Posted under Political Correctness
Update: Regarding Anders Behring Breivik’s motivation, apparently a video produced by him and a manifesto written by him are circulating around the internet.
——-
What Anders Behring Breivik did is horrible and will be used by the anti-Western left to attempt to silence critics of Third World immigration into Europe.
Here are some of the alleged writings of Breivik. The website Islam vs. Europe has made available translations from his writings at document.no:
The problem is that it often does not help about 80% of Muslims are “moderates”, ie they ignore the Quran. “It takes very few people to overthrow a plane.”
What percentage is the Taliban of Pakistan’s population? 1%, 3%, 5%? And how much chaos is there today?
In every society where Islam exists there will be a certain percentage of the Muslims who actually follow the traditional interpretations of the Koran.
And then we have the relationship between conservative Muslims and so-called “moderate Muslims”.
There is moderate Nazis, too, that does not support fumigation of rooms and Jews. But they’re still Nazis and will only sit and watch as the conservatives Nazis strike (if it ever happens). If we accept the moderate Nazis as long as they distance themselves from the fumigation of rooms and Jews?
Now it unfortunately already cut himself with Marxists who have already infiltrated-culture, media and educational organizations. These individuals will be tolerated and will even work as professors and lecturers at colleges / universities and are thus able to spread their propaganda.
For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differ. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies. Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazi might, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to enter a club, be conservative, etc.
It is obvious that the moderate supporters of hate-ideologies, at a later date may choose conservatism.
Islam (ism) has historically led to 300 million deaths
Communism has historically led to 100 million deaths
Nazism has historically led to 6-20 million deathsALL hate ideologies should be treated equally.
According to two studies supports 13% of young British Muslims between 15 and 25 Al Qaeda ideology. UK representative for Norway, so I would guess that at least 15-20% of Norwegian Muslims support murder of gays. There is certainly no fewer that supports the killing of gays than to support Al Qaeda.
I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant retoriker and communicator, one of the best we’ve seen over the past 30 years.
But firstly, we can not and should not compare the cultural struggle in the U.S. with that in Europe. Rhetoric must and should be different. The average “right click” – Republican in the U.S. is a “libertarian” (anti-socialist but pro multikulti) while the average conservative in Europe is much more anti-multikulti but arguments based on cultural resistance against Islamization.
The so-called anti-multiculti in the U.S. based their rhetoric on ethnocentrism alone which thus differs greatly from Europeans. This is the main reason that we must separate the American and European cultural struggle. I usually stay away from American issues as a result.
Regardless of whether we are in the U.S. or Europe, it is essential you have to ask about the following:
When was that multiculturalism ceased to be an ideology designed to deconstruct a European culture, traditions, identity and nation-states? If you support a leader who propagate multikulti (ideology as of this writing systematically deconstructs Western civilization), one can not then just as well stick to the class struggle or the MSM?
And if we then think that multiculturalism wonderful doctrines is the main cause of the ongoing Islamization of Europe and the U.S., one should not criticize multiculturalism while leading No. 1, the one Jesus Christ Obama for his fundamental principles?
Failure to criticize him, you have not then accepted the multiculturalism wonderful premise?
There are political forces in Oslo who want to mass-act subsidized / low cost “Islam-blocks” in Oslo West for “better integration”. As far as I know, only the Progress Party / Conservatives who oppose the moment so it can actually become a reality over the next decade.
If this ever becomes the case, many of Oslo West move to Bærum (and most will eventually follow).
Hm, but where do you move when this policy when Bærum?
“Globalization and modernity are irreversible phenomena. ”
Classic multiculturalism drug propaganda. What is globalization and modernity to do with mass Muslim immigration?
And you may not have heard and Japan and South Korea? These are successful and modern regimes even if they rejected multiculturalism in the 70′s. Are Japanese and South Koreans goblins?
Can you name ONE country where multiculturalism is successful where Islam is involved? The only historical example is the society without a welfare state with only non-Muslim minorities (U.S.).
This I expect that everyone knows when it is elementary documented truths.
What I can never understand is why multiculturalism seats (which traditionally has consisted of and / or have been supported by the labor movement) have failed to understand that multiculturalism will destroy the future welfare (as social Cohesion / confidence / willingness to let the tax) dollars in line with the spread of multiculturalism?
Best case scenario for Europe is that we end up with a super-capitalist system such as the U.S. with large sub-class / class differences.
It does not sound very humanistic out:) But then we are certainly not goblins anymore?
It’s getting only two basic concepts many use to describe the cultural point of view.
Conservative Culture (of order preservation / patiot / nationalist / monokulturalist) and kulturmarxistisk (internationalist / multiculturalists / kosmopolitanist / globalist).
Although the majority of humanists but also many liberals are anti-nationalists, and is therefore by definition kulturmarxister. Promote either multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) or monoculture (nationalist), there is nothing in between, even though most do not dare to admit this yet. Well, there’s the multi-culture without Islam is a middle ground.
However, it is possible that THE does not meet the criteria for a Marxist / Communist but all internationalists are kulturmarxister.
It’s also a known fact that street newspaper is an anarcho-Marxist newspaper and NOT an anarchist newspaper. Anarchism can be both Marxist-oriented and nationalist-oriented. Street newspaper is far from nationalistic one can get;)
The old definitions often do not apply anymore. Eg. the British Tories who actually still dare to call themselves conservatives support kulturmarxisme / multiculturalism and should be renamed.
One can not support kulturmarxisme / multiculturalism and simultaneously call themselves conservative, although some might not agree with me:)
The majority on the right side has unfortunately not yet found out that one must defeat multiculturalism in order to defeat the Islamization as many still see themselves as multiculturalists.
This will inevitably change and clarified to a greater extent for most of the next decade when the polarization will increase.
Sometime in the future, most will have to flag the point of view, you will have to make a choice: nationalism or internationalism.
Unfortunately, there is still much stigma attached to the word “nationalism” as I usually use the word culture conservative:)
I have never understood why the West focus so disproportionately on Iran and so little on the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, which after all is the most dangerous and most powerful Muslim central power. We should, of course, as soon as the bombing suspect their facilities but otherwise focus much more on Saudi. Could it be something that Iran is not a major oil exporter?
Shias make up a relatively small proportion of Muslims and has absolutely no influence on the Sunnis.
I would actually argue that we undermine our own interests by unilaterally attacking the only relatively weak alternative to Sunni Islam. If Iran falls to Wahhabi position strengthened considerably, since they have no competitors.
We should not forget that Saudi Arabia and several other Sunni Muslim countries want to destroy Iran. Nor is Iran that has built 300-500 Wahhabi centers around around Europe of the finances only 2 of 30 Jihad Fronts around the around the world.
He says he he’s writing a book. Maybe the attack was a publicity stunt for his book?
You raise many interesting points. I’ve even made lists of these networks, which I will launch my book. It is essential to counter this is to continue the consolidation (the paste into charts earlier of specific tasks and activities, annual plans etc. to systematically regain control of specific NGOs and strengthen the cultural conservatives of all 7 different political fronts. Another important task is to create a cultural conservative media company with national distribution. We are in the process.
Ang your choice of an ideological basis. 50 years of efforts by the ethnocentric organizations / movements (from 1960-2009) has failed completely. We know this and further focus, illumination of these strategies will only be counter-productive and potentially very damaging to the current Norwegian and European cultural conservative movement.
Ethnocentric movements that BNP, National Front is not successful and will never be able to get over 10% support (GDP 5%, the UN has 7%). One can not fight racism (multikulti) with racism. Ethnocentrism is therefore the complete opposite of what we want to achieve.
We have selected the Vienna School of Thought as the ideological basis. This implies opposition to multiculturalism and Islamization (on cultural grounds). All ideological arguments based on anti-racism.
This has proven to be very successful which explains why the modern cultural conservative movement / parties that use the Vienna School of Thought is so successful: the Progress Party, Geert Wilders, document and many others.
Ethnocentrism is contrary to the principles of the Vienna School of Thought which is why you surely have been censored in the past.
I have worked several years for the Progress Party and guarantee you that the Progress Party had less than 10% support if they had not chosen Vienna School of Thought as an ideological basis.
Yes, we will defeat the multiculturalism / kulturmarxisme finally (as this is very discriminatory and racist). But we must do it in the correct ideological grounds.
It is very important that we here in the document does not restrict our “political commitment” to this page. There is great political upheavals taking place in Western Europe at this moment (a subversion of gressrotnivå). The cultural conservative movement is growing at record speed and it is a consolidation process going on in all Western European countries. ANYONE can contribute and every contribution counts:) The best thing you can do in Norway is to support Dokument.no either financially or through volunteer work. Visit the various Norwegian debate forum and market articles on the Dokument.no. With dedicated effort, I am sure that the document has the potential to become the new “Event”.
He will soon present their ideas for how this can be done.
I recommend to you all also strongly recommended to extend Facebook their networks, using the daily quota of 50 invitations to connect with Brits, French, Swedes, etc. Join groups that SIOE – Stop the Islamisation of Europe, Against Multiculturalism, join Progress Party, if anything:)
Watch the pages gatesofvienna, brussels journal, Jihad Watch, religionofpeace etc.
Read Fjord Man’s work “Defeating Eurabia”. This is f as the perfect Christmas gift for family and friends.
Add: Analekta Informatics on Facebook. This group communicates news articles that are unknown to most people. Very good news that the document can use if desired.
It is especially important that we, the Norwegian cultural conservatives, are making an effort. Norway and Sweden are among the world’s most repressive regimes the press (press censorship) when it comes to a critical view of Islamization and multiculturalism.
The biggest mistake most people make is they assume that “someone else” to make efforts for them. There is no other, it’s just us;)
Looking forward to meeting as many as possible of you on Thursday:). Let’s hope his not choose Blitz Café or International:)).
tell me one country where Muslims have lived peacefully with non-Muslims without the Jihad against Kafr (dhimmitude, systematic slaughter or demographic warfare)?
I could name 40 countries / areas where this has had catastrophic consequences for non-Muslims. Can you please name ONE single example where it has managed to assimilate the Muslims? You seem limitless naive. Of course, some integrate but it is completely the result that counts (everything else is irrelevant).
How many thousands of new Europeans must die, how many one hundred thousand European women should be raped, millions robbed and tractor discarded before you understand that multiculturalism + Islam does not work?
Why do you think Norway will be the first country in the world for the last 1400 years in which this will succeed?
History repeats itself forever.
Here he blames the Muslim vote for stymieing the success of the (right-wing) Progress Party.
Well, the essence is that Muslim boys learn æreskodekser, pride in their own religion, culture and cultural conservative values ??at home while Norwegian men have been feminized and teacher excessive tolerance. This makes them totally unprepared for what awaits them … The curriculum at the school now consists also largely of the demonization of our ancestors (evil imperialists, big farmers who raped maids, bloodthirsty Crusaders who invaded the peaceful Muslims) as it gives a victim the role of Muslims. The result is that Norwegian girls aged 12-18 are particularly vulnerable and often oppressed. They lack pride, æreskodekser and a correct understanding of Islam.
There have now been a mass exodus of non-Muslims from Oslo East in 20 years, even if the media refuses to cover this trend. The reason is simple. People do not want to be oppressed, they do not want to live like other citizens rangs (dhimmitude). Parents observe but can not do much. There are of course very dependent on the situation. If it is 50% Muslims in school or only 2%. It is often easiest to move in instead of letting your child carry the “integration issue” on their shoulders.
In many ways intensified the polarization between Muslim and non-Muslim youth among the younger generations. There are ten times as many Muslim gangs as non-Muslim. Abuse and harassment is perceived as clear racism and frustration is high because the media ignores this racism in total. 100 racial / Jihadi murder of Norwegians in the last 15 years are totally ignored as a single murder of a Norwegian racist resulting in a torchlight procession in which 50 000 participants and establishing a Memorial Fund.
Many young people are apathetic as a result, others are very racist.
I got the impression that the younger generations in Oslo not quite manage to see the political context here. They see the racist attack but do not fully understand that this is Jihad (political / cultural attacks). They repay why they perceive as racism with racism.
My hope is that they will see the cultural / political context, but one should not ignore the fact that the new generations of young people going in the direction of ethnocentrism.
Young people need solutions, and currently there are no anti-racist youth culture conservative options. Some people choose the options that exist, that it is ethnocentric.
I dare not even think of how many Norwegian children who have been suicide because of these experiences (assault, robbery, rape, psychological terror committed by Muslim youths). There are probably several hundred in the last 15 years.
Well, this is certainly part of the reason that the Progress Party was larger than the AP at the last school elections …
The special thing here is that if we had removed the Muslim vote at the last school elections in Oslo, the Progress Party ended up about 30-40% support.
Non-Muslim youth in Oslo aged 12-18 are in a particularly vulnerable situation in terms of harassment of Muslim youth. I myself am born and raised here and chose out of necessity to the friendships / alliances with A and B team to move freely. The alternative is that you stick to your neighborhood or west side. I know of hundreds of incidents where non-Muslims were robbed, beaten and harassed by Muslim gangs. Top My friend aged 12-17 was Pakistan that I was one of the protected sphere “potatoes” who had protection. But I saw hypocrisy at close range and was disgusted. Muslim gangs have / could devastate free (racism / Jihad behavior), while all attempts “potatoes” do / did to make the same thread are systematically stamped on racism and deconstructed by the local police.
No wonder the Progress Party won the school election. It grows up to a new generation dhimmifisert youth who actually know what Islam and dhimmitude is in contrast to the white politicians and journalists who choose to move to Oslo in 20-30 years of age.
I’m glad I’ve always lived in Oslo West. For it must be hell on the Oslo East: o
Arild,
There’s a bunch of no-go zones in most American cities. The LA’s most famous – Compton, Crenshaw, Watts, Inglewood, etc. but it can not be directly compared with the situation in Europe while the Afro-Americans are Christians, etc.
There are more than 30 Islamic no-go zones in Norway and those in other Western European countries, proportional to the Muslim concentrations in various cities. There are probably many more than 751 in France. Guaranteed more than 1000, and it is growing every day!
Here is the definition:
An Islamic no-go zone:
1. There, drunk, scantily clad non-Muslim girls / women can travel without the imminent threat of rape, violence, robbery, harassment.
2. Where non-Muslim young people can travel without imminent danger of harassment, robbery, violence by Muslim gangs and / or individuals.
3. Where non-Muslim people to express individuality in all the free forms (including religious, sexual, cultural) without the imminent threat of physical / psychological harassment or robbery from Muslims.
Parts of Holmlia, Furuset and many other areas of the Oslo East / Oslo is obvious Islamic no-go zones.
Why do you think non-Muslims move from these areas? Why do you think the Muslim enklavisering continue? The existing 30 Islamic no-go zonene in Norway is increasing every day.
Large parts of Serbia is today a no-go zone for non-Muslim Serbs (Kosovo), to name an extreme. Muslims now require passports from the Christians! An Islamic no-go zone is being developed from the first Muslim family moves into an area where non-Muslims must live in a varying degree of dhimmitude. No one accepts this, so they move away from these Islamic no-go zones. This in turn makes it even harder for the remaining dhimmis to live normally. The results is that the Muslim no-go zonene / enclaves are growing dramatically every day!
Non-Muslims want to live in freedom, not under dhimmitude.
Any area where the non-Muslim citizens or those who travel are experiencing varying degrees of dhimmitude (restriction of their freedom, violence, harassment because they are Muslims and follow the sharia, go with the hijab, etc) is by definition an Islamic no-go zone .
Yellow, I’m impressed regardless of your knowledge related to the rhetorical deconstruction and your rhetorical skills in general. We have much to learn from kulturmarxister in this area.
The number is 270-300 million (not billion). Approximately 80 to 150 were Hindus who were killed in the east-Jihad campaigns (Hindu Kush) before and after the conquest of Sindh, which lasted in an organized manner until the British arrived.
Hindus and Buddhists were shown no mercy whatsoever in the first centuries, in contrast to the book.
Today’s “space folk / Gypsies” are descendants of the Hindu slaves who were brought over the Hindu Kush. Tens of thousands of these gypsies fled when the Caliphate lost in 1683, in Vienna (they brought about 100,000 slaves in the Vienna-campaign). There were so many of them made ??it to Europe.
Hindu Kush genocide is the largest in human history. Ironically NOK is the government of India worse when it comes to indulgence than self kulturmarxistene in Western Europe.
To hide the genocide similar Hitler x 45 can not be described as anything but insane.
I’m NOK much later in the game than him when I have only been politically active for 13 years. I førstegenerasjonsdhimmi (Generation Y). I was active Oslo FrP / FpU in the first 6-7 years (in the cultural conservatives + laissez faire capitalist / liberal camp) and contributed to the Progress Party’s success before I stopped. I felt the time was more important to help develop / promote the political doctrines abroad especially British, German, French, American). I ran the business a few years while I studied and earned a few million so I could finance a inntektsløs politically active life. I now use these funds to be able to work full time to further develop / promote the Vienna Academy (Vienna school of thought) that Fjordman, Bat Yeor, Spencer + many others have already contributed so much till. The last three years I worked full time with a cultural conservative works that will help to further develop / promote these political doctrines further.
Anyway, I consider the future consolidation of the cultural conservative forces on all seven fronts as the most important in Norway and in all Western European countries. It is essential that we work to ensure that all these 7 fronts using the Vienna school of thought, or at least parts of the grunlag for 20-70 year-struggle that lies in front of us.
The book is called, by the way 2083 and is in English, 1100 pages).
To sums up the Vienna school of thought:
- Cultural Conservatism (anti-multiculturalism)
- Against Islamization
- Anti-racist
- Anti-authoritarian (resistance to all authoritarian ideologies of hate)
- Pro-Israel/forsvarer of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries
- Defender of the cultural aspects of Christianity
- To reveal the Eurabia project and the Frankfurt School (ny-marxisme/kulturmarxisme/multikulturalisme)
- Is not an economic policy and can collect everything from socialists to capitalistsFrankfurt School (kulturmarxisme) is a very ambitious unofficial ideology (and quite unknown to most) and they have succeeded in most areas (except to smash capitalism, European Christianity and European identity, traditions, culture). Vienna school is more a defense against this where we often use the Marxist ‘own creations against them (sexual liberation, feminism, liberalism, anti-racism, anti-autoriære arguments).
Vienna school of thought is far from a complete ideology but consists of principles and ideas that are constantly under development. It is unofficial and does not necessarily ever to be recognized.
I think that people often forget the very definition of the word “conspiracy”. What is it?
To conspire is to work in common (among peers) to another group / the other group’s interests (conspiracy) or to implement a particular goal / agenda.
All groups with a political agenda conspire directly or indirectly. Whether they will admit this or not is irrelevant. Document, like all other political led entities (such as class struggle, N (A) RK, cnn, daily newspaper. The clue is that everyone working toward a specific political goal conspire (us included, we are cultural conservatives (> 10%), the other is kulturmarxister (> 10%), Muslim (supports kulturmarxistene by default) (> 5%) kapitalistglobalister (> 1%), and so we have the gray mass in the middle (consisting of many humanists, and others who either sympathize with Marxists or the conservative. This is the group (80%) that we all try to “win the favor of.”
A large proportion of multiculturalism seats are not Marxists but rather either naive humanists (KrF, V, Cr, half said, half-Right) or gobalist capitalists (half right).
Many of these “true humanists” being manipulated by “false humanists” (Marxists) that so often hides his true agenda by playing on humanism.
This is obvious to me, but still theories. I know that many want to implement a Marxist agenda (they have a Marxist background) but we can not prove it 100%, ergo there will be theories.
People can of course do not prove this unless all from a political group had admitted it (and they are not going to do). It does not mean that the truth about people’s political motives are obvious.
Individual’s background tells all about their intentions). Eg. It is a known fact that Barroso was a member of the Portuguese Communist Party in the past. But it is harder to roll up and prove that he and hundreds of other central European elites want to implement the Marxist doctrines through the EU. This is where the martyr-ideologues rails. They come with the charges, presents theories, do battle plan, other more moderate helping themselves from this and look at what this theoretical material that can be used at the present time, as appropriate, etc.
To get back to the point. The word “conspiracy theory” is often associated with something very negative. But it is in fact very often the central truths that still lack evidence, only assertions that have not yet been proven. In time the truth will come out for ALL;)
In the meantime, we share with the mainstream what is “appropriate” at this time;)
A little theory is appropriate if it is in line with people’s perceptions:) And of course it’s important to consistently (slowly) stretching the elastic to help ensure that these perceptions are moving towards the truth.
Hårstad,
I’m generally quite reluctant to move, and theorize too much ang U.S. due to the conditions which are different from those in Europe. They are dominated by Christian immigration, which is not the case here. We are indigenous to Europe, some Americans are not in the U.S., etc. This does not mean that the development does not unfold the way you describe (though it currently lacks evidence NOK), but I do not think it’s necessarily appropriate to put too much emphasis on the U.S. geopolit. at this time. I actually believe the U.S. their fate (and the fate of multiculturalism / kulturmarxisme) will be settled in France in 20-70 years. The indications suggest it.
It is actually essential that people like yourself and Fjordman continues to develop theories of their (our). These are about to lay the foundation for our “Vienna School”. What moderate cultural conservatives believe this work should worry less about. They will come after a few years and shout “hallelujah” when “NOK” evidence supporting these claims;)
Do not take it personally but rather as a compliment. You will have to read between the lines sometimes (we have actually gone so far that we have learned some of the Marxists – war is deceit, etc. ..). The truth is there. But do not believe that truth can only benefit us, it can actually harm us if we do not use it properly. The truth is so ugly that it has the potential to scare many moderates cultural conservatives back into apathy. Yes, you (we are right), but we have not such a bad self-image that we have to gloat with it all the time?
To put it another way. It is critical that individuals / ideologues who Fjordman / Hårstad presents the unpackaged truth to other moderate but experienced cultural conservatives. These moderate cultural conservatives will then make their own judgments and take the necessary precautions. If you believe that the broad strata (individuals who do not have the same intellectual conservative culture knowledge like us) are ready for the full packaged truth will take you wrong. I, with several years of study of this truth is still sick and poor to think about it. What do you think an a-political people had been? He had most likely been shocked and moved to Svalbard or continue to lie to themselves.
Dokument.no has the potential to become an even more influential media company if they play their cards right. When the goal is to reach the broad masses must Dokument.no thus moderating them. The purpose of the media companies / NGOs is to convey as much of sanheten that is “appropriate”, the goal is after all the important, not the means. Thus, there is also in the cards that they can and want to acknowledge doctrines of very specific individuals ONLY if it is appropriate.
I see such ideologues as a martyr-ideologues (I might be in this category, even with similar theories, even though I was not familiar with Fjord Man’s works until 2008). They provide the basic ideological lines to more moderate individuals, the ugly truth beauty, foundation, other more moderate build on this. It will often be expedient to distance himself from these martyr-ideologues for tactical reasons (especially if your goal is to reach out to the large masses). How is the game whether we like it or not. Individuals have different functions. Do not be offended because of that, but take it rather as a compliment;)
Do you think kulturmarxister will ever be so stupid that they admit that they want to implement Marx’s doctrines? The fact that they use humanism to advance a Marxist utopia? No, they distance themselves from Marx for strategic reasons. They are not born yesterday and it is not we.
We were honest once, but Marx and Muhammad has forced us to become more like them, unfortunately.
They had their “Frankfurt School”. We are going to develop our own “Vienna School” of necessity.
Embrace it! DE has made the rules, we just follow them.
Controllers – dominate, not necessarily very big difference. The common denominator in all historical cases, dhimmitude + demographic warfare. Are non-Muslims on Furuset, Holmlia today dhimmis? Yes, of course they do. Why do you think they systematically choose to move?
Why do you think Furuset, Holmlia and other areas in Oslo soon be emptied of non-Muslims? Enklaviseringen in Oslo East continues slowly but surely every day.
For those words must have it with a teaspoon (this may be fine with a small demographic history reminder now and then):
Kosovo demographical development [1]:
1900 40% Islam
1913 50%
1925 60%
1948 72%
1971 79%
1981 85%
2008 93%Source:
1. http://www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/011.shtml#6
Lebanon demographical development – (Christian/Muslim pop)[1]:
1911 – 21% Islam
1921 – 45%
1932 – 49%
1943 – 48%
1970 – 58% (Civil war 1975–1990 started when Islam reached 60%)
1990 – 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 – 75%Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln; June 1997.
Bethlehem
Source 1
1948 85% Christians[1]
2006 12% Christians[1]Source 2
1948 – 60% Christians[2]
1983 – 20% Christians[2]Source:
1. http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=23696_Christmas_Disappears_from_Bethlehem&only
2. http://www.danielpipes.org/1050/disappearing-christians-in-the-middle-east
3. http://www.danielpipes.org/1050/disappearing-christians-in-the-middle-eastAnatolia (Turkey)
1300 – 99% Christians
1450 – 90% (3 years before the fall of Constantinople)
1600 – 55%
1850 – 35% (Genocide/forceful conversions intensifies)
1900 – 20%
1920 – 15%
1945 – 6% (Focus shifts to persecution of Muslim Kurds)
1980 – 3%
2009 – 1%1. http://home.att.net/~dimostenis/greektr.html
2. See all sources from Historic Balkan and Anatolia demographicsSyria [1]
1920 – 33% Christians
2007 – 10% (would be less than 5% if it weren’t for Christian immigration from Iraq).1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mandate_of_Syria.png
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SyriaPakistan (Hindu/Muslim population) [1]
1941 – 25% Hindus
1948 – 17%
1991 – 1,5%
2007 – 1%Bangladesh (Hindu/Muslim population) [1]
1941 – 30% Hindus
1948 – 25%
1971 – 15%
1991 – 10%
2007 – 8%2008 – Numbers and percentages of Muslims in many European cities (legal/illegal including city suburbs)[1][2][3]:
Marseilles 38%
Malmö 35%
Brussels 35%
Amsterdam 30%
Stockholm 20%
London 20%
Paris 20%
Oslo 20%
Moscow 16-20%
Berlin 18%
The Hague 17%
Copenhagen 17%
Utrecht 15%
Rotterdam 15%
Antwerp 15%
Hamburg 15%Sources:
1. http://www.globalpolitician.com/24799-europe
2. http://tinyfrog.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/muslim-demographics/
3. Indymedia.be notes that Brussels is 25.5% MuslimHva er så fellesnevneren i alle disse historiske tilfellene?
Islam + dhimmitude + demografisk krigføring (Jihad)
This is only the beginning of a protracted campaign of psychological warfare against the Swiss people. The worst of all, it works very effectively, as we saw in Austria a few years ago. The Swiss people will succumb to demonization, as Østerikerne and Serbs before them.
The fact that kulturmarxistene controls the Euro / U.S. MSM, 95% of NGOs and 80% of the political parties is perhaps the main reason that we must expect to struggle with multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and the Islamization of at least 20-70 years.
Until this happens, the Hårstad points out further polarization between kulturmarxistene (elites) and the cultural conservatives (the people). Muslims make today 20-25% of the Oslo and similar areas in other European capitals. 50-60% is the magic enklaviseringsgrensen and there are several cities that gradually approaches this. Marseilles is the worst example in Western Europe at the moment with 38% Muslims. The city will have a Muslim majority within 20 years. It is thus conceivable that the battle for Islam’s future in Europe will unfold in just France within 20 years. Perhaps the consequence that France breaks out of the nåværeden U.S. / Euro dominated multiculturalism wonderful world order and seeking a new political alliance with Russia and some other mini-nations (hopefully followed by several European nations).
20 years earlier, my bet (70 years maximum). So change will come, guaranteed, we just have to smear us with a little patience.
In this comment he actually mocks a journalist for speculating that a terror attack may have had a right-wing motivation. “I have never heard of such an attack being carried out on European soil”.
The attack was most likely carried out by Muslims of Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
There are now several key Jihadists who are wanted.
No “bomb” in other words …, p
http://www.dagbladet.no/2009/11/29/nyheter/utenriks/russland/terror/togulykke/9247105/
I do not understand why cnn mention the extreme right and the National Socialists? I have never ever heard of a right extreme or NS terrorist attacks of importance on European soil. This sounds like kulturmarxistisk wishful thinking.
Euro / US kulturmarxistisk MSM is now working on a comprehensive motkampanje consisting of psychological warfare against the Swiss people (as we saw against Østerikerne a few years ago). They will be latterligjort, mocked, and threatened to change his point of view. They will be portrayed as Nazis, racists and fascists (monsters) and they are going to be intimidated into silence. It is possibly a new referendum in a few months where only 40% ish is going to vote for. This is how game works, unfortunately.
We should not underestimate the MSM and their highly efficient power to shape people’s opinions.
The following summarizes the agenda of many kulturmarxister with Islam, it explains also why those on death and life protecting them. It explains so well why we, the cultural conservatives, are against Islamization and the implementation of these agendas.
Yellow,
I have great respect for kulturmarxister that are tough NOK to admit his true intentions. It is very annoying however, that 90% of all kulturmarxister directly lying to the people by hiding / hide their agenda behind the “humanism and human rights”.
Are you tough NOK to admit that this is your agenda, Yellow, or claiming you are still you run of “humanism”? It is the sense to discuss if one side refuses to admit his true intentions.
Most of us cultural conservatives are honest NOK to admit that we are working towards Marxism and Marxist principles (which is the main reason we are against the ongoing Islamization when we look at the Ummah as an entity that promotes the Marxist principles, among others). So why can not you be tough NOK to admit that it really your agenda is to work for the implementation of Marxist principles and that you look at Muslims as a natural ally (for practical reasons and not the humanities).
We know by the way all of what happened to the Christians Marxists in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country (80% in 1911). When the Muslims were in majority in 1970 (an increase of 40% in just 60 years), they declared war. The reason that they were in that situation was due to the Marxist’s appeasement policy (they allowed demographic warfare). Marxists thought that they would get an extra special dhimmi status, which of course did not happen. There are now fewer than 25% Christians in Lebanon and even the Christian Marxists living in a difficult situation. Do you really think you will get a special dhimmistatus few decades in Western Europe when all the historical examples show that Christians Marxists being stabbed in the back end again and again?
It is strange why they never learn from historical examples? Kulturmarxister have much in common with Muslims, but at the end of the day the matter considered by the Ummah as gudshatende and gay-loving infidel, which is incompatible with Islam. The result is that they once again will be betrayed by the Ummah.
It is quite ironic that the Ummah has more respect for their opponents, the cultural conservative, than their allies, kulturmarxistene, they only see as “temporary” useful idiots.
They get to enjoy the alliance as long as it lasts:)
The document was intended to be “approved” stamp by Lars M and yellow, they immediately become irrelevant. It is reasonably safe;)
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims do not follow the Quran that is. It is the political doctrine of Islam is the problem.
The problem is that key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish “moderate Muslims” (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims.
Who do you first introduced the concept of “War is deceit “?;).Lars M. and Yellow,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
I assumed that the attackers were Muslims immediately south Philippines was mentioned. Everyone knows that the Southern Philippines is one of the world’s 40 Jihad Fronts.
It makes little difference whether the victims were Christians or Muslims. Muslims in the continent is known to use very brutal methods.
There are a number of extremely brutal Islamist groupings in southern Philippines – Abu Sayyaf Islamists (Al-Harakat al-Ansar) are one of them. They fund their organizations through kidnappings and avkapping of heads of civilian Christians are part of their methods. Now, of course not kulturmarxistiske Euro / U.S. MSM attempt to find connections between these groups and attacked. Again, we ordinary citizens have to do journalistic work FOR them …
Again, try European and U.S. MSM to lead his people deceived. I have not yet read a single place in the MSM that the attackers were Muslims.
So what was it that happened? A more conservative Muslim clan that made an example out of a more secular clan for unknown reasons?
Here you can read more about the Abu Sayyaf and other Islamist groupings in Southern Philippines:
Mini Nations such as Norway has never recognized an independent, sovereign foreign policy.
They, however, has always followed the big three European heavyweights – France, UK, Germany, to the letter. In other words, Norway has always copied these heavyweights and will always do so.
It is like comparing Belarus and Russia. We will always be Belarus and Russia are our three tigers.
UK is no different from Germany and France have all chosen to multiculturalism. The fact that the UK is wary of the EU is not about multikulti but more that the UK will continue to have a special relationship with the U.S. (which is also 100% multikulti).
The only “Western” nations that refused to implement multikulti were Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and partly Finland.
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have been protected from the EU / US ‘s witch hunt because they are not Europeans.
If they had been Europeans had been demonized as the Nazis, fascists and racists.
Why Norway is “more European” than the EU has something to do with “Little Man Syndrome”. It can be likened to a “convert to Islam,” which often is much more fundamentalist than even conservative Arab Muslims because they themselves feel they have much to prove (“Little Man Syndrome”).
The main problem when cultural conservatives and kulturmarxister debate is that the perception of reality are too different.
Many kulturmarxister look at Israel as a “racist” state.
Cultural conservatives disagree when they believe the conflict is based on Islamic imperialism, that Islam is a political ideology and not a race. Cultural conservatives believe Israel has a right to protect themselves against the Jihad.
Kulturmarxistene refuses to recognize the fact that Islam’s political doctrine is relevant and essential. They can never admit to or support this because they believe that this is primarily about a race war – that Israel hates Arabs (breed).
As long as you can not agree on the fundamental perceptions of reality are too naive to expect that one to come to any conclusion.
Before one at all can begin to discuss this conflict must first agree on the fundamental truths of Islam’s political doctrine.
Most people here have great insight in key Muslim concepts that al-taqiiya (political deceit), naskh (Quranic abrogation) and Jihad. The problem is that kulturmarxister refuses to recognize these concepts.
They can not recognize these key Muslim concepts. For if they do so erodes the primary argument that Israel is a “racist state” and that this is a race war (Israelis vs. Arabs) and not defense against Jihad (Kafr vs. Ummah).
The fact that there are 40 different Jihad Fronts (wars) throughout the world chooses to ignore. For those do not exist Jihad. For them, this 40 ethnic fronts (40 race wars) that does not have anything to do with Islam.
The Marxist theory is very poorly conceived. F example, the so-called Bosnian Swedes are ethnic Serbs. The only thing that separates the two groups is Islam. The examples are many.
Do not know quite where to take it up but our own Fjordman is about to be cut to 3 position among the most recognized / influential European intellectuals anti-Jihad/anti-multikulti/anti-Marxist / bloggers.
After Gates of Vienna (No. 1) and New English Review (2). Ovverraskende NOK Fjordman is actually possible to turn himself Brussels Journal!
In other words. Those who have not yet read Fjord Man’s book, “Defeating Eurabia” has not been followed by an hour. I know it’s hard to be prophet in his own country but this is beyond all expectations. Congratulations Fjordman:)
You have of course absolutely right. What I was referring to were individuals Yellow (leader of the Humanist Association), which only attacks Christianity while ignoring the spread of Islam.
It is tragicomic that an important NGO that NHA has been the coup of a cultural Marxist, then it should be led by a liberal anti-Jihadist-type Bruce Bawer.
The next 20 years, we must work hard to regain control of at least five major NGOs. The fact that the Progress Party has been living clean makes this task easier.
It is wonderful to reflect that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. The European cultural conservative movement is small at the moment but we are growing every day. And within 70 years, it’s time for regime changes in Europe. At this point, the multi-cultural neo colonial regimes either imploded or become very Stalinist.
Before that, we must focus on the following:
1. Creating a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution
2. Regaining control of several NGOs
3. Develop and consolidate the cultural conservative intellectual movement
4. Build an “EDL” type of youth
Lars Gule, “This is simply unacceptable in a modern and democratic state, based on religious freedom and other human rights.”
The problem is that many kulturmarxister actually cares very little about religious freedom and human rights. They are kulturmarxister driven by contempt and hatred for the cultural conservatives, for European cultures, etc. Many are hiding behind the false allegations of human rights and religious freedom as it serves as the perfect obfuscation of their true motives.
Where have they been for the past 20 years with regard to criticism of Islam? Why have they been totally absent in this area? They have however, spent much of your time to attack Christian …
It is very difficult to deal with individuals who deliberately use deception to advance their agenda. Kulturmarxistene has for 40 years hiding behind the humanistic principles as their real agenda was to crush the European tradition, culture, identity and sovereignty of nations. All in the name of human rights …
You can not have a dialogue if one side deliberately lying, again and again.
National Socialism has always been an extreme left ideology then why are they trying constantly to strategically place it on the right side?
If you hate capitalism and the free market, such as Marxists, Nazis and Islamists do, attained the left side, period.
Hate propaganda against Italy and Denmark is incredibly hypocritical. Norway’s own violent “Marxist / Islamist Jugend” (Red Youth, SOS Racism, Blitz, in partnership with Jihad youth) that have harmed and terrorized hundreds of cultural conservatives in recent years in Oslo is not mentioned with one word … It may be fine as long as multiculturalism seat control the violent mob?
It is unacceptable that the Labour Party, Socialist Party, Left, SP, CDP financing these violent extremists.
Funny to see every single European cultural Marxist “foam around the mouth” of hatred against Denmark and Italy. The only Western European countries that have a hint of wise leadership.
It is our duty to make sure to support the only anti-racist cultural conservative organization that has the guts NOK to walk the streets of Oslo – SIOE. FpU is another anti-racist cultural conservative organization. Unfortunately they have not the guts to demonstrate to other than tolls and high gas prices, etc.
However, it is understandable. No one dares because they know they are being harassed and attacked. But people are getting tired of this insecurity. The result is organizations such as the EDL and other forms of vigilante.
The problem is fairly under-analyzed.
If we are working to “temporary secular” Islam in Europe by supporting individuals Kokkvold, it will be the same as shooting ourselves. The only thing that will be secular, the “visual aspect” of Islam while the destructive aspects – the demographic warfare will continue in silence. This war is accepted as long as the “visual” is a factor.
Moderate multiculturalists who Kokkvold may thus prove to be even more destructive for Europe than the more extreme multiculturalists.
What most people still do not understand is that the ongoing Islamization (secondary process) of Europe can not be stopped before taking a settlement with the political doctrines that allow this (and the individuals who fronts these doctrines). There must be more focus on multicultural doctrines (multiculturalism = kulturmarxisme) as it is this ideology that allows the political mechanisms that result in continued Islamization (Islamic demographic warfare). People must learn what multiculturalism wonderful doctrines do with Europe:
Systematic breakdown:
- European Christianity
- European tradition
- European Cultures
- European (a national) identity
- SovereignsOf course, it is known that kulturmarxistene and humanities in Europe think they are going to reform Islam but they will fail like all before them have done. We, for our part, the cultural conservatives and anti-Marxist liberal, must focus on the basic problem – multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and how to combat this hatideologien. Multiculturalism can only be stopped through the continued consolidation of the cultural conservatives and accountability of individuals as fronts ideology. We need to focus more on defending the “Feedback” option, and our doctrines. A further consolidation of the cultural conservatives are the solution. We need to awaken people and help more contribute through political activism (against specific targets).
Four important tasks we have to work with the next twenty years are the following:
1. Have in place a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution (which will be the only newspaper that will support the Progress Party in 4 years). For believe me, the Progress Party is going to be sabotaged and torpedoed by every choice (a voter base of 35% are “scared” down to 20%).
2. Develop an alternative to the violent extremes Norwegian Marxist organizations Blitz / SOS Racism / Red Youth. This can for example be done by supporting the development of SIOE. Conservatives dare not currently flagging their views on the street when they know that extreme Marxists clubs them down. We can not accept that Labour subsidize these violent “Stoltenberg Art” that systematically terrorize political conservatives.
3. Working to gain control of 10-15 NGOs (kulturmarxistene controls currently 10-15 while we only have 2-3).
4. Initiate a partnership with the conservative forces within the Norwegian Church. I know that the liberal forces within the European anti-Jihad movement (Bruce Bawer, among other things, and some other liberals) will have a problem with this but the conservative forces within the church is actually one of our best allies. Our main opponents must not be Jihadists Jihadists but facilitators – namely multiculturalism seats.
A nightmare scenario as I see it is if multiculturalism seats do a “Ataturk” in Western Europe. The result in this case is a long and painful death for Europe’s part, as in Lebanon. Tykriaeksempelet prove that a Muslim population can restrain himself (no requirements) under an authoritarian regime, to demand Sharia 100 years (or longer) in the future as soon as it opens up a possibility. This combined ability for continued Islamic demographic warfare is going to end in disaster.
It should be noted that the majority of the Christians in Lebanon were kulturmarxister who fronted multiculturalism wonderful doctrines from 1911 (there were too few who fronted nationalism and separatism of Muslims). As we all know that ended in tragedy:
Lebanon demographical development – (Christian / Muslim pop) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam (79% Christian)
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (Civil War 1975-1990 started When Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%Worst of all is that there are more such examples that can be documented. Western Europe is a Lebanon in effect …
So please. Focus on the real evil – multiculturalism and not the result of evil. If there is a water leak then you have to focus on stopping the leak first, do not sweep up the water;).
Source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
Labour wants mass immigration to engineer multicultural UK, says former Blair and Straw adviser.
Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser has revealed.
The former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.
This proves therefore that some of the motivation for mass immigration is not based on humanism (cloak) but more due. direct hatred of people with conservative values ??as us, the cultural conservatives. A large part of them hate all European and want to destroy it through multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is an anti-European hate ideology designed to destroy a European culture / traditions, identity, Christianity and the Nations sovereignty. The goal is a utopian Marxistist superstate. To accomplish this, the first all European annihilated. Of course there are genuine humanists (which is only suisidalt naive) but I suspect that a larger proportion of a previously thought are cultural Marxists (multiculturalists) direct hateful intentions.
Possibly the following proportion:
Opponents of cultural conservative Doctrines:
Cultural Marxists: 30% (hateful Intentions)
Suicidal Humanist: 65% (naive)
Capitalist globalists: 5% (greed)Has anyone tried to make an estimate of our opponent’s intentions? This will be relevant to a possible future Nurnbergprosess. It is of course difficult to prove this, because almost everyone uses kulturmarxister humanistic tire alibis.
Sources:
1.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html
2.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222613/Labour-let-migrants-engineer-multicultural-UK.html?ITO=1490&referrer=yahoo
3. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222769/Dishonest-Blair-Straw-accused-secret-plan-multicultural-UK.html
Norwegian journalists won the war against the Progress Party. They managed to reduce the party by 6% over four weeks of intense warfare.
Successful media blackout of the riots in France, Britain, Sweden sealed the fate and the cost of the socialist victory.
This is our own fault because we have failed to create a cultural conservative (pro-FrP) media channel with national distribution.
Yep, the possibilities / solutions we create ourselves. F as independent bloggers who document and others can provide copies of the content / articles / essays of this new company, if they want extra security / screening.
There will be minimal risk to those involved, “content providers”. There is only upside for these suppliers when they actually get / will get well paid for a job they currently make no charge. They will also have distributed their content to x3/x5/x10/x30 times more readers. Investors are taking all the risk (press is a bonus but not essential).
This will start as an ideal project but depending on objectives, it is actually a good potential for earnings (if combined with “popular” content). Earnings are however a secondary goal. The main aim is increasing political influence through unofficial support for the Progress Party / Conservative Party.
Finance / business will most likely be the least problem. The challenge lies in whether they want editorial “content providers” dare to take the step.
Very well written:)
We should immediately work towards joint establishment of a cultural conservative major newspaper (paper / online national distribution).
I know many of the Progress Party and know that there are strong forces there that want to develop “Progress,” Progress Party newspaper. I also know of several cultural conservative investors.
What about working to consolidate the Progress of document (may idag.no?) + Get funding from strategic investors?
Call the newspaper: “Conservative” as the only cultural conservative media company in Norway.
There is a chance that OBI will want to be part of such a project.
Primary Doctrines:
Critical to multiculturalism (Anti-kulturmarxistisk)
Anti-racist
Pro Progress Party (maybe right)
Pro Israel (+ support for Armenia, Christian Copts / Maronite / Assyriere, cultural conservative Indians, support for the establishment of a Christian state Biafra, Southern Nigeria and support to the establishment of a Christian state in Sudan, support for Russian / Thailand / Philippines / China + fighting Jihad)
Anti-UN
Anti-EU
Critical to kulturmarxistiske media (all)
Pro free market
Pro ChristianSome input?
I did not say that the EDL in the present form, where we had wished it had been. But it is essential that the intellectual conservative forces gives (unofficial) political ideologist and training to our young people 15-25. Who else will do it?
We can not despise the young people in society and refuse to approach them because they lack ideological training, then it just is OUR (the cultural conservative intellectuals) responsibility to ensure this.
Bawer is NOK is not right person to work as a bridge builder. He is a liberal anti-jihadist and not a cultural conservative in many areas. I have my suspicions that he is too paranoid (in terms of its gays orientation). It seems that he fears that “cultural conservatives” are going to be a threat to gays in the future. He refuses, therefore, to seize their opportunity to influence these in a positive direction? This seems completely irrational.
It should be noted that many organizations that VB has many “reforms” to complete before they are on our level.
In all cases, we are not in a situation where we can pick and choose partners. We must therefore make sure to influence other cultural conservatives to come to our anti-rasistiske/pro-homser/pro-Israel line. When they reach this line, one can take it to the next level.
The consolidation should continue, and people must not make a difference (rather than isolate).
Very good analysis. You’re absolutely right. I have not been present in the Norwegian debate until now when I have debated in English for several years / total material Compendium, which I once finished:)
I feel it is important to create a pan-European platform for rhetoric / objectives / policy analysis / research of historical factors relevant to so and transfer this knowledge to every nation. It pan-Europeiske/US environment Robert Spencer, Fjordman, Atlas, Analekta + 50 other EU / U.S. bloggers (and Facebook groups) is the epicenteret for policy analysis and has been for some years.
Much of this knowledge has already been communicated through “document” (are incredibly impressed with the level of knowledge here:)) indicating that it is going to shape a new pan-European “cultural conservative” intellectual movement that is agreed on the basic truths .
10/20/30 The next year we should focus on the following:
- Create a cultural conservative major newspaper (paper / online) in each country (our voice that reaches out to all of Norway). The goal is obviously to raise more Norwegians up from the coma.
- Provide funding for this project through cultural conservative investors.
-Contribute to shape / develop a youth / action group that represents our ideological platform (anti-racist but critical of multiculturalism / Islamization etc) EDL / SIOE form outlines how such an organization would look like. We can f as develop SIOE or create a new one. EDL has been racist stamp, and they work hard to get rid of this (all individuals who are racist / discriminatory speech will be from now thrown out). It is difficult to start a grass roots / action group in Norway when the government pumps in insane amounts of everything to please everyone (except us;)It’s just for us to get started. The window opens up in the earliest 10 years, most recently about 70 years so we still have plenty of time. But we should not waste too much time to “confirm to each other that we have a problem.” It is essential that we also focus on working specifically at these points.
Hårstad / Xebeche / Skaug
Yep, you’re absolutely right.
Kulturmarxistene managed to bargain crucial popular platforms that secured them victory:
- Sexual Liberation (weakening of the church / morals / patriarchy / nuclear family / birth rates)
- Feminism – positive and negative effects (weakening of the church / patriarchy / nuclear family / birth rates)
- Rights of workers – positive aspects
- Drug / alcohol / party of liberation (weakening of the nuclear family / moral / birth rates)
- Multi-Cultural – sold in as the introduction of exciting offers / food / experiences (negative aspects: mass immigration, Islam, ghettofication-> enklavisering, crime-murder / rape / robbery / violence, weakening of the identity / culture / unit / nation etc.. )
Too much of these elements (with a few exceptions) will help to draw us towards a Marxist utopia (chaos).
The only pragmatic we can do is work on cultural conservative consolidation in the next 10/20/30/40 year so that we can avail ourselves of the window that will surely open up (Fjord Man scenario.)
98% of all Norwegian journalists are now cultural Marxists / multiculturalists / politically correct (or sympathize).
The problem is that the fundamental institutions in Norway as for example, Volda University College (School of Journalism) and University of Oslo has been infiltrated already several decades ago (and most other schools for that matter). These are today indoktrineringsleire for future generations of the cultural Marxists / multiculturalists / politically correct.
This was obviously not last year. The cultural Marxists have had the opportunity (when the AP never punished / imprisoned them) to infiltrate our institutions since 1945. In 1968, the first “litter” indoctrinated with Marxists are ready to implement their doctrines. The results we see today.
I have no idea how we are to reverse this. It seems as if Islam can actually solve this problem for us in the course of 30-70 years, when the cultural Marxists will soon lose control over these forces.
I’ve always wondered, there was no cultural conservative intellectual and / or grass roots options in 1968?
One can see forever the cultural Marxists demonstrating in the streets of the images in 1968-1972, but where was the cultural-conservative forces?
4 weeks of Jihad in Gøteborg, Sweden. European media companies are refusing to report. This case and the Muslim riots in United Kingdom (also categorically ignored by 90% of journalists) could have influenced the Norwegian election. How can a democracy work when 98% of Western European journalists openly sympathize with “cultural Marxism”? These deliberate “media blackouts” are authoritarian in nature.
Yep, it’s really bad (it can not possibly be worse than it is now?).
I got the answers to two of my questions from the chief Communist in Aftenposten yesterday by the way:
http://www.aftenposten.no/nettprat/article3251899.ece
Aftenposten – interview with Hilde Scientist – Editor in Chief, came from Arbeiderbladet, many Aftenposten journalists are old AKP (ml) and SV sympathizers …
What is the rationale for the Event, by 1972, gradually began to support multiculturalism (kulturmarxisme) and thus in practice no longer continued to be a cultural conservative media alternative? Was it because of pressure from the labor movement?
Anders BAftenposten is an independent newspaper, with a liberal-conservative worldviews. Hilde
What do you think that Norway joins the ranks of countries that no longer have any major cultural conservative newspapers (newspapers that are critical of multiculturalism)?
Anders BI also think it is a problem that the Norwegian media are too similar in their analysis and views. I think it is because the conflict in Norwegian politics really is not that great. Greeting Hilde
Great that you found sources for the survey:)
This process (Marxist-infiltration in European universities) began in 1945 after the Communists won the war.
Europe’s biggest mistake was that they allowed Marxists to operate freely after the war. 45-50 generation of Marxists was learning champions to 68-generation that today manages everything.
Infiltration of Marxists in European universities (1945-1968) described in great detail here:
http://www.freecongress.org/centers/cc/index.aspx
You argue very good for your eyesight. I have no doubt that you have good intentions. In all cases, we fundamentally disagree when it comes to goals. I wish it was possible to discuss it freely.
“When you said what you want, you must say what you want instead. If not, nothing happens.”
The problem is that the assumptions for the discussion is not present in Norway and Western Europe. We, the cultural conservatives, is already being branded as fascists / racists / Nazis of the political and media establishment because we dare to criticize multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) which is totally unacceptable. It is as bad as the persecution of the Jews for 30 years or under the Inquisition. No / very few thus wishes to share the solution-oriented ideas / concepts in an open forum at this stage as this can help to stigmatize people further in the future.
Fjordman,
I have worked full time in more than three years of a solution-oriented work (lecture notes written in English). I have taken a view to contributing in areas that are on the side of what has been the main focus. Much of the info I’m sitting on is unknown to most, even for you.
If you send me an email at year2083@gmail.com I will send an electronic version when I’m finished.
Norway has for me been absolutely no interest until now. The main focus should be on an intellectual platform consolidation of European cultural conservative organizations / individuals. This alliance should have as its main focus is to de-legitimizing multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) of the “European ideology of hate” it actually is. Its purpose (or indirect result) is known to completely destroy western civilization, nation-states, Western culture / norms / traditions, Christianity – European / Norwegian identity.
If this rough work is completed there is the basis for a Marxist superstate (EUSSR) without the necessary cultural conservative / nationalist components that could be stopped from Islam to dominate this new entity.
It seems like you’re pretty unenlightened and naive, given the potential consequences of multiculturalism. I’m starting to wonder if you might be one of those who have not even studied the historical demographic surveys of countries that have had multiculturalism and where Islam has been involved?;)
Look at the Lebanese demographic trends. As we all know, Lebanon’s demographic development has been marked that the Islamic demographic warfare (invandring + high birth rates) combined with an escape of the Christian population. Lebanon was once a Christian country. Thanks to multiculturalism as unexpected pleasures is Lebanon today is a very unstable Muslim country that is characterized by murder, persecution and torture of non-Muslims:
Lebanon demographic development – (Christian / Muslim) [1]:
1911 to 21% Islam
1921 to 45%
1932 to 49%
1943 to 48%
1970 to 58% (1975-1990 Civil War began when Islam reached 60%)
1990 to 65% (The Christians lost the war)
2008 to 75%What is your reasoning that you believe that no Western European countries will suffer the same fate?
source:
1. Tomass Mark, Game Theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln, June 1997.
I encourage you to read books that explain the ideology multiculturalism, Frankfurt School and its origin. You can for example start with the book “Defeating Eurabia”.
The main problem in Western Europe is that there is only one accepted alternative, namely PC (PC = cultural Marxism / multiculturalism).
Those who dare to criticize multiculturalism (and supporting cultural conservative views) are now branded as fascists / Nazis / racists. The problem is that the doctrines which form the basis of political correctness will not or can allow alternative ideas and are thus very intolerant.
Progress Party is a victim of this intolerance.
The question you should ask yourself is, if cultural differences were too great for the Christian Norwegians and Swedes Christians could live together, how can we expect the Norwegians and Somalis can live together peacefully?
Ideology of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) is an anti-European hatideologi whose purpose is to destroy European culture, identity and Christianity in general. I equate making multiculturalism with the other hatideologiene: Nazism (anti-Jewish), communism (anti-individualism) and Islam (anti-Kafr).
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan refused to implement multiculturalism (like the three the only Western country that still has monokulturalisme). They argued that “societal Cohesion” is synonymous with harmony within a society. They still see with amazement at this strange European experiment.
Such cases must be considered together with similar cases where the media consistently ignores issues related to Muslim riots.
All remember the July riots in Marseilles and other French cities where the media were instructed not to report the news.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/07/media-blackout-violence-in-france.html
One can only wonder how many riots have been in France or other countries that we have never heard of. It is in the process of developing a trend in Western Europe where there is full acceptance that the media can suppressing such cases.
Estimated damage from the July riots in France: 800-1500 burnt-out cars, dozens of buildings burnt out, several people injured (including police officers). Not a single article in the MSM. I called both TV2 and NRK but they thought it was not “news worthy” … Maybe not so strange when 90-95% of all European journalists are in favor of multiculturalism and do not want to contribute to the injury “integration process” by conveying the truth.
This is a very frightening development and document further how the media serves as propaganda machinery to multiculturalism seats.
The orders of “media blackout” have been strictly applied. Le Monde refused to respond, citing “ministerial instructions.” “Yesterday morning, every journalist who came, even for the smallest piece of news, to the firemen, or gendarmes or police, heard the same answer: ‘No fires’. In fact, the truth is quite different. Some of those we questioned admitted under their breath: ‘We cannot say anything about the fires. We have received orders.” In Lyons, the daily Le Progrès reports the same blackout: “Orders not to speak to the press were given to firemen, gendarmes and police.”
I strongly doubt that your theory is correct. The whole conflict between GDP and EDL started with a change of leadership in the EDL for a few months ago. They threw out the racist and denounced the BNP. They chose instead SIOE’s ideological basis that is more or less mainstream view on the right side in Western Europe now (Vienna School of Thought).
Nick was very offended and began to demonize the EDL. Although they are now attacking each other as they compete not at all as these are two quite different fronts. 90% of all votes in the EDL continued GDP (Since this is the only alternative to multikulti in the UK) and 90% of GDP supports EDL regardless of what Nick had to think.
Second, Labour governs intelligence service. They had never in his life supported the EDL as these create a lot of positive attention for the cultural conservative movement in the UK.
I have on some occasions discussed with SIOE and EDL and recommended them to use conscious strategies.
The tactics of the EDL is now out to “entice” an overreaction from Jihad Youth / Extreme-Marxists something they have succeeded several times already. Over The reaction has been repeatedly shown on the news which has booster EDLs ranks high. This has also benefited GDP. WinWin for both.
But I must say I am very impressed with how quickly they have grown but this has to do with smart tactical choice by management.
EDL is an example and a Norwegian version is the only way to prevent Flash / SOS to harass Norwegian cultural conservatives from other fronts. Creating a Norwegian EDL should be No. 3 on the agenda after we have started up a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution.
The agenda of the Norwegian cultural conservative movement over the next 5 years are therefore:
1. Newspaper with national distribution
2. Working for the control of several NGOs
3. Norwegian EDL
James on 24 Jul 2011 at 2:52 am #
I really don’t think it matters that he was critical of ethno-nationalism. Just the fact that he is somewhat “conservative” is enough for the media to start smearing the right as a whole. Keep in mind these people think that your average Republican is a right-wing extremist.
Walker on 24 Jul 2011 at 3:15 am #
See:
http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/the-tragedy-in-norway-and-the-search-for-convenient-scapegoats/
Kirt Higdon on 24 Jul 2011 at 5:35 am #
Breivik is certainly politically and ideologically obsessed, but no more unhinged or inconsistent than many bloggers I’ve read on this and other sites. What I don’t see, at least in these quoted comments of his, is any inclination to violence. His attorneys say he will explain himself further in court. While I am interested in his motivation, the explanation I’m most interested in hearing is how he was able to single-handedly plan and carry out the double massacre. It took years of intelligence gathering, months of training and preparation, and a whole squad of heavily armed Navy Seals to kill one unarmed man in Pakistan. I’d be amazed if there were not others involved with Breivik.
RonL on 24 Jul 2011 at 9:46 pm #
If Anders Behring Breivik is insane, his “ideology” is secondary to his mental pathology. If he is sane in we should look at his ideology, methodology, and goals. Breivik considered the EU/EUSSR totalitarian in nature. He wrote a manifesto calling for revolution, not working within the legal systems of Europe. If the response to this terrorism is to suppress non-violent nationalists and anti-racist conservatives, then the winners will be the violent racists and revolutionaries. Opposition will be moved underground where it will fester and become violent and that is his goal. Any persecution of non-violent anti-Jihad activists or traditionalist conservatives will only help foster revolutionaries and terrorists.
James on 25 Jul 2011 at 2:18 pm #
What no one is asking is why does as “right-wing” anti-Jihadist who supposedly wants to rid Europe of Islam, Muslims and muliticulturalism goes and kills non-Muslim Norwegians. Of course, I know that the political establishment in Norway, like in most of the West, is committed to the self-destructive leftist ideology but wouldn’t an attack actually on Muslims in Norway make more sense given that profile. So many things about this do not make sense. This is why I have to think he is simply insane.
Matt Weber on 26 Jul 2011 at 12:39 am #
I read in la Repubblica that he says he didn’t do it alone.
More thoughts on Anders Behring Breivik | Conservative Heritage Times on 26 Jul 2011 at 3:12 am #
[...] cow: check out this | | | | | [...]
Bruce on 26 Jul 2011 at 11:16 am #
Ron’s comment was very interesting. That’s a thought I haven’t seen discussed anywhere.
Bruce on 26 Jul 2011 at 11:18 am #
Kirt,
Which bloggers at this site aren’t unhinged and inconsistent? I need to know which ones I shouldn’t avoid.
Kirt Higdon on 26 Jul 2011 at 2:41 pm #
Good point! Kind of like the T-shirt slogan which reads, “You say psycho like it’s a bad thing”.
Bruce on 26 Jul 2011 at 3:35 pm #
Seriously Kirt. I want to know which bloggers here you endorse. You’re here so often. Presumably, you like at least one of them.
Kirt Higdon on 26 Jul 2011 at 7:43 pm #
Endorse? I don’t even give myself an across the board endorsement. I’m as unhinged and inconsistent as any and I was labelled a terrorist decades before that became an official government term. I think with any of the bloggers here, there are some comments I would agree with and some I would not agree with.
Weaver on 30 Jul 2011 at 7:33 am #
Communism kills over 100m people last century – atheist, anti-nationalist communism – and Europeans today think a world without faith and nation would be utopia.
And in reply to Islam conquering Europe: The spread of democracy and vice into Muslim countries is seen as a triumph of “Western culture”, as if such is all we are now.
Weaver on 30 Jul 2011 at 7:41 am #
Reg. the motivation, as Buchanan stated: the shooter was after the next generation of liberal political elite. I dunno that such entirely makes sense because children, even early 20s, often aren’t sure what they stand for. It seems like such a person would target adults, not that I approve of such action at all.
While ideally a couple should have children by their early twenties, they haven’t likely matured politically until perhaps their late twenties I’d say. One victim I’ve read was merely eleven – apparently a victim the shooter regrets though.
Will The Norwegian People Disappear? on 27 Nov 2012 at 8:37 pm #
[...] on the planet. They are so opposed to other viewpoints that it takes a man to kill 77 people for those views to even be heard. The debate on multiculturalism will rage [...]