to shoot us. Here we are putting our lives on the frontline just so Afghans can kill us in the back. And get this, you’re paying for it!

Just come home.

Some more articles for your consideration…

Charles Murray’s recent lecture shows us the racial divide isn’t as great as the classist divide.

From Antiwar.com: “Rescue the GOP from the Interventionists”

From J.J Jackson at Liberty Reborn “The Psuedo-Conservatives Wail”

From SARTRE at BATR: “Hedge Fund Speculators and their Poverty Premiums.”

Ron Paul critque’s Ben Bernake’s groundbreaking press conference, the one Paul forced the Fed Chairman to make given his attacks upon the institution.

Pat Buchanan over at Chronicles: “When Dictators Fall, who Rises?

Leon Hadar at TAC: “Israel’s Other Demographic Problem”

Thomas Naylor at Second Vermont Republic: “Small Nation Neutrality, An Alternative to Obsessive Compulsive Military Might”

 

 

delicious | digg | reddit | facebook | technorati | stumbleupon | chatintamil

3 Comments »

3 Responses to “From Afghanistan with love..”

  1. Bruce on 28 Apr 2011 at 2:23 pm #

    I think there’s been 20+ servicemen killed in this manner in Afghanistan since the beginning of the year. Just come home indeed.

    “Charles Murray’s recent lecture shows us the racial divide isn’t as great as the classist divide.”

    The article provided very little data to show us the working class/middle class divide is greater than the black/white divide. For example, how does the gap between working class & middle class rates of illegitimacy compare with the gap between black and white (around 50 percentage points, I believe) rates of illegitimacy? Is the working class/middle class gap really larger than 50 percentage points ?

    The article supposses it’s telling us something new and shattering stereotypes (“letting the cat out of the bag”). Like we don’t know there’s a lot of white trash and they’re getting worse. No s___, Sherlock/Milloy/Murray! And who carries around stereotypes of inherently virtuous and industrious whites these days anyway? What a strawman. The whole article’s full of fallacious arguments. Yeah, there’s so many people extolling the virtues of working class whites and ridiculing blacks. Yeah, I see that all the time! Yes, I see brown and black people used as scapegoats all the time because anyone with eyes sees that both whites and mainstream publications feel free to say bad things about brown and black people whenever they want !!!

    My uncle has 4 illegitimate kids with his common law wife and bums off the government and my poor, elderly grandmother. Of course, he’s never gone up to an innocent young girl sitting at a desk and dry-humped her head so I guess I still see a kind of divide. And he’s the father of all 4 of her kids rather than one of four fathers.

    And common sense suggests that any sane person would choose working class Pepin over working class Detroit any day even if the Detroit houses are cheaper.

  2. RedPhillips on 28 Apr 2011 at 5:47 pm #

    The Doug Bandow article (“Rescue the GOP…”) is excellent.

  3. Bede on 28 Apr 2011 at 6:52 pm #

    “the racial divide isn’t as great as the classist divide.”

    So said Karl Marx, but he was wrong.

    This is how the leftist media interpret Murray’s article but it’s not what Murray says. He says that lower-class whites are beginning to act like blacks in some ways (illegitimacy). Note, though, that the data for lower-class whites even in these areas nowhere reach the numbers for blacks. Also, in others respects, the white-black divide (in terms of IQ, standardized test scores, or crime) is just as wide as ever.

    Also, history just doesn’t bear out that “the racial divide isn’t as great as the classist divide.” It all depends.

    As many others have argued, only in racially homogenous societies has class become of overwhelming importance. When all people are all alike racially, then they will self-segregate via class.

    But in multi-ethnic societies, race will trump class. Think Yugoslavia. Nearly 50 years of Marxist propaganda telling everyone that class is fundamental and when the gov. teeters, people quickly divide by ethnicity (not class).

    I can give many other examples from recent history.

    As Jerry Z. Muller said in a recent piece at Foreign Affairs, the vast majority of world conflict is along ethnic (not class) lines. This was even true during the Cold War:

    http://www.vdare.com/rushton/090820_ethnonationalism.htm

    Karl Marx was just flat wrong about class being the fundamental division among men.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply